The purpose of this study was to investigate instruction and assessment of fundamental movement skills (FMSs) by Physical Education (PE) teachers of Year 7 girls. Of 168 secondary school PE teachers, many had received little FMSs professional development, and although most assessed student FMSs proficiency, the quality of assessment was variable. Neither years of experience nor confidence influenced the quality of assessment tools used; however, greater FMSs training improved assessment practice regularity. Teachers more recently out of preservice were more confident in demonstrating FMSs. The results suggest that FMSs education for teachers should be a priority inclusion in both the training of preservice teachers and the ongoing professional development of in-service teachers.
Natalie Jayne Lander, Lisa Michele Barnett, Helen Brown and Amanda Telford
Natalie J. Lander, Lisa Hanna, Helen Brown, Amanda Telford, Philip J. Morgan, Jo Salmon and Lisa M. Barnett
Competence in fundamental movement skills (FMSs) is positively associated with physical activity, fitness, and healthy weight status. However, adolescent girls exhibit very low levels of fundamental movement skill (FMS) proficiency.
In the current study, interviews were carried out with physical education teachers to investigate their perspectives of: (i) the importance and relevance of teaching FMSs to Year 7 girls, and (ii) the factors influencing effective FMS instruction.
There were two major findings in the data: Year 7 was perceived to be a critical period to instruct girls in FMSs; and current teaching practices were perceived to be suboptimal for effective FMS instruction.
Apparent deficits in current FMS teaching practice may be improved with more comprehensive teacher training (both during physical education teacher education (PETE) and in in-service professional development) in pedagogical strategies, curriculum interpretation, and meaningful assessment.
Judith Jiménez, Maria Morera, Walter Salazar and Carl Gabbard
Motor skill competence has been associated with physical activity level, fitness, and other relevant health-related characteristics. Recent research has focused on understanding these relationships in children and adolescents, but little is known about subsequent years. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between fundamental motor skill (FMS) ability and body mass index (BMI) in young adults.
Participants, 40 men and 40 women (M age = 19.25 yr, SD = 2.48), were assessed for BMI and motor competence with 10 fundamental motor skills (FMSs) using the Test for Fundamental Motor Skills in Adults (TFMSA).
BMI was negatively associated with total motor ability (r = –.257; p = .02) and object control skills (r = –.251; p = .02); the relationship with locomotor skills was marginally insignificant (r = –.204; p = .07). In regard to individual skills, a significant negative association was found for running, jumping, striking, and kicking (ps < .05). Multiple regression analysis indicated that BMI and gender predicted 42% of the variance in total FMS score; gender was the only significant predictor.
Overall, these preliminary findings suggest that young adults with higher FMS ability are more likely to have lower BMI scores.
Umut Ziya Kocak and Bayram Unver
investigated test among them. 13 , 14 , 22 The FMS is used to evaluate dynamic movement and function to provide information for preventing injury by identifying the inadequacies during movements. 13 , 14 , 23 , 24 Although the FMS’s original intention is not to predict injury but rather to classify movement
Xiangli Gu, Senlin Chen and Xiaoxia Zhang
.20 min/day). They showed relatively lower competency levels for FMSs (particularly locomotor skills, which are lower than the national average for kindergarteners), body composition (55% in HFZ), and fitness knowledge ( M / SD = 57%/16%). Over two-thirds of the students achieved HFZ for upper body
Layne Case and Joonkoo Yun
-size statistics Intervention type k g SE s 2 95% CI p FMS 11 0.68 0.12 0.02 [0.44, 0.92] <.001 PA 3 1.20 0.40 0.16 [0.41, 1.98] .003 Tech 4 1.42 1.12 1.26 [−0.78, 3.62] .206 EAT 2 1.20 0.12 0.03 [0.67, 1.37] .005 Note . FMSs = fundamental motor skills; PA = physical activity; Tech = technology; EAT =equestrian