Telling the Truth in Public Policy: An Analysis of New Zealand Sport Policy Discourse

in Sociology of Sport Journal
View More View Less
  • 1 Unitec Institute of Technology
  • 2 University of Otago
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $24.95

Student 1 year online subscription

USD  $65.00

1 year online subscription

USD  $87.00

Student 2 year online subscription

USD  $123.00

2 year online subscription

USD  $165.00

In this article we use Foucault’s conception of games of truth to investigate how truth in public policy is rhetorically constructed through the notion of “transparency.” Data was collected from various public sources regarding a medal target policy promoted by Sport and Recreation New Zealand (Sparc) for the national team at the 2006 Commonwealth Games. By analyzing the multifarious rhetoric surrounding the medal target policy, we show that the notion of transparency, although ostensibly appealing and helpful as a mechanism to justify goals, exposes inherent contradictions that were counter to Sparc’s goals. The discussion encourages scholars and practitioners to conceive of policy as ongoing contests over truth. We suggest that practitioners might benefit from considering the problematic implications of promoting “transparent” public policy.

Piggin is with Unitec New Zealand, School of Sport, Carrington Rd, Mt Albert, Auckland, 1025, New Zealand, jpiggin@unitec.ac.nz; Jackson is with the School of Physical Education (steve.jackson@otago.ac.nz) and Lewis is with the Department of Management (MLewis@business.otago.ac.nz) at the University of Otago, Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 228 190 4
Full Text Views 22 10 2
PDF Downloads 22 6 1