This article discusses issues surrounding the potential violation of sexual boundaries in sport psychology consultancy and critically evaluates the current state of knowledge in the field. Limited discussion and research relating to this ethical issue exists within sport psychology; the discussion that has occurred has mainly focused on erotic transference and countertransference (Andersen, 2005). Research and knowledge from clinical psychology, counseling psychology, and psychotherapy proffers ideas for discussion and research into the factors that precipitate sexual boundary violations. The relevance of the controversial practice of touch as a therapeutic tool and a stimulus for sexual boundary violations is considered, alongside implications for the training of neophyte practitioners through role-playing, peer support, and supervision.
Guy Little and Chris Harwood
Tanya R. Prewitt-White
between coaches and athletes; (2) the difference between personal and professional boundaries; (3) the warning signs of potential boundary violations; (4) the need for all parties to avoid boundary violations; (5) the harm caused by sexual boundary violations; and, (6) acknowledging barriers to