behavior or drug possession versus other-harming crimes like assault, domestic violence, and drunk driving; and misconduct by star players versus less prominent players. We also investigated the role played by media coverage of off-field misconduct, a potentially important mechanism through which off
Qi Ge and Brad R. Humphreys
Jason Daniels, Thilo Kunkel, and Adam Karg
its consumption. Recent findings indicated that the brand associations of new sport teams that were ranked highest by fans are related to the personnel of the team, such as the star players, management, and head coach ( Kunkel et al., 2016 ). Consequently, it appears that consumers develop attribute
Kyle R. King
Grand Slams provide the stages on which star players shine the brightest. Because of the individuality of tennis, and because of how tennis style seems to embody an individual’s personality, tennis fandom is not determined by geography in the same way it might be for fans choosing to support the local
James M. Gladden and Daniel C. Funk
This study broadens the understanding of brand management in sport by creating the Team Association Model, a scale that identifies dimensions of brand associations, a major contributor to the creation of brand equity. Utilizing Keller’s (1993) theoretical framework of consumer-based brand equity, a thorough review of the sport literature was conducted which identified 16 potential dimensions. These 16 dimensions are derived with reference to Keller’s categorization of brand associations into ATTRIBUTE (success, head coach, star player, management, stadium, logo design, product delivery, and tradition), BENEFIT (identification, nostalgia, pride in place, escape, and peer group acceptance), and ATTITUDE (importance, knowledge, and affect). In order to evaluate the applicability of each potential dimension, a scale is developed, pre-tested, and tested on a national sample of sport consumers. Results of the confirmatory factor analysis of provided support for this paper’s theoretical notion that 16 distinct constructs underlie brand associations in sports.
Joel Maxcy and Michael Mondello
Free agency was reintroduced to professional team sport leagues in the 1970s. Sport enthusiasts expressed concern that competitive balance would diminish as star players congregated to large market cities. However, the economic invariance principle rejects this notion, indicating that balance should remain unchanged. This article empirically examines the effects of changes in free agent rules on competitive balance over time in the National Basketball Association (NBA), National Football League (NFL), and National Hockey League (NHL). Regression analysis using within-season and between-season measures of competitive balance as dependent variables provides mixed results. The NFL and NHL provide evidence that an aspect of competitive balance has improved, but results from the NBA indicate that balance has worsened since the introduction of free agency. We conclude that the ambiguous results suggest that the effects are not independent, but instead depend on the interaction of free agent rights with other labor market and league rules.
Daniel C. Funk and Jeffrey D. James
Prior research has demonstrated a direct relationship between loyalty and reasons for liking a particular sport team. The current study replicates and extends this line of inquiry by examining the mediating role of attachment, a process by which an individual moves from merely liking a team (attraction) to becoming loyal to a team (allegiance). Data (Collegiate N = 194; Collegiate and Professional N = 402, Favorite Sport Team N = 808) were collected to examine 13 benefits and attributes associated with liking a sport team, 3 attitude formation properties, and allegiance. A three-stage test of mediation using MLR revealed that attachment mediated the relationship between allegiance and Vicarious Achievement, Nostalgia, Star Player, Escape, Success, and Peer Group Acceptance. Results demonstrate that allegiance is the outcome of a process by which individuals develop stronger emotional reactions to, more functional knowledge about, and greater symbolic value for benefits and attributes associated with a sport team.
Shih-Hao Wu, Ching-Yi Daphne Tsai, and Chung-Chieh Hung
This study extends literature on the effects of fan identification on fan loyalty, and antecedents that trigger such effects. This study incorporates trust, a key relationship marketing construct, in the sport industry. The relationship between trust and two other critical antecedents of sport fan loyalty, identification and vicarious achievement motive, is examined from the perspectives of both fan-player and fan-team. The results show that antecedents from distinct perspectives influence loyalty differently. Team identification (fan-team level) is the major determinant of fans’ repatronage intention, with trust in the team as the key driver. However, player identification (fan-player level) has an indirect effect, which must go through team identification to repatronage intention. Therefore, sport organizations are recommended to invest a substantial part of their resources on activities that generate long-term effects, such as trust in the team and team identification, rather than on short-term strategies such as attracting star players.
Line D. Danielsen, Rune Giske, Derek M. Peters, and Rune Høigaard
) and subsequently team performance. Cope, Eys, Beauchamp, Schinke, and Bosselut ( 2011 ) identified 12 specific informal roles that seem to exist in sport (e.g., comedian, star player, cancer, and distractor) and how each role influences the team. The categorization of both formal and informal roles
Cassidy Preston and Jessica Fraser-Thomas
larger aims: I need to know my players and put the right players on at the right times. For example, a player who has played a strong game and has done the little things well should be put on at the end of the game or in a key situation. Likewise, I need to sit a star player for not doing the little
Andy Gillham and Craig Stone
from an abundance of caution in that 8 of the 16 participants have been “starters” for at least 2 years in the NFL, with one being a 6-year starter, six participants having played in a Super Bowl, two participants having been All-Star players, and one player having earned the highest accolade by being