Testing the Predictions of the Cusp Catastrophe Model of Anxiety and Performance

in The Sport Psychologist
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD $24.95

Student 1 year subscription

USD $68.00

1 year subscription

USD $90.00

Student 2 year subscription

USD $129.00

2 year subscription

USD $168.00

Hardy and Fazey’s (1987) cusp catastrophe model of anxiety and performance has been criticized for being overly complex and difficult to test. The present paper attempts to clarify the model for researchers who are less familiar with its more subtle nuances; it then differentiates between the characteristics of cusp catastrophe models in general and the specific predictions of Hardy and Fazey’s cusp catastrophe model of anxiety and performance. For each prediction, methodological and statistical procedures are suggested whereby the prediction can be tested, and the available evidence that has used these procedures is then briefly reviewed. Some of the practical implications of the cusp catastrophe model for best practice are also discussed.

Lew Hardy is with the Division of Health and Human Performance at the University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2DG, United Kingdom.

The Sport Psychologist
Article Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 141 141 62
Full Text Views 34 34 16
PDF Downloads 57 57 33
Altmetric Badge
PubMed
Google Scholar
Cited By