Qualitative Research in Sport Psychology Journals: The Next Decade 2000-2009 and Beyond

in The Sport Psychologist
View More View Less
  • 1 University of Ottawa
  • 2 California State University – Fresno
  • 3 Liverpool John Moores University
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $24.95

Student 1 year online subscription

USD  $69.00

1 year online subscription

USD  $92.00

Student 2 year online subscription

USD  $131.00

2 year online subscription

USD  $175.00

A follow-up of the 1990s review of qualitative research articles published in three North American sport psychology journals (Culver, Gilbert, & Trudel, 2003) was conducted for the years 2000–2009. Of the 1,324 articles published, 631 were data-based and 183 of these used qualitative data collection techniques; an increase from 17.3% for the 1990s to 29.0% for this last decade. Of these, 31.1% employed mixed methods compared with 38.1% in the 1990s. Interviews were used in 143 of the 183 qualitative studies and reliability test reporting increased from 45.2% to 82.2%. Authors using exclusively quotations to present their results doubled from 17.9% to 39.9%. Only 13.7% of the authors took an epistemological stance, while 26.2% stated their methodological approach. We conclude that positivist/postpositivist approaches appear to maintain a predominant position in sport psychology research. Awareness of the importance of being clear about epistemology and methodology should be a goal for all researchers.

Culver is with the School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Gilbert is with the Dept. of Kinesiology, California State University - Fresno, Fresno, CA. Sparkes is with the Faculty of Education, Community, and Leisure, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1030 743 79
Full Text Views 112 74 21
PDF Downloads 141 97 32