Manipulated Outcome Expectations and Competitive Performance in Motor Tasks with Gradually Increasing Difficulty

in The Sport Psychologist
View More View Less
  • 1 Wingate Institute
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $24.95

Student 1 year online subscription

USD  $69.00

1 year online subscription

USD  $92.00

Student 2 year online subscription

USD  $131.00

2 year online subscription

USD  $175.00

The aim of this study was to examine whether outcome expectations can be generalized from one defined task to other tasks. A deception paradigm was employed in which outcome expectations were manipulated. High, low, or medium expectations toward performing five tasks, which gradually increased in complexity and shared a common skill, were manipulated. Ninety adult males were randomly assigned to manipulation groups. A within-subjects repeated measures ANOVA indicated that those manipulated by medium expectations showed elevated perceptions of outcome expectations. Their performance, however, was superior only in the two tasks most similar in complexity to the initial task. On the less similar tasks, the differences among the groups were insignificant. A generalization effect can therefore be demonstrated on outcome expectations and performance to a certain degree of task complexity. Implications of the superior performance of participants manipulated to produce medium outcome expectations are discussed.

Noam Eyal, Michael Bar-Eli, Gershon Tenenbaum, and Joan S. Pie are with the Behavioral Sciences Section of the Ribstein Center for Research and Sport Medicine Sciences, Wingate Institute, Netanya 42902, Israel.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 68 42 1
Full Text Views 2 1 1
PDF Downloads 4 2 2