Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 8 of 8 items for

  • Author: Alan M. Nasypany x
Clear All Modify Search
Restricted access

Jena A. Hansen-Honeycutt, Alan M. Nasypany and Russell T. Baker

Two physically active patients presented with low back pain (LBP) and were previously diagnosed with a herniated disc. A unique treatment combination of a muscle energy technique (MET) and MyoKinesthetic (MYK) treatments were used to decrease pain and improve function. The treatment combination displayed clinically significant short-term improvements in four treatments or less and both patients reported no recurrence of pain at their 1-year follow-up. It is questionable if the presence of an anatomical abnormality, such as a herniated disc, is truly the source or unrelated to those experiencing LBP; utilizing a MET and MYK treatment may be beneficial for other patients reporting similar symptoms.

Restricted access

James M. May, Alan Nasypany, Julie Paolino, Russell Baker and Jeffrey Seegmiller

Context:

While the incidence and reinjury rates of lateral ankle sprain (LAS) continue to persist at high rates across many sporting activities, further exploration of assessment and treatment beyond the traditional ligamentous and strength/proprioceptive model is warranted. Further, assessing and treating both arthrokinematic and osteokinematic changes associated with LAS can provide insight into a more diverse approach to treating ankle pathology.

Objective:

To examine the clinical use of the Mulligan Concept mobilization with movement (MWM) while treating patients diagnosed with an acute grade I or II LAS through authentic patient care.

Design:

An a priori case series.

Setting:

Intercollegiate athletic training clinic.

Patients:

Intercollegiate patients diagnosed with an acute grade I or II LAS.

Intervention:

The Mulligan Concept distal fibular anterior to posterior MWM.

Main Outcome Measures:

Pain-Intensity Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) with Non-Weight Bearing (NRS-NWB) and Weight Bearing (NRS-WB), Disablement of the Physically Active Scale (DPAscale), Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) with Activity of Daily living (FAMM-ADL) and Sport (FAAM-Sport), Client Specific Impairment Measure (CSIM), Y-Balance Composite (YBC), and Weight Bearing Measure for Dorsiflexion (WBDF).

Results:

Patients who are diagnosed with an acute grade I or II LAS and are treated with the Mulligan Concept report immediate and long-lasting minimal clinically important differences in patient outcome measures.

Conclusion:

Clinicians who examine and use the Mulligan Concept MWM to treat acute LAS can expect immediate positive results that are progressively retained over time specific to patient-centered outcome measures as well as functional clinicianbased measures. Based on the immediate and positive results, clinicians should examine associated osteokinematic and arthrokinematic changes beyond that of the traditional ligamentous model.

Restricted access

Marcie B. Fyock, Jeffrey G. Seegmiller, Alan M. Nasypany and Russell T. Baker

Restricted access

Monica A. Matocha, Russell T. Baker, Alan M. Nasypany and Jeff G. Seegmiller

Restricted access

Monica A. Matocha, Russell T. Baker, Alan M. Nasypany and Jeff G. Seegmiller

Restricted access

Alex J. Rhinehart, Kevin M. Schroeder, James May, Russell Baker and Alan Nasypany

Restricted access

Russell T. Baker, Mark Van Riper, Alan M. Nasypany and Jeff G. Seegmiller

Restricted access

Christy Hancock, Bethany Hansberger, Rick Loutsch, Eric Stanford, Ali Zeigel, Robert Bonser, Russell Baker, Scott Cheatham, James May and Alan M. Nasypany