Search Results

You are looking at 11 - 20 of 20 items for :

  • Refine by Access: All Content x
Clear All
Open access

D. Enette Larson-Meyer, Kathleen Woolf, and Louise Burke

than UWW for some groups of athletes e • Subject to above errors of densitometry • BODPOD must be kept in separate room with closely-regulated temperature and humidity • Athlete must wear swimwear and swim cap • Moisture on skin, body hair, clothing worn, f and type of swim cap g can induce large

Full access

Ava Farley, Gary J. Slater, and Karen Hind

POD R 2  = .99–.99, DXA R 2  = 1.00–0.99) and FFM (BOD POD R 2  = .99–.99, DXA R 2  = .99–.99). In support, previous research using DXA and BODPOD technology shows consistent results with this study, with only small or trivial PE in FM and FFM estimates from consecutive-day testing conducted under

Restricted access

Thomas Reeve, Ralph Gordon, Paul B. Laursen, Jason K.W. Lee, and Christopher J. Tyler

, Hamburg, Germany) and stature (Harpenden Stadiometer; Holtain Ltd, Crosswell, UK) were recorded before percentage fat was measured using the whole-body air displacement plethysmography method (BodPod; Cosmed, Rome, Italy). Anthropometric data were collected by an International Society for the Advancement

Restricted access

Kim Beals, Katherine A. Perlsweig, John E. Haubenstriker, Mita Lovalekar, Chris P. Beck, Darcie L. Yount, Matthew E. Darnell, Katelyn Allison, and Bradley C. Nindl

BodPod body composition system (COSMED USA Inc., Chicago, IL) following the standardized manufacturers procedures. Intrasubject reliability within our laboratory has demonstrated reliability and validity (ICC = .98 and SEM  = 0.47% BF). Aerobic capacity and lactate threshold were calculated from an

Restricted access

Ricardo S. Oliveira, Alan R. Barker, Sascha H. Kranen, Florian Debras, and Craig A. Williams

), displayed signs of subjective fatigue, and an unwillingness to continue the test despite strong verbal encouragement. For descriptive purposes, body fat percentage was determined using air displacement plethysmography (BodPod ® , Concord, CA) and participants received a package containing adapted drawings

Restricted access

Gregory Severino, Marcos Sanchez-Gonzalez, Michelle Walters-Edwards, Michael Nordvall, Oksana Chernykh, Jason Adames, and Alexei Wong

, using a weighing scale (Life Measurement, Inc., Concord, CA) and a stadiometer. BMI was calculated as weight in kg/height in m 2 . Percent body fat (BF%), fat mass (FM, kg), and lean body mass (LBM, kg) were determined using the BodPod whole-body air-displacement plethysmography method (Life Measurement

Restricted access

Xiang Yao, Christopher Curtis, Anthony Turner, Chris Bishop, Alex Austerberry, and Shyam Chavda

greater body fat percentage and higher fat mass compared with South African (30.81% [4.56%]) 6 and Scottish female RU squads (23.2 [4.9] kg). 7 However, when making comparisons, caution should be applied given that previous research 6 , 7 used different testing methods (BodPod and skinfolds). Although

Restricted access

Keren Susan Cherian, Ashok Sainoji, Balakrishna Nagalla, and Venkata Ramana Yagnambhatt

determined using skinfold technique was validated against body plethysmography  (densitometry technique as reference) using BODPOD  (Life Measurement, Inc, Concord, CA) in the age group of 10- to 18-year-old Indian adolescents, with an accuracy of 2.9% (±5.68%) and 0.53% (±4.77%) in boys and girls

Restricted access

Flavio A. Cadegiani, Pedro Henrique L. Silva, Tatiana C.P. Abrao, and Claudio E. Kater

plethismography (BodPod, CosMed, Concord, CA) for body weight and body fat (in percentage), and measured electrical bioimpedance (InBody770; BIOSPACE CO., Ltd, Seoul, South Korea) for muscle mass (in kilogram and in percentage), body water (in percentage of total body weight), and visceral fat (in centimeter

Full access

Ida A. Heikura, Arja L.T. Uusitalo, Trent Stellingwerff, Dan Bergland, Antti A. Mero, and Louise M. Burke

-ray absorptiometry or air displacement plethysmography (BodPod) provided “best practice” conditions for body composition analysis are utilized. Alternatively, well-standardized skinfold measures or bioelectrical impedance analysis may be used. Interpretation of EA values The following cutoffs have been established