Private and Moral Authority, Self-Determination, and the Domestic Transfer Objective: Foundations for Understanding Sport for Development and Peace in Aboriginal Communities in Canada

in Sociology of Sport Journal

Click name to view affiliation

Lyndsay M.C. HayhurstUniversity of British Columbia

Search for other papers by Lyndsay M.C. Hayhurst in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Audrey GilesUniversity of Ottawa

Search for other papers by Audrey Giles in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Sport for development and peace (SDP) is a contemporary term for practices that have a long history, particularly in Canada’s provincial and territorial north, and especially with Aboriginal peoples for whom the region is home. Using a postcolonial international relations feminist approach, theories of global governance and private authority, and by exploring recent literature on self-determination in the context of Aboriginal peoples, we investigate 1) the assumptions at work in attempts to “transfer” SDP programming models in the Two-Thirds World to Aboriginal communities across Canada; 2) how the retreat of the welfare state and neo-liberal policies have produced the “need” for SDP in Aboriginal communities; and 3) how efforts toward Aboriginal self-determination can be made through SDP. We argue that, taken together, these concepts build a useful foundation better understanding for the historical and sociopolitical processes involved in deploying SDP interventions in Aboriginal communities.

Hayhurst is with the Liu Institute for Global Issues, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada. Giles is with the School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1788 957 17
Full Text Views 154 38 4
PDF Downloads 171 39 1