Shared Responsibility: A Case of and for “Real Life” Ethical Decision-Making in Sport Psychology

in The Sport Psychologist
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD $24.95

Student 1 year subscription

USD $68.00

1 year subscription

USD $90.00

Student 2 year subscription

USD $129.00

2 year subscription

USD $168.00

In this paper, we examine a case of “real life” ethical decision-making in sport psychology that occurred in the context of a symposium on sexual transgressions in sport, conducted during a recent professional conference. We use autoethnography (Ellis, 2004), an emergent qualitative methodology combining both literary and ethnographic techniques. In this case study, we analyze the unique perspectives of three key participants to make sense of what happened, why it happened, and how we can avoid similar instances in the future. We theorize and politicize the larger master narratives, which revolved around power, space, time, and symbolic violence. We conclude with recommendations for our sport psychology colleagues related to ethical decision-making, organizational planning of conferences, and being an ally to survivors of sexual abuse.

Dzikus and Fisher are with the Dept. of Kinesiology, Recreation, and Sport Studies, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN. Hays is with The Performing Edge, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

The Sport Psychologist
Article Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 19 19 10
Full Text Views 8 8 8
PDF Downloads 9 9 9
Altmetric Badge
PubMed
Google Scholar