, 2007 ). However, most of the research pertaining to gaze behavior and visual attention has been conducted under laboratory settings and focused on self-paced tasks (e.g., Vine, Moore, & Wilson, 2011 ). In addition, in the case of tennis, most gaze behavior studies targeted the server’s kinematics as
Camilo Sáenz-Moncaleano, Itay Basevitch, and Gershon Tenenbaum
Johannes Meyer, Frowin Fasold, Karsten Schul, Matthias Sonnenschein, and Stefanie Klatt
team sports, athletes receive such information from their opponents’ body language, which allows them to thereby draw conclusions about the opponent’s intention ( Frith & Frith, 2006 ). Several studies have investigated the gaze behavior of athletes in basketball in laboratory settings (e
Christopher M. Janelle, Charles H. Hillman, Ross J. Apparies, Nicholas P. Murray, Launi Meili, Elizabeth A. Fallon, and Bradley D. Hatfield
The purpose of this study was to examine whether variability in gaze behavior and cortical activation would differentiate expert (n = 12) and nonexpert (n = 13) small-bore rifle shooters. Spectral-activity and eye-movement data were collected concurrently during the course of a regulation indoor sequence of 40 shots from the standing position. Experts exhibited significantly superior shooting performance, as well as a significantly longer quiet eye period preceding shot execution than did nonexperts. Additionally, expertise interacted with hemispheric activation levels: Experts demonstrated a significant increase in left-hemisphere alpha and beta power, accompanied by a reduction in right-hemisphere alpha and beta power, during the preparatory period just prior to the shot. Nonexperts exhibited similar hemispheric asymmetry, but to a lesser extent than did experts. Findings suggest systematic expertise-related differences in ocular and cortical activity during the preparatory phase leading up to the trigger pull that reflects more optimal organization of the neural structures needed to achieve high-level performance.
Thomas Hausegger, Christian Vater, and Ernst-Joachim Hossner
come as a surprise that experts show a distinct gaze behavior in their sport that differs from that of less-experienced athletes ( Mann, Williams, Ward, & Janelle, 2007 ). For example, Williams and Davids ( 1998 ) found that skilled soccer players in a defensive situation shift their gaze more often
Arne Nieuwenhuys, J. Rob Pijpers, Raôul R.D. Oudejans, and Frank C. Bakker
The object of the current study was to investigate anxiety-induced changes in movement and gaze behavior in novices on a climbing wall. Identical traverses were situated at high and low levels on a climbing wall to manipulate anxiety. In line with earlier studies, climbing times and movement times increased under anxiety. These changes were accompanied by similar changes in total and average fixation duration and the number of fixations, which were primarily aimed at the holds used for climbing. In combination with these findings, a decrease in search rate provided evidence for a decrease in processing efficiency as anxiety increased.
André Klostermann, Ralf Kredel, and Ernst-Joachim Hossner
To date, despite a large body of evidence in favor of the advantage of an effect-related focus of attention compared with a movement-related focus of attention in motor control and learning, the role of vision in this context remains unclear. Therefore, in a golf-putting study, the relation between attentional focus and gaze behavior (in particular, quiet eye, or QE) was investigated. First, the advantage of an effect-related focus, as well as of a long QE duration, could be replicated. Furthermore, in the online-demanding task of golf putting, high performance was associated with later QE offsets. Most decisively, an interaction between attentional focus and gaze behavior was revealed in such a way that the efficiency of the QE selectively manifested under movement-related focus instructions. As these findings suggest neither additive effects nor a causal chain, an alternative hypothesis is introduced explaining positive QE effects by the inhibition of not-to-be parameterized movement variants.
Eesha J. Shah, Jia Yi Chow, and Marcus J.C. Lee
relationship between expertise and a specific gaze behavior, the quiet eye (QE; Mann, Williams, Ward, & Janelle, 2007 ; Vickers, 2016 ). QE is defined as the final fixation directed to an object or location in the task space within 3° of visual angle for a minimum of 100 ms prior to the initiation of a
Chris Englert, Kris Zwemmer, Alex Bertrams, and Raôul R.D. Oudejans
In the current study we investigated whether ego depletion negatively affects attention regulation under pressure in sports by assessing participants’ dart throwing performance and accompanying gaze behavior. According to the strength model of self-control, the most important aspect of self-control is attention regulation. Because higher levels of state anxiety are associated with impaired attention regulation, we chose a mixed design with ego depletion (yes vs. no) as between-subjects and anxiety level (high vs. low) as within-subjects factor. Participants performed a perceptual-motor task requiring selective attention, namely, dart throwing. In line with our expectations, depleted participants in the high-anxiety condition performed worse and displayed a shorter final fixation on bull’s eye, demonstrating that when one’s self-control strength is depleted, attention regulation under pressure cannot be maintained. This is the first study that directly supports the general assumption that ego depletion is a major factor in influencing attention regulation under pressure.
Oliver R. Runswick, Matthew Jewiss, Ben T. Sharpe, and Jamie S. North
in the field of perceptual-motor control have investigated how task constraints affect gaze behavior, anxiety, and cognitive effort to glean a broader understanding of the factors affecting performance. To this end, researchers have examined how QE is affected by factors such as physiological arousal
André Klostermann, Ralf Kredel, and Ernst-Joachim Hossner
increased the number of eye movements and eye blinks. In addition, the rather short intertrial durations might have evoked time pressure, which has also been found to interfere with gaze behavior in QE studies (e.g., Behan & Wilson, 2008 ; Williams, Singer, & Frehlich, 2002 , Experiment 2). The third