Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 2 of 2 items for :

  • "high velocity power" x
Clear All
Restricted access

Mark G.L. Sayers and Stephen Bishop

The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability of a new upper body medicine ball push-press (MBP-P) test. Twenty-three strength trained volunteers performed a series of supine MBP-P throws using loads representing 5% and10% of their 5RM bench press (5 repetitions at each load). Throws were performed on a force platform (2000 Hz), with medicine ball kinematic data collected using a high-speed motion capture (500 Hz). Testing was repeated after 7–10 days to quantify intertest reliability. Maximal force (Fmax), impulse at Fmax, time to Fmax, and maximum rate of force development (RFDmax) were all calculated from the force platform outputs, with maximum ball velocity (Velmax) and maximum ball acceleration (Accelmax) developed from the kinematic data. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation (ICC), coefficient of variation (%CV), and typical error. Medicine ball kinematic variables were more reliable (CV% = 2.6–5.3, ICC = 0.87–0.95) than the various force platform derived power variables (CV% = 7.9–26.7, ICC = 0.51–0.90). The MBP-P test produces reliable data and can be used to quantify many standard power based measures, with the key findings have implications for athletic populations requiring high velocity, light load upper body pushing power.

Restricted access

Guy C. Wilson, Yorgi Mavros, Lotti Tajouri and Maria Fiatarone Singh

the most common AE. The RT trials focused on whole-body muscle strengthening, and one trial included two lower limb high-velocity power exercises as well ( Pereira, Costa, et al., 2012 , 2013 ). Exercise dose Some elements of the exercise prescription related to dose were incompletely reported in