Sport consumer behavior (SCB) research continues to grow in both popularity and sophistication. A guiding principle in much of this research has focused on the nature of sport-related experiences and the benefits sport consumers derive from these experiences. This emphasis has generated new knowledge and insights into the needs and wants of sport consumers. Although these efforts have contributed to the field’s understanding of SCB, the vast majority of this research has centered on psychological phenomena and the evaluative and affective components of these sport experiences. Approaches to this work have also narrowed, with SCB research predominately relying on cross-sectional studies and attitudinal surveys to collect information. This has resulted in limited findings that seldom account for how various situational or environmental factors might influence attitudinal data patterns at the individual and group level. This special issues seeks to deepen our understanding of SCB by providing seven papers that demonstrate or validate findings using multiple studies or data collections.
Daniel Funk, Daniel Lock, Adam Karg, and Mark Pritchard
Jonathan A. Jensen, Brian A. Turner, Jeffrey James, Chad McEvoy, Chad Seifried, Elizabeth Delia, T. Christopher Greenwell, Stephen Ross, and Patrick Walsh
Published 4 decades ago, “Basking in Reflected Glory: Three (Football) Field Studies” (Cialdini et al., 1976) is the most influential study of sport consumer behavior. This article features re-creations of Studies 1 and 2, exactly 40 years after the original publication. The results of Study 1 were reproduced, with participants more than twice as likely to wear school-affiliated apparel after wins and 55% less likely after losses. The study also extends the BIRGing literature in its investigation of the influence of gender and the effect’s salience over time. Study 2’s results were not reproduced. However, study participants were significantly more likely to use first-person plural pronouns, providing further empirical evidence of BIRGing behaviors. This article makes a novel contribution to the sport consumer behavior literature by advancing the study of one of the field’s most foundational theories and serving as an impetus for future investigations of BIRGing motivations.
Yu Kyoum Kim and Galen Trail
This study focused on developing a model to explain relationships among constraints, motivators, and attendance, and empirically test the proposed model within the spectator sport context. The proposed model explained 34% of variance in Attendance. Results showed that Attachment to the Team, an internal motivator, entered first and explained approximately 21% of the variance in attendance. Lack of Success, an internal constraint, entered next and explained almost 10% additional variance. Leisure Alternatives, an external constraint entered next and explained an additional 3%. The ability to properly evaluate constraints and motivators gives sport marketers the opportunity to more effectively serve existing fans, as well as attract new fans.
Craig Hyatt, Shannon Kerwin, Larena Hoeber, and Katherine Sveinson
long-lasting persistent fandom (first developing an awareness that specific sports or teams exist and then being attracted to them), Funk and James ( 2001 ) and other sport consumer behavior researchers have noted that potential socializing agents may typically include family members and friends
Ben Larkin and Janet S. Fink
collective narcissism construct to sport consumer behavior scholars and explore its role in predicting many of the negative consequences that have long been associated with sport fans (e.g., dysfunctional fandom, hostile aggression, and instrumental aggression) but have been cast as being symptomatic of a
Mohsen Behnam, Mikihiro Sato, Bradley J. Baker, Vahid Delshab, and Mathieu Winand
In modern organizations, knowledge is the fundamental basis of competition ( Lopez-Nicolas & Molina-Castillo, 2008 ). Understanding what affects sport consumers’ behavioral intentions toward provided services is a crucial function of sports organizations to enhance their profitability and
Matthew Katz, Bob Heere, and E. Nicole Melton
value through sport–fan interactions ( Woratschek, Horbel, & Popp, 2014 ). Previous scholars have called for utilizing network approaches in studying diverse sport topics ( Quatman & Chelladurai, 2008 ; Wäsche, Dickson, Woll, & Brandes, 2017 ), including sport consumer behavior generally and the study
Matthew Katz, Thomas A. Baker III, and Hui Du
marketing scholars have long noted the importance of both personal relationships ( McPherson, 1976 ) and social interactions ( Melnick, 1993 ; Trail & James, 2001 ) in dictating sport consumer behaviors. Sport fans cocreate the value of their consumption experience by interacting with others and
Jun Woo Kim, Marshall Magnusen, and Hyun-Woo Lee
range that are mutually exclusive, which is representative of a traditional approach to the study of emotion. However, as it will be discussed in the next section, this is not the only perspective that can be used to frame emotions in sport consumer behavior contexts. Mixed Emotions There are two main
Xiaochen Zhou, Daniel C. Funk, Lu Lu, and Thilo Kunkel
consumers do not operate in a vacuum and sport consumption should be examined in conjunction with the general life, advocating for research on how sport consumer behavior is influenced by contextual factors and interact with nonathletic activities. The contemporary activewear industry provides an intriguing