Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 3 of 3 items for :

  • "instructional choices" x
Clear All
Restricted access

Bulent Agbuga, Ping Xiang, Ron E. McBride and Xiaoxia Su

Purpose:

Framed within self-determination theory, this study examined relationships among perceived instructional choices (cognitive, organizational, and procedural), autonomy need satisfaction, and engagement (behavioral, cognitive, and emotional) among Turkish students in middle school physical education.

Methods:

Participants consisted of 246 (124 boys, 122 girls) middle school students enrolled in physical education classes at four public schools in the west Turkey. Questionnaires were used to collect the data.

Results:

Perceived cognitive, organizational and procedural choices were found all important to students’ autonomy need satisfaction and/or engagement. Autonomy need satisfaction fully or partially mediated the relationships between perceived instructional choices and engagement.

Discussion/Conclusion:

The study provides empirical data that instructional choices supported student autonomy need satisfaction, and were related to student engagement in middle school physical education.

Restricted access

Cathal Óg O’Sullivan, Melissa Parker, Tom Comyns and Annmarie Ralph

et al., 2018 ). Teachers can provide instructional choices for students at three levels: organizational, procedural, and cognitive ( Stefanou, Perencevich, DiCintio, & Turner, 2004 ). Organizational choice includes letting students select group members or partners. Procedural includes allowing

Restricted access

Cédric Roure and Denis Pasco

to the lateral zones and shuttlecock trajectories, and (3) exploration intention through the choice of three different strikes to score points. References Agbuga , B. , Xiang , P. , McBride , R.E. , & Su , X. ( 2016 ). Student perceptions of instructional choices in middle school physical