In previous research, multiple demands and consequences were manipulated simultaneously to examine methods for pressure training. Building on literature, in this study a single demand or consequence stressor was manipulated in isolation. Specifically, in a matched within-subject design, 6 international shooters (mean age 28.67 yr) performed a shooting task while exposed to a single demand (task, performer, environmental) or consequence (reward, forfeit, judgment) stressor. Perceived pressure, anxiety (intensity and direction), and performance were measured. Compared with baseline, manipulating demands did not affect pressure or anxiety. In contrast, pressure and cognitive anxiety significantly increased when judgment or forfeit consequence stressors were introduced. Thus, the findings lack support for manipulating demands but strongly support introducing consequences when pressure training. Compared with baseline, the judgment stressor also created debilitative anxiety. Hence, in terms of introducing a single stressor, judgment appeared most impactful and may be most effective for certain athlete populations.
Stoker, Hays, and Hughes are with Performance Psychology, English Inst. of Sport, Sheffield, United Kingdom. Maynard is with the University of Essex, Essex, United Kingdom. Butt is with Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
BaumeisterR.F. (1984). Choking under pressure: Self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology46610–620. PubMed ID: 6707866 doi:10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.2060
BellJ.J.HardyL. & BeattieS. (2013). Enhancing mental toughness and performance under pressure in elite young cricketers: A 2-year longitudinal intervention. Sport Exercise and Performance Psychology2(4) 281–297. doi:10.1037/a0033129
Bell, J.J., Hardy, L., & Beattie, S. (2013). Enhancing mental toughness and performance under pressure in elite young cricketers: A 2-year longitudinal intervention. 2(4), 281–297. doi:10.1037/a003312910.1037/a0033129)| false
DriskellJ.E. & JohnstonJ.H. (1998). Stress exposure training. In J.A.Cannon-Bowers & E.Salas (Eds.) Making decisions under stress: Implications for individual and team training (pp. 191–217). Washington, DC: APA Press.
DriskellT.SclafaniS. & DriskellJ.E. (2014). Reducing the effects of game day pressures through stress exposure training. Journal of Sport Psychology in Action5(1) 28–43. doi:10.1080/21520704.2013.866603
Driskell, T., Sclafani, S., & Driskell, J.E. (2014). Reducing the effects of game day pressures through stress exposure training. 5(1), 28–43. doi:10.1080/21520704.2013.86660310.1080/21520704.2013.866603)| false
KinradeN.P.JacksonR.C. & AshfordK.J. (2015). Reinvestment, task complexity and decision making under pressure in basketball. Psychology of Sport and Exercise2011–19. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.03.007
KnickerA.J.RenshawI.OldhamA.R. & CairnsS.P. (2011). Interactive processes link the multiple symptoms of fatigue in sport competition. Sports Medicine41307–328. PubMed ID: 21425889 doi:10.2165/11586070-000000000-00000
Knicker, A.J., Renshaw, I., Oldham, A.R., & Cairns, S.P. (2011). Interactive processes link the multiple symptoms of fatigue in sport competition. 41,307–328. PubMed ID: 21425889 doi:10.2165/11586070-000000000-0000010.2165/11586070-000000000-00000)| false
LawrenceG.P.CassellV.E.BeattieS.WoodmanT.KhanM.A.HardyL. & GottwaldV.M. (2014). Practice with anxiety improves performance, but only when anxious: Evidence for the specificity of practice hypothesis. Psychological Research78(5) 634–650. PubMed ID: 24162389 doi:10.1007/s00426-013-0521-9
Lawrence, G.P., Cassell, V.E., Beattie, S., Woodman, T., Khan, M.A., Hardy, L., & Gottwald, V.M. (2014). Practice with anxiety improves performance, but only when anxious: Evidence for the specificity of practice hypothesis. 78(5), 634–650. PubMed ID: 24162389 doi:10.1007/s00426-013-0521-910.1007/s00426-013-0521-9)| false
MesagnoC.HarveyJ.T. & JanelleC.M. (2011). Self-presentation origins of choking: Evidence from separate pressure manipulations. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology33441–459. PubMed ID: 21659672 doi:10.1123/jsep.33.3.441
OudejansR.R. & PijpersJ.R. (2009). Training with anxiety has a positive effect on expert perceptual-motor performance under pressure. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology621631–1647. PubMed ID: 19123115 doi:10.1080/17470210802557702
Oudejans, R.R., & Pijpers, J.R. (2009). Training with anxiety has a positive effect on expert perceptual-motor performance under pressure. 62,1631–1647. PubMed ID: 19123115 doi:10.1080/1747021080255770210.1080/17470210802557702)| false
ReevesJ.L.TenenbaumG. & LidorR. (2007). Choking in front of the goal: The effects of self‐consciousness training. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology5(3) 240–254. doi:10.1080/1612197X.2007.9671834
Reeves, J.L., Tenenbaum, G., & Lidor, R. (2007). Choking in front of the goal: The effects of self‐consciousness training. 5(3), 240–254. doi:10.1080/1612197X.2007.967183410.1080/1612197X.2007.9671834)| false
StokerM.MaynardI.ButtJ.HaysK.LindsayP. & NorenbergD.A. (2017). The effect of manipulating training demands and consequences on experiences of pressure in elite netball. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology29(4) 434–448. doi:10.1080/10413200.2017.1298166
Stoker, M., Maynard, I., Butt, J., Hays, K., Lindsay, P., & Norenberg, D.A. (2017). The effect of manipulating training demands and consequences on experiences of pressure in elite netball. 29(4), 434–448. doi:10.1080/10413200.2017.129816610.1080/10413200.2017.1298166)| false
WilliamsS.E.CummingJ. & BalanosG.M. (2010). The use of imagery to manipulate challenge and threat appraisal states in athletes. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology32(3) 339–358. PubMed ID: 20587822 doi:10.1123/jsep.32.3.339
Williams, S.E., Cumming, J., & Balanos, G.M. (2010). The use of imagery to manipulate challenge and threat appraisal states in athletes. 32(3), 339–358. PubMed ID: 20587822 doi:10.1123/jsep.32.3.33910.1123/jsep.32.3.339)| false