Controversial Topics in the Classroom: Debates on Ethical Issues in Sport

in Sport Management Education Journal

Click name to view affiliation

Megan B. Shreffler University of Louisville

Search for other papers by Megan B. Shreffler in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
*
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1123/smej.2019-0022
Keywords:
active learning; controversy; student engagement
First Published Online:
04 Mar 2020
In Print:
Volume 14: Issue 1
Page Range:
61–63
Restricted access

A number of benefits have been associated with discussing controversial topics in the classroom. In this article, the author provides an example of using classroom debates on controversial issues in sport as a learning method in an introductory sport management class. Students were assigned to a side of a topic on which they did not agree. This required them to critically think about their stance and seek information to understand why others might feel the way they do. After the debate, students completed a debate reaction paper in which they outlined their opinions not only about the topic but also about the process.

The author is with the University of Louisville, Louisville, KY.

Address correspondence to megan.shreffler@louisville.edu.
  • Collapse
  • Expand

Sport Management Education Journal

Cover Sport Management Education Journal

  • Asimeng-Boahene, L. (2007). Creating strategies to deal with problems of teaching controversial issues in social studies education in African schools. Intercultural Education, 18, 231–242. doi:10.1080/14675980701463588

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Byford, J., Lennon, S., & Russell, W.B. (2009). Teaching controversial issues in the social studies: A research study of high school teachers. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 82(4), 165–170. doi:10.3200/TCHS.82.4.165-170

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ersoy, A.F. (2010). Social studies teacher candidates’ views on the controversial issues incorporated into their courses in Turkey. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 323–334. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.09.015

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hess, D.E. (2008). Controversial issues and democratic discourse. In L.S. Levstik & C.A. Tyson (Eds.), Handbook of research in social studies education (pp. 124–136). New York, NY: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hess, D.E., & McAvoy, P. (2015). The political classroom: Evidence and ethics in democratic education. New York, NY: Routledge.

  • Jansen, J. (2009). Knowing in the blood: Confronting race and the apartheid past. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

  • Jones, B.A., Arcelus, J., Bouman, W.P., & Haycraft, E. (2017). Sport and transgender people: A systematic review of the literature relating to sport participation and competitive sport policies. Sports Medicine, 47(4), 701–716. PubMed ID: 27699698 doi:10.1007/s40279-016-0621-y

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Reel, J.J., & Crouch, E. (2018). #MeToo: Uncovering sexual harassment and assault in sport. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology, 13(2), 177–179. doi:10.1123/jcsp.2018-0078

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Roy, A., & Macchiette, B. (2005). Debating the issues: A tool for augmenting critical thinking skills of marketing students. Journal of Marketing Education, 27(3), 264–276. doi:10.1177/0273475305280533

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Russell, W., Pellegrino, A., & Byford, J. (2007). High school students and their political views. The National Social Science Journal, 28(1), 92–96.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Scott, S. (2008). Perceptions of students’ learning critical thinking through debate in a technology classroom: A case study. Journal of Technology Studies, 34(1), 39–44.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Soley, M. (1996). If it’s controversial, why teach it? Social Education, 60(1), 9–14.

  • Walker, S., & Gazzillo Diaz, L. (2003). Promoting critical thinking in the classroom. Athletic Therapy Today, 8(5), 64–65.

  • Zembylas, M., & Kambani, F. (2012). The teaching of controversial issues during elementary-level history instruction: Greek-Cypriot teachers’ perceptions and emotions. Theory & Research in Social Education, 40, 107–133. doi:10.1080/00933104.2012.670591

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zimmerman, J., & Robertson, E. (2017). The case for contention: Teaching controversial issues in American schools. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 4281 674 21
Full Text Views 74 9 1
PDF Downloads 57 16 1