Comparison of a Mobile Technology Application With the Balance Error Scoring System

in International Journal of Athletic Therapy and Training
View More View Less
  • 1 Wichita State University
Restricted access


The most widely used method for postural balance assessment relies on the subjective observations of a test administrator. Accelerometry has been shown to provide a valid and reliable method for assessment of balance, and recent advances in microelectromechanical systems have made the technology available in mobile electronic devices.


To compare a mobile technology application with a commonly used subjective balance assessment.


Biomechanics laboratory.


Twenty-one nonathlete college-aged individuals (7 men, 14 women; mean age 23 ± 3 years) volunteered to participate. Subjects were excluded if they reported any preexisting condition that might affect postural balance.


A strong inverse correlation was found between the scores for the two balance assessment methods (r = -.767, p < .01).


Advances in technology have provided an attractive means to objectively quantify postural balance with off-the-shelf mobile consumer electronic devices.

Jeremy A. Patterson is an Associate Professor in the Department of Human Performance Studies at Wichita State University and is the director of the Human Performance Laboratory and Clinical Director of the Center for Physical Activity and Aging.

Ryan Z. Amick is an Exercise Physiologist and is currently a Doctoral Candidate in the Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering at Wichita State University.

Priyanka D. Pandya is a Physical Therapist and in the Master's of Exercise Science program at Wichita State University.

Nils Hakansson is an Assistant Professor in the Bioengineering Program at Wichita State University.

Michael J. Jorgensen is an Associate Professor in the Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering at Wichita State University and is also the Coordinator of the Bioengineering Program.