The Effect of Manipulating Individual Consequences and Training Demands on Experiences of Pressure With Elite Disability Shooters
in The Sport PsychologistClick name to view affiliation
Search for other papers by Mike Stoker in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ian Maynard in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Joanne Butt in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kate Hays in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Paul Hughes in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
In previous research, multiple demands and consequences were manipulated simultaneously to examine methods for pressure training. Building on literature, in this study a single demand or consequence stressor was manipulated in isolation. Specifically, in a matched within-subject design, 6 international shooters (mean age 28.67 yr) performed a shooting task while exposed to a single demand (task, performer, environmental) or consequence (reward, forfeit, judgment) stressor. Perceived pressure, anxiety (intensity and direction), and performance were measured. Compared with baseline, manipulating demands did not affect pressure or anxiety. In contrast, pressure and cognitive anxiety significantly increased when judgment or forfeit consequence stressors were introduced. Thus, the findings lack support for manipulating demands but strongly support introducing consequences when pressure training. Compared with baseline, the judgment stressor also created debilitative anxiety. Hence, in terms of introducing a single stressor, judgment appeared most impactful and may be most effective for certain athlete populations.
Stoker, Hays, and Hughes are with Performance Psychology, English Inst. of Sport, Sheffield, United Kingdom. Maynard is with the University of Essex, Essex, United Kingdom. Butt is with Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
© 2023 Human Kinetics