Two Training-Load Paradoxes: Can We Work Harder and Smarter, Can Physical Preparation and Medical Be Teammates?

Click name to view affiliation

Tim J. Gabbett
Search for other papers by Tim J. Gabbett in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Rod Whiteley
Search for other papers by Rod Whiteley in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Open access

The authors have observed that in professional sporting organizations the staff responsible for physical preparation and medical care typically practice in relative isolation and display tension as regards their attitudes toward training-load prescription (much more and much less training, respectively). Recent evidence shows that relatively high chronic training loads, when they are appropriately reached, are associated with reduced injury risk and better performance. Understanding this link between performance and training loads removes this tension but requires a better understanding of the relationship between the acute:chronic workload ratio (ACWR) and its association with performance and injury. However, there remain many questions in the area of ACWR, and we are likely at an early stage of our understanding of these parameters and their interrelationships. This opinion paper explores these themes and makes recommendations for improving performance through better synergies in support-staff approaches. Furthermore, aspects of the ACWR that remain to be clarified—the role of shared decision making, risk:benefit estimation, and clearer accountability—are discussed.

Gabbett is the Inst for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Ipswich, Australia. Whiteley is with Aspetar Orthopedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar.

Address author correspondence to Rod Whiteley at Rodney.whiteley@aspetar.com.
  • Collapse
  • Expand
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 4469 925 129
PDF Downloads 2967 649 59