Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 10 of 13 items for :

  • "bench throw" x
  • Refine by Access: All Content x
Clear All
Restricted access

Kieran P. Young, G. Gregory Haff, Robert U. Newton, Tim J. Gabbett, and Jeremy M. Sheppard

Purpose:

To evaluate whether the dynamic strength index (DSI: ballistic peak force/isometric peak force) could be effectively used to guide specific training interventions and detect training-induced changes in maximal and ballistic strength.

Methods:

Twenty-four elite male athletes were assessed in the isometric bench press and a 45% 1-repetition-maximum (1RM) ballistic bench throw using a force plate and linear position transducer. The DSI was calculated using the peak force values obtained during the ballistic bench throw and isometric bench press. Athletes were then allocated into 2 groups as matched pairs based on their DSI and strength in the 1RM bench press. Over the 5 wk of training, athletes performed either high-load (80–100% 1RM) bench press or moderate-load (40–55% 1RM) ballistic bench throws.

Results:

The DSI was sensitive to disparate training methods, with the bench-press group increasing isometric bench-press peak force (P = .035, 91% likely), and the ballistic-bench-throw group increasing bench-throw peak force to a greater extent (P ≤ .001, 83% likely). A significant increase (P ≤ .001, 93% likely) in the DSI was observed for both groups.

Conclusions:

The DSI can be used to guide specific training interventions and can detect training-induced changes in isometric bench-press and ballistic bench-throw peak force over periods as short as 5 wk.

Restricted access

Abderrahmane Rahmani, Pierre Samozino, Jean-Benoit Morin, and Baptiste Morel

methods. 26 Thus, the computation method presented here can be considered valid to estimate the mean force and velocity produced during a bench throw. Between-trials reliability (ie, for a same load) is also an important parameter to validate when using a new method. This was done through the calculation

Restricted access

Ilias Smilios, Konstantinos Sotiropoulos, Karolina Barzouka, Marios Christou, and Savvas P. Tokmakidis

Purpose:

This study examined the acute effects of contrast loading on mechanical power output during bench-press throws in junior volleyball players.

Method:

Eleven males (age: 16.5 ± 0.5 years) performed a contrast loading and a control protocol. The contrast protocol included the execution of 3 bench-throws with a 30% load of 1RM, after 3 min a conditioning set of 5 bench-throws with a 60% load of 1RM and after 3 and 5 min two more sets of 3 bench-throws with a 30% load of 1RM. The control protocol included the execution of 3 sets of 3 bench-throws with a 30% load of 1RM at the same time points as in the contrast protocol without the execution of the conditioning set.

Results:

Mechanical power with a 30% load was higher (p < .05) 3 and 5 min following the conditioning set at the contrast protocol compared with the control protocol (8.7 ± 7.5 and 10.4 ± 3.4%, respectively). High correlations (p < .05) were obtained between participant’s relative maximal strength (r = .87) and power (r = .82) and the increases in power output.

Conclusion:

Contrast loading increases upper body power output produced with a light load by junior athletes. The potential for increased upper body performance is more evident in stronger or more powerful individuals.

Restricted access

Robert U. Newton, William J. Kraemer, Keijo Häkkinen, Brendan J. Humphries, and Aron J. Murphy

The aim of this study was to investigate the kinematics, kinetics, and neural activation of the traditional bench press movement performed explosively and the explosive bench throw in which the barbell was projected from the hands. Seventeen male subjects completed three trials with a bar weight of 45% of the subject's previously determined 1RM. Performance was significantly higher during the throw movement compared to the press for average velocity, peak velocity, average force, average power, and peak power. Average muscle activity during the concentric phase for pectoralis major, anterior deltoid, triceps brachii, and biceps brachii was higher for the throw condition. It was concluded that performing traditional press movements rapidly with light loads does not create ideal loading conditions for the neuromuscular system with regard to explosive strength production, especially in the final stages of the movement, because ballistic weight loading conditions where the resistance was accelerated throughout the movement resulted in a greater velocity of movement, force output, and EMG activity.

