Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 3 of 3 items for :

  • "parasport models" x
  • Refine by Access: All Content x
Clear All
Restricted access

Jacqueline Martins Patatas, Jens De Rycke, Veerle De Bosscher, and Rafael Lima Kons

The literature suggests that the current athlete development models do not reflect the multifaceted developmental pathways in Paralympic sport. This study aimed to analyze how parasport athletes progress through developmental phases of an athletic career pathway by comparing differences in their trajectories based on the nature of the impairment (acquired or congenital), age, and sex. A total of 345 para-athletes representing 15 sports completed an online survey. Results showed that the developmental phases for athletes with acquired impairment are of shorter duration, taking 4.5 years to progress from the attraction to the elite phase, while athletes with congenital impairment take 6 years. Athletes with congenital impairment start in parasport approximately 8 years younger and win medals in international competitions 7 years earlier than athletes with acquired impairment. Insights gathered in this study have the potential to enhance further thinking toward the genesis of specific models of para-athlete development.

Restricted access

Danielle Peers, Timothy Konoval, and Rebecca Marsh Naturkach

Organizations (NSOs) and often Provincial Sport Organizations (PSOs) are increasingly mandated to support parasports and para-athletes throughout the athlete development pathway. Evidence suggests, however, that the integrated parasport model in Canada has not become the bastion of inclusion that it was

Open access

Andrew M. Hammond, Andrea Bundon, Caitlin Pentifallo Gadd, and Tim Konoval

and inclusive programming available. Peers et al. ( 2020 ) concluded by saying that the “integrated parasport model in Canada has not become the bastion of inclusion that it was intended to be” (p. 112). While Peers et al. ( 2020 ) have illuminated how different track-and-field organizations enact