The specific information provided in this paper offers a descriptive history regarding the attempts of Southern Methodist University (SMU) to be “modern” through tracing the institution’s movement from one playing field to another. Like other southern universities, SMU started football and built an on-campus stadium of concrete and steel believing their legitimacy as an institution could be enhanced through providing football as a product for consumption. However, SMU is unique among many of its contemporaries because soon after building an on-campus facility, it decided to move off campus in the pursuit of greater name recognition and revenue. Collectively, such efforts were recognized as helping to make SMU the “educational surprise of the decade, if not the century,” following its opening in 1915. The modernization of SMU football stadia involves construction and renovation of facilities from Armstrong Field (1915) to Gerald J. Ford Stadium (current).
Chad Stephen Seifried and Patrick Tutka
Daniel S. Mason, Marvin Washington, and Ernest A.N. Buist
Status and reputation have become increasingly important to cities seeking to differentiate themselves in a competitive global marketplace; sports events, franchises, and infrastructure have become a critical means to contest this. This article takes a grounded theory approach and develops a series of propositions on the basis of a single case study, making several important contributions to the literature. Although others have argued for an affiliation effect, this study sheds new light on how the affiliation mechanism works by including both positive and negative affiliations. In doing so, we reveal how cities are actively managed, how sports facilities emerge as status signals on the policy agenda of entrepreneurial cities, and how notions of status are articulated and mobilized by managers.
Glynn M. McGehee, Armin A. Marquez, Beth A. Cianfrone, and Timothy Kellison
Stadium-construction projects are costly and affect the community—positively and negatively. At urban universities, these impacts extend beyond campuses into the broader community. Thus, athletic-department communication about the value of stadium projects to a diverse group of stakeholders becomes important. Following stakeholder theory, the purpose of the study was to investigate social-media messages disseminated by an urban university engaged in a stadium-redevelopment project (Georgia State University [GSU]) and the public response. A content analysis of Facebook and Twitter posts by GSU (N = 39) and the public response (N = 359) yielded 8 themes: a focus on athletics, a focus on university, informing about urban community development impact, explaining capital project funding source, maintaining the stadium legacy, promoting public–private partnerships, and understanding effects on transit. Findings support previous literature that organizational communication reflects organizational priorities.
Collection, Folder “Athletic Department-General Correspondence,” University of Mississippi; “President’s Box,” November 30, 1939, Folder “Athletics-Stadium Construction and Dedication, 1937–1946,” Presidential Records of Luther N. Duncan, Auburn University Department of Archives and Manuscripts, Auburn, AL
like Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka—have died in Qatar since 2010, with around three dozen perishing while working directly on World Cup stadium construction ( Pattisson et al., 2021 ). Moreover, according to Human Rights Watch ( 2022b ), hundreds of thousands of migrant workers
Brian P. Soebbing, Chad S. Seifried, and Patrick Tutka
eras of professional stadium construction ( Clapp & Hakes, 2005 ). Additional scholarship examined differences in the novelty effect between amateur/minor and major professional stadiums ( Gitter & Rhoads, 2014 ; Popp et al., 2018 ; Soebbing et al., 2016 ). For example, Gitter and Rhoads found that
Alexander L. Curry and Tiara Good
in-stadium recollections, old ticket stubs from random games, favorite jerseys, etc.); speculation about what a return to baseball—if there would be a return at all—would look like; and there were practical concerns (e.g., ticket refunds, stadium construction, Tommy John surgeries, etc.). These
Scott Tainsky, Brian M. Mills, Zainab Hans, and Kyunghee Lee
.A. ( 2013 ). Stadium construction and minor league baseball attendance . Contemporary Economic Policy, 32 ( 1 ), 144 – 154 . doi:10.1111/coep.2014.32.issue-1 10.1111/coep.12016 Goff , B. , Wilson , D.P. , Martin , W.C. , & Spurlock , B. ( 2015 ). Attendance effects of FBS transition and
Brian P. McCullough, Madeleine Orr, and Nicholas M. Watanabe
. doi:10.1080/14775080902965207 10.1080/14775080902965207 Pfahl , M. ( 2011 ). Sport and the natural environment: A strategic guide . Dubuque, IA : Kendall Hunt . Porteshawver , A. ( 2010 ). Under review: Stadium construction and sate environmental policy acts . Marquette Sports Law Review
Timothy D. DeSchriver, Timothy Webb, Scott Tainsky, and Adrian Simion
://www.midwestliving.com/travel/wisconsin/green-bay/explore-green-bays-new-titletown-entertainment-district/ Miller , P.A. ( 2002 ). The economic impact of sports stadium construction: The case of the construction industry in St. Louis, MO . Journal of Urban Affairs, 24 ( 2 ), 159 – 173 . doi:10.1111/1467-9906.00120 10.1111/1467-9906.00120 Mondello , M. , & Kamke , C. ( 2014 ). The introduction and