Search Results

You are looking at 21 - 24 of 24 items for :

  • "Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency" x
  • Physical Education and Coaching x
  • Refine by Access: All Content x
Clear All
Restricted access

Layne Case and Joonkoo Yun

, prompting, pivotal response training, reinforcement, task analysis, tech-aided instruction, and visual supports. The outcome measures included the TGMD, Peabody Developmental Motor Scales, Movement Assessment Battery for Children, Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, and their subsequent editions

Restricted access

Janet L. Hauck, Isabella T. Felzer-Kim, and Kathryn L. Gwizdala

they age, following the similar trend in TD individuals ( Esposito, MacDonald, Hornyak, & Ulrich, 2012 ). In TD children, many studies have investigated the relationship between PA and motor development. In TD children aged 8–10 years, motor proficiency measured on the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor

Restricted access

Andrew M. Colombo-Dougovito and Jihyun Lee

Skills Improvement System; SP-CQ = Sensory Profile-Caregiver Questionnaire; ABC = Aberrant Behavior Checklist-community; BOTMP-2 = Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency; SIPT = Sensory Integration and Praxis Test; BASC-T = Behavior Assessment System for Children; CPRT = classroom pivotal response

Full access

Kelly P. Arbour-Nicitopoulos, Viviane Grassmann, Krystn Orr, Amy C. McPherson, Guy E. Faulkner, and F. Virginia Wright

/A Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (BOT-2); Pediatric Balance Scale; and parent and instructor observation (+) peer interactions; parental assistance; and balance and motor skills Carter et al. ( 2014 ) United Kingdom Focus groups; individual interviews; observation 33.3% 25 children (actively