Search Results

You are looking at 161 - 170 of 212 items for :

  • "strength testing" x
Clear All
Restricted access

Mehrez Hammami, Nawel Gaamouri, Gaith Aloui, Roy J. Shephard and Mohamed Souhaiel Chelly

-of-direction ability, s  T-half test 7.21 (0.21) 6.84 (0.21) 7.20 (0.34) 7.16 (0.35) .042 0.09  Modified Illinois test 13.50 (0.41) 12.93 (0.41) 13.56 (0.35) 13.49 (0.34) .026 0.10 Abbreviations: ANOVA, analysis of variance; ES, effect size. Table 2 Comparisons of Vertical-Jump, Horizontal-Jump, and Strength-Test

Open access

Anna Lina Rahlf, Klaus-Michael Braumann and Astrid Zech

placed on the lateral epicondyle of the femur. Knee-flexion ROM was defined as the maximum deviation from the neutral zero position. 37 Subjects performed the active knee flexion independently. All tests were conducted in a fixed order with strength test at last to avoid exhaustion while testing

Restricted access

Lisa M. Barnett, David R. Lubans, Anna Timperio, Jo Salmon and Nicola D. Ridgers

using the standing long jump (lower body) and handgrip strength test (upper body). For the standing long jump, children stood with both feet parallel behind a marked line and were asked to jump with both feet simultaneously as far as possible ( Eather, Morgan, & Lubans, 2011 ). Whilst this test is

Full access

Michael Wälchli, Jan Ruffieux,, Audrey Mouthon, Martin Keller and Wolfgang Taube

. COP indicates center of pressure; INT, intervention; CON, control. * P  = .012. Figure 2 —RTD for explosive strength test in an isometric right-leg plantar flexion (interaction: P  = .040; η p 2 = .06 ; INT: r  = .33). Black dots and lines represent all INT groups and gray dots and lines represent

Restricted access

Emily Arentson-Lantz, Elfego Galvan, Adam Wacher, Christopher S. Fry and Douglas Paddon-Jones

., Shirley, NY) on Days 2 and 12. Peak aerobic capacity (VO 2 peak) (Monark Ergomedic 828E; Monark Exercise, Vansbro, Sweden) was assessed using graded cycle ergometry (Vmax Encore 29; CareFusion, Yorba Linda, CA) approximately 2 hr following strength testing on study Days 2 and 12. A standard 75-g oral

Restricted access

Robert MacKenzie, Linda Monaghan, Robert A. Masson, Alice K. Werner, Tansinee S. Caprez, Lynsey Johnston and Ole J. Kemi

. 25. Torpel A , Becker T , Thiers A , Hamacher D , Schega L . Intersession reliability of isokinetic strength testing in knee and elbow extension and flexion using the BTE PrimusRS . J Sport Rehabil . 2017 ; 26 ( 4 ): 1 – 14 .doi:10.1123/jsr.2016-0209 10.1123/jsr.2016-0209 26. Devlin

Restricted access

Samuel T. Orange, James W. Metcalfe, Ashley Robinson, Mark J. Applegarth and Andreas Liefeith

. J Strength Cond Res . 2004 ; 18 ( 2 ): 316 – 323 . PubMed ID: 15142000 15142000 8. Dankel SJ , Counts BR , Barnett BE , Buckner SL , Abe T , Loenneke JP . Muscle adaptations following 21 consecutive days of strength test familiarization compared with traditional training . Muscle

Restricted access

Rodney Y. L. Wong, Patrick S. H. Yung and H. T. Leong

elbow flexion, 14 , 16 to approximate the upper-limb position in an overhead throwing motion during softball passing. The range of motion was limited to 90° ER and 0° IR as proposed being comfortable to and not injuring the participants. 13 , 14 Isokinetic strength test was performed concentrically at

Restricted access

Amador García-Ramos, Guy Gregory Haff, Francisco Luis Pestaña-Melero, Alejandro Pérez-Castilla, Francisco Javier Rojas, Carlos Balsalobre-Fernández and Slobodan Jaric

c5f 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b62c5f 19966589 10. Brzycki M . Strength testing—predicting a one-rep max from reps-to-fatigue . J Phys Educ Recreat Dance . 1993 ; 64 : 88 – 90 . doi:10.1080/07303084.1993.10606684 10.1080/07303084.1993.10606684 11. Reynolds JM , Gordon TJ , Robergs RA

Restricted access

Thales M. Medeiros, João B. Ribeiro-Alvares, Carolina G. Fritsch, Gabriel S. Oliveira, Lucas Severo-Silveira, Evangelos Pappas and Bruno M. Baroni

systematic review and meta-analysis . Br J Sports Med . 2015 ; 49 ( 6 ): 349 – 356 . PubMed ID: 25227125 doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-093466 25227125 39. Van Dyk N , Bahr R , Burnett AF , et al . A comprehensive strength testing protocol offers no clinical value in predicting risk of hamstring