Maori Women and Positional Segregation in New Zealand Netball: Another Test of the Anglocentric Hypothesis

in Sociology of Sport Journal
View More View Less
  • 1 State University of New York, College, Brockport
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $24.95

Student 1 year online subscription

USD  $65.00

1 year online subscription

USD  $87.00

Student 2 year online subscription

USD  $123.00

2 year online subscription

USD  $165.00

In order to test Hallinan’s “Anglocentric Hypothesis,” New Zealand head coaches of female netball union teams completed two mailed questionnaires. The statistical analysis was based on 177 European (69.1%) and 79 Maori (30.9%) players. An overall chi-square for Race x Playing Position was nonsignificant, χ2(6) = 8.40. Specifically, Europeans were nonsignificantly overrepresented at center, the most central, highest interacting position. Occupancy of the most tactically important playing position, goal defense, also did not significantly vary by race. Lastly, goal shoot, the position judged by the coaches as being highest in outcome control, also did not favor either race. The results are discussed in terms of the historical record of Maori women’s participation in netball, majority–minority relations in New Zealand, and several methodological issues and concerns that attend “stacking” investigations.

Merrill J. Melnick is with the Department of Physical Education and Sport at the State University of New York, College at Brockport, Brockport, New York 14420.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 207 121 35
Full Text Views 6 5 1
PDF Downloads 8 6 0