Browse

Purpose: Trunk function is not only related to physical fitness performance, but also important for the balance, and stability of the whole body. This study aimed to investigate the effects of 2 training methods on trunk stability and athletic performance in adolescent female basketball players. Methods: Fifty-one healthy elite female basketball players (age: 14.76 [1.84] y, body mass index: 21.41 [1.96] kg/m²) were assigned to TRX training (n = 17), Swiss ball training (n = 17), or control groups (n = 17). Participants performed a progressive program of unstable core muscle training consisting of 8 different exercises, with each exercise performed in 3 sets, twice a week for 8 weeks. The outcome measures were a plank test, the modified double leg lowering task, and athletic performance including jumping, speed, agility, cardiopulmonary endurance, and the ankle proprioception. Results: Significant group and time interaction were identified in the modified double leg lowering task (P = .032, η ² = .134), with post hoc comparisons revealing improvements in the TRX group (P = .014). The TRX group (8.6%) improved significantly more than the Swiss ball group (2.9%) when it comes to the modified double leg lowering average change percentage. The plank test also exhibited a significant group and time interaction (P = .033, partial η ² = .133), with notable improvements in both the Swiss ball (P = .001) and the TRX groups (P = .001). Athletic performance measures showed no significant differences among groups. Conclusions: The results indicate that both TRX and Swiss ball training can increase core muscle strength and stability without compromising athletic performance after 8 weeks of training. Furthermore, incorporating core muscle training enhances power transmission capabilities. Nevertheless, considering the goal was to improve speed and ankle proprioception during preseason training, careful consideration must be given to the timing and intensity of any intervention involving unstable core muscle training.

Context: With the rise in distance running, there is an increasing interest in reducing running-related injuries and improving performance. Foot strike patterns (FSP) and step rate (SR) are key factors in managing the external forces generated during foot contact in running. Adjusting SR may help alter FSP and improve running economy (RE), yet its effects on recreational runners are not fully understood. Thus, this study aimed to examine if SR manipulations are sufficient to shift FSP and whether the manipulations change the RE. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Eighteen healthy recreational runners’ (age: 30.2 [7.6] y) foot strike angle was calculated using 2D video motion analysis, and submaximal VO₂ was measured while running on a treadmill during preferred and adjusted (±5% and ±10%) SR conditions. Foot strike angle was used to predict strike index and quantify FSP, and submaximal VO₂ was analyzed to determine RE. Results: Predicted strike index was significantly different between preferred SR and the −10% (P = .002), −5% (P = .002), and +10% (P < .001) SR conditions. Submaximal VO₂ was significantly increased in the −10% (P < .001) and −5% (P = .002) SR conditions. Conclusion: SR manipulations were sufficient to alter foot strike angle and predicted strike index in recreational runners, leading to moderate to significant changes in RE. These findings suggest that SR manipulation can be a useful tool for influencing FSPs and optimizing RE to enhance performance and reduce injury risk.

Context: Epidemiological studies have shown an increased risk of musculoskeletal injury after concussion. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the reverse relationship exists, specifically whether there is an increased risk of concussion after an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury in a population-based cohort. Design: Retrospective cohort. Methods: The Rochester Epidemiology Project was searched between 2000 and 2017 for International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revision codes relevant to the diagnosis and treatment of concussion and ACL tear. A total of 1294 unique patients with acute, isolated ACL tears and no previous history of concussion were identified. Medical records for cases were reviewed to confirm ACL tear diagnosis and to determine history of concussion after the ACL injury. Cases were matched by age, sex, and Rochester Epidemiology Project availability to patients without an ACL tear (1:3 match), resulting in 3882 controls. Medical records of matched control patients were reviewed to rule out history of ACL injury. The hazard ratio of concussion injury following an ACL injury was determined. Results: Nine patients with an ACL injury suffered concussion up to 3 years after the ACL injury. The rate of concussion was no different between ACL-injured cases (0.7%) compared with matched controls with no ACL injury (1.2%), which corresponded to a hazard ratio of 0.55 (95% confidence interval, 0.3–1.1; P = .10). Conclusions: Based on the current evidence, there does not appear to be a significant association between ACL injury and subsequent concussion, which suggests that a concussion uniquely affects the risk of future subsequent musculoskeletal injury.

