A Preliminary Survey of Interpersonal Conflict at Major Games and Championships

in The Sport Psychologist

Click name to view affiliation

Stephen MellalieuSwansea University

Search for other papers by Stephen Mellalieu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
David A. ShearerUniversity of Glamorgan

Search for other papers by David A. Shearer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Catherine ShearerSportWales

Search for other papers by Catherine Shearer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Interpersonal conflict is a common factor reported by governing bodies and their athletes when preparing for, or competing in, major games and championships (Olusoga, Butt, Hays, & Maynard, 2009). The aim of this study was to conduct a preliminary exploration of a UK home nation’s athletes, management, and support staff experiences of interpersonal conflict during competition. Ninety participants who had represented or worked for their nation at major games or championships completed a detailed survey of interpersonal conflict experiences associated with competition. The results suggest athletes, coaches, and team managers are at the greatest risk from interpersonal conflict, while the competition venue and athlete village are where the most incidences of conflict occur. Interpersonal conflict was also suggested to predominantly lead to negative cognitive, affective, and behavioral consequences (disagreement, anger, upset, loss in concentration). Findings are discussed in the context of the experience of the interpersonal conflict with provisional recommendations offered for developing effective strategies for conflict management.

Mellalieu is with the Dept. of Sports Science, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom. D. Shearer is with the Dept. of Psychology, University of Glamorgan, Pontypridd, Rhondda Cynon Taff, United Kingdom. C. Shearer is with the Sports Science Dept., SportWales, Cardiff, United Kingdom.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 2127 917 22
Full Text Views 206 24 18
PDF Downloads 238 28 25