Assessing a Two-Pronged Approach to Active Learning in Sport Sociology Classrooms

in Sport Management Education Journal
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $24.95

Student 1 year subscription

USD  $52.00

1 year subscription

USD  $69.00

Student 2 year subscription

USD  $98.00

2 year subscription

USD  $128.00

Active-learning research has explored 2 distinct areas: pedagogy and physical space. As existing research has most often explored only 1 area per study and few have been done in the area of sport sociology, additional research is needed. This research combined both areas of active learning through a quasi-experimental design. Using 2 different classes, Sport and Society and Gender and Sport, students were exposed to an unchanging physical space or manipulated physical space, as well as active-learning tasks of varying complexity. No differences in student perceptions of engagement or learning were found when comparing space variations; however, task complexity did lead to significant differences in student perceptions of engagement and learning.

The author is with the Sport Management Dept., St. John Fisher College, Rochester, NY. Address correspondence to edane-staples@sjfc.edu.

  • Athens, W. (2018). Perceptions of the persistent: Engagement and learning community in underrepresented populations. Online Learning Journal, 22(2), 27–58.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bodary, P.F., & Gross, M.M. (2018). Innovative teaching and learning strategies in kinesiology. Kinesiology Review, 7(4), 321–327. doi:10.1123/kr.2018-0037

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bower, G., Hums, M., & Grappendorf, H. (2015). Same story; different day: Greatest challenges of women working in intercollegiate athletic administration. International Journal of Sport Management, Recreation, & Tourism, 19, 12–39. doi:10.5199/ijsmart-1791-874X-19b

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brooks, C., & Solheim, C.A. (2014). Pedagogy matters, too: The impact of adapting teaching approaches to formal learning environments on student learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2014, 53–61. doi:10.1002/tl.20085

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Burke, L.A., Ahmadi, M., & James, K. (2009). Effectiveness of powerpoint-based lectures across different business disciplines: An investigation and implications. Journal of Education for Business, 84(4), 246–251. doi:10.3200/JOEB.84.4.246-251

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chi, M.T.H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagements to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243. doi:10.1080/00461520.2014.965823

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cotner, S., Loper, J., Walker, J.D., & Brooks, D.C. (2013). “It’s not you, it’s the room”– Are the high-tech, active learning classrooms worth it? Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(6), 82–88. doi:10.2505/4/jcst13_042_06_82

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Diacin, M.J. (2018). An experiential learning opportunity for sport management students: Manager interview and facility inspection. Sport Management Education Journal, 12(2), 114–116. doi:10.1123/smej.2017-0033

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dixson, M. (2015). Measuring student engagement in the online course: The Online Student Engagement Scale (OSE). Online Learning, 19(4), 143–157. doi:10.24059/olj.v19i4.561

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Eagleman, A.N., & McNary, E.L. (2010). What are we teaching our students? A descriptive examination of the current status of undergraduate sport management curricula in the United States. Sport Management Education Journal, 4(1), 1–17. doi:10.1123/smej.4.1.1

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Freeman, S., Eddy, S.L., McDonough, M., Smith, M.K., Okoroafor, H.J., & Wenderoth, M.P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(23), 8410–8415. PubMed ID: 24821756 doi:10.1073/pnas.1319030111

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Garrett, N. (2016). How do academic disciplines use powerpoint? Innovative Higher Education, 41, 365–380. doi:10.1007/s10755-016-9381-8

  • Ge, X., Yang, Y., Liao, L., & Wolfe, E. (2013). Perceived affordances of a technology-enhanced active learning classroom in promoting collaborative problem solving. In D.G. Sampson, J.M Spector, D. Ifenthaler, & P. Isaias (Eds.), Proceedings from IADIS 2013: International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (pp. 359–362). ISBN: 978-989-8533-18-0. Fort Worth, TX.

    • Export Citation
  • Goldspink, C., & Foster, M. (2013). A conceptual model and set of instruments for measuring student engagement in learning. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(3), 291–311. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2013.776513

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hayes Sauder, M., & Mudrick, M. (2018). Student satisfaction and perceived learning in sport management internships. Sport Management Education Journal, 12(1), 26–38. doi:10.1123/smej.2016-0032

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jankowska, M., & Atlay, M. (2008). Use of creative space in enhancing students’ engagement. Innovations in Educational and Teaching International, 45(3), 271–279. doi:10.1080/14703290802176162

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Judge, L.W., Pierce, D., Petersen, J., Bellar, D., Wanless, E., Gilreath, E., & Simon, L. (2011). Engaging experiential service learning through a co-curricular club: The Chase Charlie Races. Journal of Research in Health, Physical Education, Recreation, Sport & Dance, 6(2), 30–38.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Killian, C.M., & Woods, A.M. (2018). Expanding learning opportunities in kinesiology through the use of flipped instruction. Kinesiology Review, 7(4), 332–338. doi:10.1123/kr.2018-0046