Context: Concussion causes physiological disruptions, including disruptions to the vestibular and visual systems, which can cause dizziness, imbalance, and blurry vision. The vestibular ocular reflex functions to maintain a stable visual field, which can be measured using the gaze stability test (GST). Design: This preliminary study used retrospective chart review to examine changes in GST performance and asymmetry in a sample of 117 youth athletes with concussion (mean age = 14.51, SD = 2.08) before (T1) and after (T2) they completed a vestibular therapy program that included in-office treatment by a vestibular physical therapist and a customized home exercise program. Examples of exercises that may be assigned in the home exercise program during vestibular therapy are provided. Methods: After examining descriptive information, changes in GST scores and asymmetry percentage between time points were compared via Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Results were also compared descriptively with previously published findings. Results: Results revealed significant improvements in median GST in leftward and rightward direction head movements from T1 to T2 and a significant reduction in GST asymmetry (P < .001). Both GST in leftward and rightward direction head movements improved from 145.00 to 210.00°/s, which is above the 50th percentile in previously published literature with uninjured athletes. Asymmetry decreased from an average of 10.07% (SD = 7.89) to 4.11% (SD = 3.88), which is lower than in previously published literature. Conclusions: Concussion produces symptoms that vary among individuals and between injuries. GST velocity and asymmetry values provide objective data about an athlete’s impairment and progress in recovery within the vestibular domain. This can aid in making clinical decisions on return to play progression and promote a successful and safe return to sport.

Context: This case study demonstrates the effectiveness of early surgical excision of the traumatic myositis ossificans of the vastus intermedius muscle in an elite football player and return to sports activity within 3 months from the initial injury. Case presentation: A 27-year-old male professional football player presented with progressive pain and loss of range of motion after sustaining a severe, right quadriceps contusion 4 weeks earlier. After unsuccessful conservative therapy, the differential diagnosis of myositis ossificans was suspected and confirmed on radiographic examination. MRI revealed significant edema encompassing a substantial portion of the vastus intermedius muscle. Management and outcomes: Surgical treatment was considered for the right thigh mass, being symptomatic 1 month after the onset and refractory to conservative treatment and rehabilitation program. At 2 months postsurgery, the patient was asymptomatic and had completed a rehabilitation program. Conclusion: Early surgical treatment followed-up with a rehabilitation program results with a complete recovery of muscle strength and range of motion. At 3 months postinitial injury, the patient was considered fully recovered and had returned to the match without reporting pain or other symptoms.

Context: In line with emerging research, an interprofessional specialty concussion clinic instituted a policy change permitting earlier physiotherapy-based treatment entry. Our objective was to determine the effect of this policy change on concussion recovery outcomes. Design: Secondary analysis of prospectively collected clinical data. Methods: 600 youth with concussion were included. Active rehabilitation was initiated ≥4 weeks (prepolicy) or ≥2 weeks (postpolicy) postconcussion based on institutional policy. Cox proportional hazard models, linear mixed models, and chi-square analyses were conducted. Results: The postpolicy group (median = 22 d [interquartile range: 17–27]) started treatment earlier than the prepolicy group (median = 26 d [interquartile range: 24–30], P < .001). Length of episode of care (χ ²(1) = 11.55, P < .001, odds ratios = 1.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.19–1.88); rehabilitation (χ ²(1) = 9.47, P = .002, odds ratios = 1.73, 95% confidence interval, 1.22–2.45]); and total recovery (χ ²(1) = 11.53, P < .001, odds ratios = 1.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.18–1.88) were reduced in patients postpolicy change. A significant interaction effect was found for total postinjury symptom (F _2,320 = 3.59, P = .03) and symptom change scores (F _2,315 = 5.17, P = .006), with the postpolicy group having faster symptom resolution over time. No group differences were observed for persisting symptoms. Conclusions: Earlier rehabilitation initiation occurred as intended following an institutional policy change, which had small, but significant, effects on recovery outcomes in youth with concussion. Health care providers should adopt policies to encourage early active rehabilitation services after concussion.

Context: Athletes with a history of concussion (CON) have been demonstrated to have heightened levels of anxiety and depression that may continue well beyond the resolution of concussion symptoms. The global events of 2020 resulted in elevated levels of anxiety and depression in the general population, which may have unequally presented in collegiate athletes with (CON) than those without a history of concussion (NoCON). Using a deception design, our survey-based study compared levels of anxiety and depression in CON and NoCON collegiate athletes in response to the pandemic and social injustices. We hypothesized that the CON group would have significantly elevated anxiety and depression as compared to the NoCON group in response to events of 2020. Design and Methods: Collegiate athletes (N = 106) during the academic 2020–2021 academic year were divided into CON and NoCON groups based on their preinjury (baseline) concussion assessment. Participants completed the Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SSRS), Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 (GAD-7) via an electronic survey pertaining to the events of 2020. The term “concussion” was not used in any study materials which was the basis for our deception-based design. An analysis of covariance was used to compare group CES-D and GAD-7 outcome scores while controlling for the SSRS outcome score. Results: Our survey response rate was 14.2% (48/337 [77.1% female]) and 10.1% (58/580 [67.2% female]), for the NoCON and CON groups, respectively. The NoCON group had significantly (F ₁ = 5.82, P = .018, ${\eta }_{\mathrm{p}}^2=.06$ ) higher anxiety (8.3 [5.89]) as compared to the CON group (5.5 [2.85]). The NoCON group also had significantly (F ₁ = 13.7, P < .001, ${\eta }_{\mathrm{p}}^2=.12$ ) higher levels of depression (21.0 [12.52]) as compared to the CON group (16.07 [9.10]). Discussion: Our deception-based study revealed NoCON participants had elevated and clinically relevant mood states as compared to CON participants in response to the events of 2020.

