Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 10 of 845 items for :

  • "ratings of perceived exertion" x
  • All content x
Clear All
Restricted access

Carl Foster, Daniel Boullosa, Michael McGuigan, Andrea Fusco, Cristina Cortis, Blaine E. Arney, Bo Orton, Christopher Dodge, Salvador Jaime, Kim Radtke, Teun van Erp, Jos J. de Koning, Daniel Bok, Jose A. Rodriguez-Marroyo, and John P. Porcari

The session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE) method is 25 years old, as of 2020. Since the index paper, 1 in 1995, the method has become a popular alternative to represent exercise intensity versus objective methods such as heart rate (HR) and blood lactate. Reflecting this, in Google Scholar

Restricted access

Blaine E. Arney, Reese Glover, Andrea Fusco, Cristina Cortis, Jos J. de Koning, Teun van Erp, Salvador Jaime, Richard P. Mikat, John P. Porcari, and Carl Foster

to quantify internal TL using a modification of the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) method developed by Borg. 6 This method is known as the session RPE (sRPE). The sRPE is derived by multiplying the overall RPE obtained at the end of a training session, using the Borg category-ratio 10 scale

Restricted access

Jose A. Rodríguez-Marroyo, Beltrán González, Carl Foster, Ana Belén Carballo-Leyenda, and José G. Villa

rating of perceived exertion (sRPE) instead of heart rate (HR) to monitor exercise training. Internal TL can easily be calculated by multiplying the training sRPE by the training session duration. Originally, Foster et al 3 , 4 obtained the sRPE using a modified Borg category ratio (0–10) provided ∼30

Restricted access

Ric Lovell, Sam Halley, Jason Siegler, Tony Wignell, Aaron J. Coutts, and Tim Massard

Ratings of perceived exertion (RPEs) represent an individual’s psychobiological response to an activity stimulus. These subjective evaluations of exertion are integrated from signals originating in working muscles and joints, cardiorespiratory, and central nervous systems. 1 In applied sports

Restricted access

Lilian Roos, Wolfgang Taube, Carolin Tuch, Klaus Michael Frei, and Thomas Wyss

, duration, frequency, and activity type, to assess external TL and other parameters, such as heart rate (HR), blood lactate, oxygen consumption, well-being, motivation, pain, and rating of perceived exertion (RPE), to describe the internal TL. 1 , 2 To assess the overall TL and compare it among various

Restricted access

Wouter Schallig, Tim Veneman, Dionne A. Noordhof, José A. Rodríguez-Marroyo, John P. Porcari, Jos J. de Koning, and Carl Foster

effort and perceived exertion may be different concepts, 24 the rating-of-perceived-exertion (RPE) scale 25 is used to measure both the perceived exertion within the anticipatory model 7 and the perception of effort within the psychobiological model. 26 So, irrespective of whether the experienced RPE

Restricted access

Cristian Ieno, Roberto Baldassarre, Maddalena Pennacchi, Antonio La Torre, Marco Bonifazi, and Maria Francesca Piacentini

spent at high intensity. 2 Regarding the use of the session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE) method, Seiler and Kjerland 3 have shown a correspondence with the SG-based methods, while 2 recent studies 1 , 4 found a disconnection between the TID based on the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) or HR

Restricted access

Fabio R. Serpiello and Will G. Hopkins

Session ratings of perceived exertion (sRPE) have been used extensively in team sports to measure internal load, which is defined as the subjective responses to an external load. 1 While the validity of sRPE to measure load has been demonstrated in adults, the results of studies conducted in youth

Restricted access

Robert H. Mann, Craig A. Williams, Bryan C. Clift, and Alan R. Barker

. Consequently, the session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE), an athlete’s subjective RPE multiplied by session duration (in minutes), has been established as a simple and valid measure of ITL. 7 Based on the formative research of Foster et al, 8 sRPE is typically reported 30 minutes following session

Restricted access

Youri Geurkink, Gilles Vandewiele, Maarten Lievens, Filip de Turck, Femke Ongenae, Stijn P.J. Matthys, Jan Boone, and Jan G. Bourgois

of a training session’s duration and intensity. 2 Duration is quantifiable in time and relatively easy to measure. On the other hand, intensity can be quantified using different methods, such as heart rate (HR) monitoring, blood lactate concentrations, and the (session) rating of perceived exertion