Restricted access

Kieran P. Young, G. Gregory Haff, Robert U. Newton, and Jeremy M. Sheppard

Purpose:

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of an isometric-bench-press (IBP) test performed across 4 elbow angles and a ballistic bench throw (BBT) using a relative load, as well as evaluating the reliability of the dynamic strength index (DSI: BBT peak force/IBP peak force).

Methods:

Twenty-four elite male athletes performed the IBP and a 45% 1-repetition-maximum BBT on 2 separate days with 48 h between testing occasions. Peak force, peak power, peak velocity, peak displacement, and peak rate of force development (PRFD) were assessed using a force plate and linear position transducer. Reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation (ICC), coefficient of variation (%CV) and typical error.

Results:

Performance measures in the BBT, such as peak force, peak velocity, peak power, and peak displacement, were considered reliable (ICC = .85–.92, %CV = 1.7–3.3), while PRFD was not (ICC = .43, %CV = 4.1). Similarly, for the IBP, peak force across all angles was considered reliable (ICC = .89–.97, %CV = 1.2–1.6), while PRFD was not (ICC = .56–.65, %CV = 0.5–7.6). The DSI was also reliable (ICC = .93, %CV = 3.5).

Conclusions:

Performance measures such as peak force in the IBP and BBT are reliable when assessing upper-body pressing-strength qualities in elite male athletes. Furthermore, the DSI is reliable and could potentially be used to detect qualities of relative deficiency and guide specific training interventions.

Restricted access

Sasa Djuric, Ivan Cuk, Sreten Sreckovic, Dragan Mirkov, Aleksandar Nedeljkovic, and Slobodan Jaric

Purpose:

To explore the effects of training against mechanically different types of loads on muscle force (F), velocity (V), and power (P) outputs.

Methods:

Subjects practiced maximum bench throws over 8 wk against a bar predominantly loaded by approximately constant external force (weight), weight plates (weight plus inertia), or weight plates whose weight was compensated by a constant external force pulling upward (inertia). Instead of a typically applied single trial performed against a selected load, the pretest and posttest consisted of the same task performed against 8 different loads ranging from 30% to 79% of the subject’s maximum strength applied by adding weight plates to the bar. That provided a range of F and V data for subsequent modeling by linear FV regression revealing the maximum F (F-intercept), V (V-intercept), and P (P = FV/4).

Results:

Although all 3 training conditions resulted in increased P, the inertia type of the training load could be somewhat more effective than weight. An even more important finding was that the P increase could be almost exclusively based on a gain in F, V, or both when weight, inertia, or weight-plus-inertia training load were applied, respectively.

Conclusions:

The inertia training load is more effective than weight in increasing P and weight and inertia may be applied for selective gains in F and V, respectively, whereas the linear FV model obtained from loaded trials could be used for discerning among muscle F, V, and P.

Restricted access

Mark G.L. Sayers and Stephen Bishop

strength coaches wishing to quantify high-velocity, light-load upper body pushing power. References 1. Alemany JA , Pandorf CE , Montain SJ , et al . Reliability assessment of ballistic jump squats and bench throws . J Strength Cond Res. 2005 ; 19 ( 1 ), 33 – 38 . PubMed doi: 10

Restricted access

Alasdair Strokosch, Loic Louit, Laurent Seitz, Richard Clarke, and Jonathan D. Hughes

effects of 3 heavy bench presses accommodated with chains on 60-kg weighted bench throw performance. The reported PPO was increased by 4.8% to 7.7% across 3 sets. Seitz et al 11 published the only study to date investigating the potentiation of horizontal jump performance across multiple contrast sets

Restricted access

Simon A. Feros, Kris Hinck, and Jake Dwyer

potentiation to prevail, creating a “window of opportunity” to increase bowling speed. 16 Prior research on professional rugby athletes reported muscle performance in the countermovement jump and ballistic bench throw to be significantly enhanced 8 minutes after the conditioning activity. 20 , 21

Restricted access

Lucas A. Pereira, Felipe Romano, Mateus Alves, Valter P. Mercer, Chris Bishop, Emerson Franchini, and Irineu Loturco

circuit training, running workouts, and/or jump rope; S/PT, strength–power training involving 4 to 6 series of 4 to 8 repetitions of upper- and lower-body traditional and ballistic exercises (half squat, jump squat, prone row, bench press, and bench throw) executed mainly under light to moderate