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Komarraju, M., & Karau, S.J. (2008). Relationships between the perceived value of instructional techniques and academic motivation. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 35(1), 70–82.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Latane, B., Lou, J.H., Nowak, A., Bonevento, M., & Zheng, L. (1995). Distance matters: Physical space and social impact. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(8), 795–805. doi:10.1177/0146167295218002

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lei, S.A. (2010). Classroom physical design influencing student learning and evaluations of college instructors: A review of literature. Education, 131(1), 128–134.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lumpkin, A., & Achen, R.M. (2015). Flipping a class: Active learning and more of it. Sport Management Education Journal, 9(2), 79–90. doi:10.1123/SMEJ.2014-0042

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lumpkin, A., Achen, R.M., & Dodd, R. (2015a). Focusing teaching on students: Examining student perceptions of learning strategies. Quest, 67(4), 352–366. doi:10.1080/00336297.2015.1082143

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lumpkin, A., Achen, R.M., & Dodd, R.K. (2015b). Student perceptions of active learning. College Student Journal, 49(1), 121–133.

  • Madden, J., Wilks, J., Marone, M., Loader, N., & Robinson, N. (2012). Journeying together: Understanding the process of teacher change and the impacts on student learning. ISEA, 40(2), 19–35.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mangram, J.A., Haddix, M., Ochanji, M.K., & Masingila, J. (2015). Active learning strategies for complementing the lecture teaching methods in large classes in higher education. Journal of Instructional Research, 4, 57–68. doi:10.9743/JIR.2015.8

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Metzger, K.J. (2015). Collaborative teaching practices in undergraduate active learning classrooms: A report of faculty team teaching models and student reflections from two biology courses. Collaborative Teaching Practices, 41(1), 3–9.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Miller, C.J., & Metz, M.J. (2014). Barriers to the use of research-based instructional strategies: The influence of both individual and situational characteristics. Physical Review Special Topics– Physics Education Research, 3(2), 020102. PubMed ID: 30305918

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Monson, A. (2005). Active learning survey (Unpublished manuscript). Department of Dental Hygiene, Minnesota State University, Mankato.

  • Noel, D., Stover, S., & McNutt, M. (2015). Student perceptions of engagement using mobile-based polling as an audience response system: Implications for leadership studies. Journal of Leadership Education, 14(3), 53–70. doi:10.12806/V14/I3/R4

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Park, E.L., & Choi, B.K. (2014). Transformation of classroom spaces: Traditional versus active learning classrooms in colleges. Higher Education, 68, 749–771. doi:10.1007/s10734-014-9742-0

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Parr, B.B. (2013, July 17). Active voice: Team-based learning in exercise science education. Sports Medicine Bulletin, 1.

  • Pate, J.R., & Shonk, D.J. (2015). An experiential learning trip: Exploring student experiences and motivations for volunteering at the super bowl. Sport Management Education Journal, 9(1), 11–24. doi:10.1123/smej.2014-0001

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Patrick, L.E., Howell, L.A., & Wischusen, W. (2016). Perceptions of active learning between faculty and undergraduates: Differing views among departments. Journal of STEM Education, 17(3), 55–63.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Petersen, C.I., & Gorman, K.S. (2014). Strategies to address common challenges when teaching in an active learning classroom. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2014, 63–70. doi:10.1002/tl.20086

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Safer, A.M., Farmer, L.S.J., Segalla, A., & Elhoubi, A.F. (2005). Does the distance from the teacher influence student evaluations? Educational Research Quarterly, 28(3), 28–35.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, G.A. (2015). Why college faculty need to know the research about learning. InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 10, 9–18.

  • Van Amburgh, J.A.V., Devlin, J.W., Kirwin, J.L., & Qualters, D.M., (2007). A tool for measuring active learning in the classroom. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 71(5), 1–8.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • van den Berg, Y.H.M., & Cillessen, A.H.N. (2015). Peer status and classroom seating arrangements: A social relations analysis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 130, 19–34. PubMed ID: 25313926 doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2014.09.007

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Van Note Chism, N. (2002). A tale of two classrooms. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2002, 5–12. doi:10.1002/tl.74

  • Yew, T.M., Dagwood, F.K.P., Narayanganj, K., Kampala, M., Jen, L.S., & Hoya, K.C. (2016). Stimulating deep learning using active learning techniques. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(3), 49–57.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zandvliet, D., & Broekhuizen, A. (2017). Spaces for learning: Development and validation of the school physical and campus environment survey. Learning Environment Research, 20, 175–187. doi:10.1007/s10984-017-9228-y

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 439 439 72
Full Text Views 13 13 0
PDF Downloads 4 4 0