This study examines the discourse associated with the membership policies at Shoal Creek and Augusta National Golf Clubs. Get-away havens for wealthy White males, these clubs became contested terrains when each was scheduled to host a major golf event: the 1990 PGA Championship at Shoal Creek and the 2003 Masters Tournament at Augusta National. At the time of the events in this study, Shoal Creek had a Whites-only membership policy and Augusta National a male-only policy, which it maintains today. Controversy ensued when the chairs of each club made disparaging comments to the press about these excluded groups. Two parallel areas were considered in our comparative analysis: how the commercial sponsors responded to the controversies, and how the club chairs and their supporters used the rhetorical strategy of apologia to defend themselves and restore the public image of golf. Our analysis reveals the differences in how the cultural constructs of race and gender were negotiated in each case.
Gina Daddario and Brian J. Wigley
Rob Millington, Simon C. Darnell and Brad Millington
goals ( Brooks, 2015 ). The post-political nature of ecological modernization is also apparent in the golf event itself, where the contested politics of building a course have been replaced by a consensual politics of how (rather than if, or why) the course will be built. The point is further
history of golf’s niche sport tourism segment (Chapter 6); golf tournaments, special golf events (Ryder Cup, Solheim Cup, and Olympics), and golf event spectators (Chapter 7); growth and development in golf media, sponsorship, and retail (Chapters 8–10); the need innovations within the golf industry