Implications and Opportunities for Sport Management Education in the COVID-19 Era

in Sport Management Education Journal
View More View Less
  • 1 University of Portsmouth
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $24.95

Student 1 year online subscription

USD  $53.00

1 year online subscription

USD  $70.00

Student 2 year online subscription

USD  $100.00

2 year online subscription

USD  $134.00

In December 2019, a novel coronavirus (COVID-19) was detected in three patients from the city of Wuhan, China. By January 2020, COVID-19 was declared a widespread pandemic creating a global health crisis, resulting in millions of people contracting the virus and thousands losing their lives. Alongside the wide-reaching health crisis, the impact of COVID-19 had significant economic and societal effects leaving a historical legacy, which will affect countries throughout the world for a considerable period of time. As COVID-19 spread around the globe, the way people socialize, work, and study essentially changed forever. Therefore, this essay provides an insight into the rapid process that universities across the globe undertook to transition their teaching operations online. Projects and pedagogic reviews that traditionally would have taken months or years to devise were compressed into days, as the pandemic necessitated that traditional concerns about online teaching were cast aside. Consequently, this essay discusses these new educational platforms in sport management education and their future role in developing professionals who will be at the forefront of an unprecedented industry growth in the years and decades after COVID-19.

The authors are with the School of Sport, Health and Exercise Science, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.

Rayner (mike.rayner@port.ac.uk) is corresponding author.
  • Allen, I.E., & Seaman, J. (2011). Going the distance: Online education in the United States, 2011. Sloan Consortium.

  • Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 117. doi:10.24059/olj.v5i2.1875

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Angiello, R. (2010). Study looks at online learning vs. traditional instruction. The Hispanic Outlook in Higher Education, 20(14), 1820.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Aoun, J. (2017). Robot-proof: Higher education in the age of artificial intelligence. MIT Press.

  • Baran, E., Correia, AP., & Thompson, A. (2011). Transforming online teaching practice: Critical analysis of the literature on the roles and competencies of online teachers. Distance Education, 32(3), 421439. doi:10.1080/01587919.2011.610293

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bennett, S., & Lockyer, L. (2004). Becoming an online teacher: Adapting to a changed environment for teaching and learning in higher education. Educational Media International, 41(3), 231248. doi:10.1080/09523980410001680842

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Berge, Z.L. (2008). Changing instructor’s roles in virtual worlds. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 9(4), 407414.

  • Bigatel, P.M., Ragan, L.C., Kenan, S., May, J., & Redmond, B.F. (2012). The identification of competencies for online teaching success. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(1), 5977. doi:10.24059/olj.v16i1.215

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bird, M., Chow, G., Meir, G., & Freeman, J. (2018). Student-athlete and student non-athletes’ stigma and attitudes toward seeking online and face-to-face counselling. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology, 12(3), 347364 doi:10.1123/jcsp.2017-0010

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bothwell, E. (2020). UK universities favour a blended learning approach for 2020–21. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/uk-universities-favour-blended-learning-approach-2020-21

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dinmore, S. (2019). Beyond lecture capture: Creating digital video content for online learning—A case study. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 16(1), 7.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Edwards, A., & Finger, G. (2007). eLearning and sport management: Hyperpedagogy possibilities. Sport Management Review, 10(2), 191208. doi:10.1016/S1441-3523(07)70011-6

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Feintuch, H. (2010). Keeping their distance. Diverse: Issues in Higher Education, 27(3), 20.

  • Galvis, A.H. (2018). Supporting decision-making processes on blended learning in higher education: Literature and good practices review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 25. doi:10.1186/s41239-018-0106-1

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gikandi, J., & Morrow, D. (2016). Designing and implementing peer formative feedback within online learning environments. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 25(2), 153170. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2015.1058853

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Glover, L.C., & Lewis, E.V. (2012). Student preference online versus traditional courses. The Global eLearning Journal, 1(3), 128.

  • Harrolle, M., Bopp, T., Keiper, P., Ridinger, L., & Ryan, T. (2013, May). Online learning is here to stay! Sport management and distance education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the North American Society for Sport Management Conference, Austin, TX.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Housekeeper, E. (2015). Online courses gain momentum among student athletes. UVM OutReach. https://learn.uvm.edu/blog-education/uvmonline-courses-for-athletes-gain-momentum

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jump, P. (2020). THE Leaders Survey: Will COVID-19 leave universities in intensive care? https://www.timeshighereducation.com/features/leaders-survey-will-covid-19-leave-universities-intensive-care#

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Keiper, M., & Jenny, S. (2017). Pedagogical innovations for the millennial sport management student: Socrative and Twitter. Sport Management Education Journal, 11(1), 4554. doi:10.1123/smej.2016-0014

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Khan, K., & Badii, A. (2012). Impact of e-learning on higher education: Development of an e-learning framework. Life Science Journal, 9(4), 40734082.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lee, M.H., & Tsai, C.C. (2010). Exploring teachers’ perceived self efficacy and technological pedagogical content knowledge with respect to educational use of the World Wide Web. Instructional Science, 38(1), 121. doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9075-4

