Work-Life Balance, Role Conflict and the UK Sport Psychology Consultant

in The Sport Psychologist
View More View Less
  • 1 University of Kent
  • 2 St. Mary’s University College
  • 3 Aberystwyth University
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $24.95

Student 1 year online subscription

USD  $69.00

1 year online subscription

USD  $92.00

Student 2 year online subscription

USD  $131.00

2 year online subscription

USD  $175.00

To date there has not been a comprehensive discussion in the literature of work-life balance for the sport psychology consultant. The number and complexity of roles often undertaken by consultants may lead to potential stress if roles conflict. Underpinned by Role Theory (Kahn, Wolfe, Quinn, Snoek, & Rosenthal, 1964) and the Spillover Hypothesis (Staines, 1980) this paper draws on the work-life balance literature to present the potential conflicts and ethical dilemmas experienced by the sport psychology consultant as a result of conducting multiple roles. With an applied focus, ways of obtaining work-life balance are suggested through a psychological model outlining personal organizational skills, ongoing supervision/mentoring and reflective practice, and safeguarding leisure time. While certain aspects of the model are built on the UK experience, many of the suggestions will be applicable to sport psychology consultants regardless of their location. Ideas for future research directions involving exploring conflicting roles, work-life balance and coping issues for the sport psychology consultant are presented.

Waumsley is with the Centre for Sports Studies, University of Kent at Medway, Kent, UK. Hemmings is with the Div. of Human Sciences, St. Mary’s University College, Twickenham, UK. Payne is with the Dept. of Sport and Exercise Science, Aberystwyth University, Penglais Campus, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, UK.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 401 292 38
Full Text Views 41 27 1
PDF Downloads 65 41 2