To Focus or Not to Focus: Is Attention on the Core Components of Action Beneficial for Cycling Performance?

in The Sport Psychologist

Click name to view affiliation

Maurizio BertolloUniversity “G. d'Annunzio” of Chieti-Pescara

Search for other papers by Maurizio Bertollo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Selenia di FronsoUniversity “G. d'Annunzio” of Chieti-Pescara

Search for other papers by Selenia di Fronso in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Edson FilhoUniversity of Central Lancashire

Search for other papers by Edson Filho in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Vito LambertiUniversity “G. d'Annunzio” of Chieti-Pescara

Search for other papers by Vito Lamberti in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Patrizio RipariUniversity “G. d'Annunzio” of Chieti-Pescara

Search for other papers by Patrizio Ripari in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Victor Machado ReisUniversity of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro

Search for other papers by Victor Machado Reis in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Silvia ComaniUniversity “G. d'Annunzio” of Chieti-Pescara

Search for other papers by Silvia Comani in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Laura BortoliUniversity “G. d'Annunzio” of Chieti-Pescara

Search for other papers by Laura Bortoli in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Claudio RobazzaUniversity “G. d'Annunzio” of Chieti-Pescara

Search for other papers by Claudio Robazza in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

We conducted a counterbalanced repeated measure trial to investigate the effect of different internal and external associative strategies on endurance performance. Seventeen college-aged students were randomly assigned to three experimental conditions to test the notion that different attention-performance types (optimal Type 1, functional Type 2, and dysfunctional Type 3) would influence endurance time on a cycling task. Specifically, Type 1 represented an effortless and automatic, “flow-feeling” attentional mode. Type 2 referred to an associative focus directed at core components of the task. Type 3 represented an attentional focus directed at irrelevant components of the task. Participants completed three time-to-exhaustion-tests while reporting their perceived exertion and affective states (arousal and hedonic tone). Results revealed that Type 1 and Type 2 attentional strategies, compared with Type 3 strategy, exerted functional effects on performance, whereas a Type 3 strategy was linked to lower performance, and lower levels of arousal and pleasantness. Applied implications are discussed.

Bertollo, di Fronso, Comani, Bortoli and Robazza are with the Behavioral Imaging and Neural Dynamics Center, Dept. of Medicine and Aging Sciences, University “G. d’Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy; Edson Filho is with School of Psychology, University of Central Lacashire, Preston, UK; Lamberti and Ripari are with the of Dept. of Clinical and Experimental Science, University G. d’Annunzio Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy; Machado is with the School of Life Sciences and the Environment, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal. Address author correspondence to Maurizio Bertollo at m.bertollo@unich.it.

  • Collapse
  • Expand