Although concussion management and return to play/learn decision making focuses on reducing symptoms, there is growing interest in objective physiological approaches to treatment. Clinical and technological advancements have aided concussion management; however, the scientific study of the neurophysiology of concussion has not translated into its standard of care. This expert commentary is motivated by novel clinical applications of electroencephalographic-based neurofeedback approaches (eg, quantitative electroencephalography [QEEG]) for treating traumatic brain injury and emerging research interest in its translation for treating concussion. QEEG’s low-cost relative to other brain recording/imaging techniques and precedent in clinical and medical care makes it a potential tool for concussion rehabilitation. Although uncommon, licensed and certified clinicians and medical professionals are implementing QEEG neurofeedback for concussion management within their score of practice. These approaches are not widely adopted nor recommended by professional medical societies, likely because of a limited evidence base of well-designed studies with available standard protocols. Thus, the potential efficacy of QEEG neurofeedback for treating persistent symptoms or cognitive dysfunction after sports-related concussion is unknown. This commentary will update the concussion clinician–scientist on the emerging research, techniques, and disagreements pertaining to the translation of QEEG neurofeedback for concussion management, particularly in the treatment of persistent cognitive difficulties. This commentary will also introduce to readers the fundamentals of how the electroencephalogram may be acquired, measured, and implemented during QEEG neurofeedback. An evidence base of supportive findings from well-designed studies, including those that are retrospective, outcomes-based, and, ultimately, placebo/sham-controlled is recommended prior to considering more widespread adoption of QEEG neurofeedback approaches for treating persistent symptoms or cognitive deficits after sports-related concussion. We review the considerable barriers to this research and clinical implementation, and conclude with opportunities for future research, which will be necessary for establishing the quality and efficacy of QEEG neurofeedback for concussion care.

Context: Targeted and directed rehabilitation with a healthcare provider can be an effective approach in the treatment of concussion, particularly for patients with protracted recovery, high symptom reporting, cervicogenic dysfunction, musculoskeletal involvement, and/or vestibular/oculomotor dysfunction. While many environmental and intrinsic medical history factors may influence concussion recovery, little is known about whether an individual’s recovery trajectory can be influenced by the amount of time taken to receive rehabilitation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate recovery trajectories of concussion patients requiring targeted multimodal rehabilitation after a specialty concussion clinic visit within ≤3 days, 4 to 7 days, and >7 days. We also sought to evaluate risk factors for protracted recovery. Design and Methods: The study involved a retrospective chart review of 103 patients (mean age = 13.78 [2.89]; 55% female) who, after their initial specialty concussion clinic visit, received rehabilitation in ≤3 days, 4 to 7 days, and >7 days. Patients were evaluated at a pediatric specialty concussion clinic between April 2021 and December 2023, and diagnosed with concussion by a specialist (primary care sports medicine physician, nurse practitioner, and/or neuropsychologist), referred for rehabilitation via physical therapy services, completed more than one rehabilitation session, and received medical clearance to initiate the return-to-sport protocol. Groups were compared based on relevant clinical factors, Vestibular Ocular Motor Screening, neurocognitive testing (Trails B-A), Post-Concussion Symptom Scale, days from injury to concussion evaluation, days from concussion evaluation to rehabilitation, number of rehabilitation sessions, recovery days after rehabilitation, and total recovery days (ie, days from injury to medical clearance to initiate return-to-sport protocol). Data analysis included chi-square, correlations, 1-way analysis of variance, and general linear regression. Adjusted odds ratios for protracted recovery were derived from a logistic regression model. Discussion: Days from injury to concussion evaluation (P < .001), days from concussion evaluation to rehabilitation (P = .006), and Trails B-A (P = .009), were significant predictors of total recovery time among pediatric concussion patients who required multimodal rehabilitation. Risk of protracted recovery increased by 34% each day from injury to concussion evaluation a patient did not receive treatment (Nagelkerke Pseudo R ² = .45; P < .001). Previous studies have also shown that time to concussion evaluation is an important prognostic indicator of recovery. Correspondingly, prompt referral to concussion care and rehabilitation for patients with a need for multimodal rehabilitation can improve recovery outcomes.