Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 10 of 14 items for :

  • "case study" x
  • Athletic Training, Therapy, and Rehabilitation x
  • User-accessible content x
Clear All
Open access

Jennifer M. Medina McKeon, Patrick O. McKeon and Marjorie A. King

Open access

Victoria Fauntroy, Marcie Fyock, Jena Hansen-Honeycutt, Esther Nolton and Jatin P. Ambegaonkar

inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in this critically appraised topic (CAT) (Table  1 ). • Three of the included studies provided clinical case studies using the SFMA with appropriate treatment interventions to improve the patient’s dysfunctions. 5 , 6 , 10 • One included study examined the

Open access

Jeffrey B. Driban and R. Mark Laursen

Researcher Share your experience and wisdom (e.g., publish CASE studies) Write manuscripts that are accessible to clinicians and include take-home messages about the clinical implications of the findings Attend free-communication sessions and ask questions or offer perspective Share peer-reviewed results

Full access

Ian McGinnis, Justin Cobb, Ryan Tierney and Anne Russ

checklist for cohort studies 1 , 10 and the Center for Evidence Based Management (CEBM) critical appraisal of a case study 9 forms. For each selected study, two researchers independently scored the forms and the averages were used for strength of recommendation. Results of Search Summary of Search

Open access

Christie Powell, Jody Jensen and Samantha Johnson

lateral hop 12″ × 20 s (LSI = 90%) Case study Level 4 N = 1 Racouillat 38 16 y/female Patellar dislocation (1) SLHD (2) VJ (3) Sprint test (LSI calculated) Case study Level 4 N = 1 Greenberg et al 39 8–15 y mean age: 12.28 y male/female ACLR (1) SLHD (2) SLTHD (3) SLVJ (4) SL lateral hop 12″ × 20 s (LSI

Full access

Mindi Fisher, Ryan Tierney, Anne Russ and Jamie Mansell

• Retrospective, cross-sectional studies • Full-text and in English Exclusion Criteria • Studies that used methods other than graded symptom checklist (GSC), standardized assessment of concussion (SAC), or neurocognitive testing (ImPACT specifically) • Studies published outside of 2007 through the present • Case

Open access

Jennifer M. Medina McKeon and Patrick O. McKeon

and therefore are ranked higher than case studies. In general, research studies that are higher on the hierarchy of clinical evidence have a better SOR grade. 3. The nature of the outcomes of interest: In regard to the SOR, the key delineation for the nature of the outcomes of interest tend to be

Open access

Lauren Anne Lipker, Caitlyn Rae Persinger, Bradley Steven Michalko and Christopher J. Durall

–2018 publication dates Exclusion Criteria • Case studies • Studies involving participants who had other pathologies of the knee in addition to ACLR Results of Search An extensive search of the literature yielded many articles; however, only 3 studies met the eligibility requirements and were considered for review

Open access

Mary Lynn Manduca and Stephen J. Straub

compared to rehabilitative therapy alone. However, some low-level evidence case studies and case series of varying sizes and participant demographics, as well as a randomized comparison study involving general muscle injury, and a retrospective review involving proximal hamstring injury, have all shown

Full access

Matthew Booth, Jacob Powell, Patrick O. McKeon and Jennifer M. Medina McKeon

(c) were case studies were excluded. Evidence Quality Assessment Evidence Appraisal Two different critical appraisal tools were used to identify potential threats to validity, depending on study design. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale (for clinical trials) and the Joanna Briggs