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lim, M. (2020). Education despite the COVID-19 outbreak: Lessons from Singapore. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/blog/educating-despite-covid-19-outbreak-lessons-singapore

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lowenthal, P., Bauer, C., & Chen, K. (2015). Student perceptions of online learning: An analysis of online course evaluations. American Journal of Distance Education, 29(2), 8597. doi:10.1080/08923647.2015.1023621

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Major, C. (2010). Do virtual professors dream of electric students? College faculty experiences with online distance education. Teachers College Record, 112(8), 21542208. http://www.tcrecord.org

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marshall, S.J. (2018). Shaping the university of the future: Using technology to catalyse change in university learning and teaching. Springer Nature.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Martin, F., & Bolliger, D.U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205222. doi:10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Martin, F., Budhrani, K., Kumar, S., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2019). Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: Roles and competencies. Online Learning, 23(1), 184205. doi:10.24059/olj.v23i1.1329

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Martin, F., Wang, C., & Sadaf, A. (2020). Facilitation matters: Instructor perception of helpfulness of facilitation strategies in online courses. Online Learning, 24(1), 2849. doi:10.24059/olj.v24i1.1980

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Martinez, J.M., & Barnhill, C.R. (2017). Enhancing the student experience in online sport management programs: A review of the community of inquiry framework. Sport Management Education Journal, 11(1), 2433. doi:10.1123/smej.2016-0009

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McNiff, J., & Aicher, T.J. (2017). Understanding the challenges and opportunities associated with online learning: A scaffolding theory approach. Sport Management Education Journal, 11(1), 1323. doi:10.1123/smej.2016-0007

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Means, B., Bakia, M., & Murphy, R. (2014). Learning online: What research tells us about whether, when and how. Routledge.

  • Meiselwitz, G., & Sadera, W. (2008). Investigating the connection between usability and learning outcomes in online learning environments. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 4(2), 9.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Miller, J., & Pierce, D. (2017). Online learning in sport management education: Guest editors’ Introduction. Sport Management Education Journal, 11(1), 12. doi:10.1123/smej.2017-0004

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Milman, N. (2020). This is emergency remote teaching, not just online teaching. https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2020/03/30/this-is-emergency-remote-teaching-not-just.html

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Natriello, G. (2005). Modest changes, revolutionary possibilities: Distance learning and the future of education. Teachers College Record, 107(8), 18851904. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00545.x

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • The Open University. (2020, April 30). Open University digital archive. https://www.open.ac.uk/library/digital-archive/

  • Porter, W.W., Graham, C.R., Spring, K.A., & Welch, K.R. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Institutional adoption and implementation. Computers & Education, 75, 185195. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.011

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reimann, T., Liedl, R., & Schellhammer, K.S. (2019). Using blended learning to redesign a groundwater management lecture series: Benefits and outcome. Grundwasser, 24(3), 177184.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rockhill, C., Pastore, D., & Johnson, D. (2019). The effectiveness of podcasts in sport management education. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 25, 100211. doi:10.1016/j.jhlste.2019.100211

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shreffler, M.B., Cocco, A.R., & Shreffler, J.R. (2019). An examination of the relationship between instruction type and course outcomes in sport management courses. Sport Management Education Journal, 13(2), 5362. doi:10.1123/smej.2018-0014

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stewart, C., & Bower, M. (2019). Novice online educator conceptual frameworks: A mental model exploration of mindful learning design. Education Media International, 56(1), 1443. doi:10.1080/09523987.2019.1583463

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Szeto, E., & Cheng, A. (2016). Towards a framework of interactions in a blended synchronous learning environment: What effects are there on a students’ social presence experience? Interactive Learning Environments, 24(3), 487503. doi:10.1080/10494820.2014.881391

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Taylor, C. (2020). Re-imagining decision making, after COVID-19. https://wonkhe.com/blogs/re-imagining-decision-making-after-covid-19/

  • University and Colleges Admissions Service. (n.d.). Sport management courses. +https://www.ucas.com/search/explore?keywords=sport+management

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • University of Portsmouth. (2020 ). Our strategy. https://www.port.ac.uk/about-us/our-ambition/our-strategy

  • Weinbren, D. (2014). The open university: A history. Manchester University Press.

  • Willett, J., Brown, C., & Danzy-Bussell, L.A. (2019). An exploratory study: Faculty perceptions of online learning in undergraduate sport management programs. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 25, 100206. doi:10.1016/j.jhlste.2019.100206

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yamagata-Lynch, L.C. (2014). Blending online asynchronous and synchronous learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(2), 189212. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1778

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zimmerman, J. (2020). Coronavirus and the great online-learning experiment. https://www.chronicle.com/article/Coronavirusthe-Great/248216/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 203 203 108
Full Text Views 15 15 6
PDF Downloads 12 12 5