Search Results

You are looking at 31 - 40 of 56 items for :

  • "balance error scoring system" x
Clear All
Restricted access

Lendewig * Barry D. Wilson * Wee Kian Yeo * Ramlan Abdul Aziz * Dietmar Schmidtbleicher * 5 2016 25 2 126 132 10.1123/jsr.2014-0280 Comparing Computer-Derived and Human-Observed Scores for the Balance Error Scoring System Jaclyn B. Caccese * Thomas W. Kaminski * 5 2016 25 2 133 136 10.1123/jsr

Restricted access

L. McNitt-Gray * 35 1 25 31 10.1123/jab.2017-0163 jab.2017-0163 Validity of an Automated Balance Error Scoring System Stephen M. Glass * Alessandro Napoli * Elizabeth D. Thompson * Iyad Obeid * Carole A. Tucker * 35 1 32 36 10.1123/jab.2018-0056 jab.2018-0056 Two Novel Slip Training

Open access

Thomas M. Newman, Giampietro L. Vairo and William E. Buckley

directions:  (1) Anterior  (2) Anterior–medial  (3) Medial  (4) Posterior–medial  (5) Posterior  (6) Posterior–lateral  (7) Lateral  (8) Anterior–lateral 3 performance measures:  (1) Vertical jump (Vertec)  (2) Balance Error Scoring System (BESS)  (3) Agility run using the southeast Missouri (SEMO

Restricted access

Abbis H. Jaffri, Thomas M. Newman, Brent I. Smith, Giampietro L. Vairo, Craig R. Denegar, William E. Buckley and Sayers J. Miller

, such as quiet standing on force plates in laboratory settings, or using the Balance Error Scoring System in clinical settings. 8 – 10 However, because of the difference in task constraints involved in static and dynamic balance activities, static balance tests may not provide relevant information

Restricted access

David R. Howell, Thomas A. Buckley, Brant Berkstresser, Francis Wang and William P. Meehan III

Error Scoring System or modified Balance Error Scoring System, none reported using measures of gait. 3 Balance and gait are not interchangeable terms 4 and thus should be assessed separately. The utility of gait assessments in postconcussion evaluations have recently been described in a series of

Open access

Matt Hausmann, Jacob Ober and Adam S. Lepley

their assessment through goniometry and also assessed balance through the balance error scoring system. 2 This study found that patient plantarflexion and dorsiflexion ROM significantly improved equally for both groups over a 5-day span. Friesen 4 also concluded that the average balance error scoring

Restricted access

Danielle M. Dobney, Scott G. Thomas, Tim Taha and Michelle Keightley

correlation coefficient for the total SCAT-2 score is fair for young adults (.367). 26 The Balance Error Scoring System was conducted on a firm surface only assessing the total number of errors. Data Collection Following recruitment and consent, participants were tested by trained study personnel in a quiet

Restricted access

Douglas A. Pizac, Charles B. Swanik, Joseph J. Glutting and Thomas W. Kaminski

total BESS score was the sum of these 3 stances. Figure 3 —Modified balance error scoring system stances: double-leg firm (A), single-leg firm (B), and tandem firm (C). Statistical Analyses The independent variables in this study were treatment (Highlight cleat vs. low/mid-cut cleat with ankle tape) and

Restricted access

Robert Vallandingham, Zachary Winkelmann, Lindsey Eberman and Kenneth Games

.2  Flexibility 30 28.0  Strength 59 55.1  Balance and NMC 43 40.2  Passive joint mobilizations 15 14.0  Functional/sport-specific exercise 34 31.8  Not reported 40 37.4 Functional assessments  Star Excursion Balance Test 0 0.0  Balance Error Scoring System 0 0.0  Single-leg hop test 0 0.0  Not reported 103 96

Full access

Mindi Fisher, Ryan Tierney, Anne Russ and Jamie Mansell

time, and impulse control) and protocol validity. Completion of Child-SCAT3 to assess symptom rating, physical assessment, cognitive demographics, and health history. Next SAC-C to assess orientation, immediate memory, concentration, and delayed recall. Lastly, completion of the Balance Error Scoring