Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 10 of 71 items for :

  • "functional movement screen" x
Clear All
Restricted access

Brittany R. Crosby, Justin M. Stanek, Daniel J. Dodd and Rebecca L. Begalle

Key Points ▸ Movement screens are commonly used in athletic populations. ▸ Footwear has previously been shown to affect an individual’s stability. ▸ Footwear has no effect on Functional Movement Screen ® scores. A popular screening method used throughout sports medicine, specific to analysis of

Restricted access

Mahsa Jafari, Vahid Zolaktaf and Gholamali Ghasemi

physical dysfunctions exposing people to injury. Second, you need an effective program to train them to overcome such dysfunctions. To achieve these objectives, it is recommended to use functional movement screen (FMS). 4 It determines the mobility and stability deficits, caused by asymmetry and

Restricted access

Alex T. Strauss, Austin J. Parr, Daniel J. Desmond, Ashmel T. Vargas and Russell T. Baker

screens in physically active populations. 9 – 12 The Functional Movement Screen (FMS ™ ) is a screening system designed to assess stability and mobility within full-body movements while identifying movement asymmetries and evaluating overall movement quality. 8 , 13 The FMS ™ may be used as a general

Restricted access

Constantine P. Nicolozakes, Daniel K. Schneider, Benjamin D. Roewer, James R. Borchers and Timothy E. Hewett

accurately predict football-related injuries are an important step toward identifying factors that may reduce injury risk. The functional movement screen (FMS™) is a screening method that was developed to identify movement asymmetries and deficiencies using fundamental exercises to assess the whole

Restricted access

Kanako Shimoura, Yasuaki Nakayama, Yuto Tashiro, Takayuki Hotta, Yusuke Suzuki, Seishiro Tasaka, Tomofumi Matsushita, Keisuke Matsubara, Mirei Kawagoe, Takuya Sonoda, Yuki Yokota and Tomoki Aoyama

and single-leg hop 10 or static balance. 11 However, a comprehensive assessment is needed for basketball due to the variety of injuries and risk factors. In the present study, we used the functional movement screen (FMS), 12 , 13 which comprehensively assesses movement dysfunction and is used to

Restricted access

Umut Ziya Kocak and Bayram Unver

-based tests have been described to identify deficiencies in neuromuscular skills associated with increased injury risk. 13 – 21 These include the functional movement screen (FMS), Y-balance test, core stabilization tests, 9-test battery, and landing error scoring system. The FMS may be the most frequently

Restricted access

Marissa J. Basar, Justin M. Stanek, Daniel D. Dodd and Rebecca L. Begalle

Regulation 670-1; this included: (1) black, moisture-wicking running trunks; (2) gray, short sleeve Improved Physical Fitness Uniform T-shirt; (3) commercial running shoes; (4) calf-length or ankle-length, plain white or black socks with no logos; and (5) reflective belt. 32 Functional Movement Screen The 7

Open access

Eric P. Scibek, Matthew F. Moran and Susan L. Edmond

The functional movement screen (FMS) is a screening tool that consists of 7 tests developed to identify physically active individuals that may be at risk for sustaining musculoskeletal injury. 1 – 3 These tests are meant to assess fundamental movement patterns 2 that require a combination of

Restricted access

Eric A. Sorenson

Context:

The Functional Movement Screen (FMS) consists of a battery of seven tests that are widely used to systematically evaluate movement.

Objective:

To evaluate the interrater agreement and intrarater reliability of FMS scores assigned by athletic trainers who reviewed video recordings of the movements.

Design:

Interrater agreement and test–retest intrarater reliability.

Setting:

Laboratory.

Subjects:

Eight athletic trainers rated the movements of 15 college-aged participants.

Measurements:

Component and composite FMS scores.

Results:

Median values for interrater agreement (0.90) and intrarater reliability (0.88) of the FMS composite score were acceptable. With the exception of the rotary stability test, all of the component scores demonstrated acceptable values for scoring consistency (> 0.80).

Conclusions:

Both component and composite FMS scores assigned by athletic trainers were highly consistent, both in terms of scores assigned by different raters and scores assigned by the same raters on two different occasions.

Restricted access

Lisa M. Stobierski, Shirleeah D. Fayson, Lindsay M. Minthorn, Tamara C. Valovich McLeod and Cailee E. Welch

Clinical Scenario:

Injuries are inevitable in the physically active population. As a part of preventive medicine, health care professionals often seek clinical tools that can be used in real time to identify factors that may predispose individuals to these injuries. The Functional Movement Screen (FMS), a clinical tool consisting of 7 individual tasks, has been reported as useful in identifying individuals in various populations that may be susceptible to musculoskeletal injuries. If factors that may predispose physically active individuals to injury could be identified before participation, clinicians may be able to develop a training plan based on FMS scores, which could potentially decrease the likelihood of injury and overall time missed from physical activities. However, in order for a screening tool to be used clinically, it must demonstrate acceptable reliability.

Focused Clinical Question:

Are clinicians reliable at scoring the FMS, in real time, to assess movement patterns of physically active individuals?