Because of the wide range of physiological, biomechanical, and anthropometrical demands in endurance sports, specialization is often considered a prerequisite for reaching an elite performance level. As an example, marathon runners display lower maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) than 5- to 10-km runners but compensate with a lower O2 cost of running to achieve superior performance in long events.1 Similarly, road cyclists who are uphill, flat, or time-trial specialists generally display anthropometrics and indexed VO2max values that are favorable for performance on either uphill or flat terrain, respectively.2,3
Cross-country (XC) skiing is a complex endurance sport consisting of several competition formats with durations ranging from ∼3 minutes (sprint, ∼1.3–1.8 km) to more than 2 hours (≤50 km) in World Cup (WC) and Olympic events. Consequently, an increasing number of athletes specialize, mainly competing in 1 or a few race formats to optimize physiological performance and rank; elite sprint-specialized skiers are heavier and have a larger anaerobic capacity but display lower body mass normalized VO2max compared with distance XC skiers, most likely due to a combination of genetics and training specificity.4
Recently, long-distance mass-start races such as the Ski Classics (a cup of long races separated from the WC), where athletes compete for ∼40 to 90 km using the classical technique, have become increasingly popular, and several male and a few female athletes have specialized their training to optimize performance in such events. Currently, very little is known about these “long-distance skiers,”5 and knowledge about the top athletes’ physiological capacities could provide useful information for athletes and coaches with regard to this race format’s specific demands. Because of the track layouts, improvements in equipment and track preparation allowing for higher speeds, and current trends, elite long-distance skiers use skis without grip wax and rely exclusively on the double poling (DP) technique in the majority of events. This is intriguing as DP relies solely on propulsion trough the poles, emphasizing the need for a well-developed upper-body capacity.5 Hence, long-distance skiers exercise their upper body frequently and may possess other physiological and technical qualities related to DP compared with “all-round skiers” who compete using both the skating and classical techniques in several race formats. In fact, only specialists have won the longest Ski Classics event over the last decade (Vasaloppet, 90 km), even though several world-class all-round skiers have competed.
During the last decade, the DP technique has been extensively analyzed, with studies focusing on different inclines,6 poling frequencies,7 subgroups of athletes,8 and kinematic changes during a race.9 However, to our knowledge, studies investigating the physiology and the technique of DP specialists are lacking. The only study to date found lower submaximal O2 cost and blood lactate concentrations ([La-]) in DP and equal VO2peak in both DP and diagonal skiing in elite long-distance skiers compared with all-round skiers. However, as the all-round skiers were defined as national class skiers with mean International Ski Federation’s (FIS) points as high as 121, it is questionable if these findings can be extrapolated to the elite performance level. Hence, it is currently unknown whether the long-distance skiers’ specialization with respect to training, to perform in long events using predominantly the DP technique, leads to any favorable technical or physiological adaptations compared with the elite all-round skiers.
The XC skiers are normally found to reach a peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) of “only” ∼90% of VO2max measured in diagonal skiing or VO2peak running when they do incremental exercise tests to exhaustion in DP.10–12 Although recently contradicted,13 this may partly be explained by the upper-body muscles having longer diffusional distances, shorter mean transit times, and lower oxidative capacity than leg muscles, even in well-trained XC skiers.14–16 Therefore, arm O2 extraction is found to be ∼10% lower than in leg muscles16 and contributes, together with a lower vascular conductance,17 to the ∼10% lower VO2peak observed in DP. Recently, it was suggested that training designed to enhance O2 extraction in the arms, such as high-volume, low-intensity upper-body training, could improve the DP VO2peak/VO2max ratio.18 Therefore, investigating this ratio in long-distance skiers could give some indication of whether the limiting factors can be improved with increased training specificity.
Hence, the present investigation aimed to (1) provide information regarding physiological capacities of elite male long-distance XC skiers and (2) investigate potential effects of specialization by comparing their physiological capacities and kinematics in DP to those of elite all-round skiers.
Methods
Subjects
Of the elite male long-distance skiers included in the present study, 6 of the 7 had podium placements in the (Marcialonga, Vasaloppet, Birkebeinerrennet, etc) Ski Classics and were ranked among the top 10 in the overall standings during the season they were tested in. All 6 male all-round skiers had competed in the FIS WC, with 5 of them finishing top 5 in 1 or more individual races in the previous season (Table 1). Within 2 seasons from data collection, the group of all-round skiers included 1 Olympic and 1 world champion (only individual races considered). The long-distance skiers were older than the all-round skiers (P = .04). However, this difference was not entirely an effect of our sampling, as it also existed between the top 10 WC and Ski Classics skiers (28.3 [3.9] vs 31.6 [5.9]; P = .07; season 2016–2017). All skiers were familiarized with treadmill testing, both in DP and running. The subjects were fully aware of the nature of the study and signed a written informed consent before participation. The study was approved by the ethical committee of the Norwegian School of Sport Sciences (05-130617) and reported to the Norwegian Center for Research Data (54405).
Characteristics of the 6 All-Round Skiers and 7 Long-Distance Skiers Included in the Study
All-round skiers | Long-distance skiers | ES (Cohen d) | |
---|---|---|---|
Age, y | 25.4 (2.6) | 32.0 (6.3)* | 1.31La |
Body height, cm | 181 (5) | 183 (6) | 0.32S |
Body mass, kg | 75.1 (5.5) | 75.7 (5.2) | 0.11T |
Body mass index, kg·m−2 | 23.0 (1.1) | 22.7 (0.8) | 0.26S |
FIS points (distance) 2016/2017 | 16.0 (12.4) | 38.1 (6.5)* | 2.29VL |
Ranking Ski Classics 2016/2017 | — | 6.9 (6.0) | — |
Note: Data are presented as mean (SD). Abbreviations: ES, effect size; FIS, International Ski Federation. Note: Superscript letters by the ESs denote their magnitude as T, trivial (ES < 0.2); S, small (0.2 ≤ ES < 0.6); M, moderate (0.6 ≤ ES < 1.2); La, large (1.2 ≤ ES < 2.0); and VL, very large (ES ≥ 2.0).23 The races in the Ski Classics Cup were in season 2016/2017 given a penalty of 35 points when FIS points were calculated as compared with 0 in World Cup, World Championship, or Olympic races.
*Significant difference between groups (P < .05).
Methodology
Testing was conducted in the late preparation phase (October) and consisted of submaximal workloads and an incremental test to exhaustion in DP, followed by a similar test in running ∼1.5 hours later (nonrandomized). The subjects were allowed to drink a carbohydrate and electrolyte-containing fluid ad libitum during breaks and to eat a small snack (such as an energy bar) between tests. The rationale for performing both tests on the same day was that the participants were elite skiers and that the testing needed to fit their schedule to recruit this highly trained group. The DP test was conducted first as we analyzed kinematics only in DP and as the DP data were evaluated as being the most important with respect to the purpose of the study. This may have affected submaximal and peak responses in running, but unlikely differently in the 2 groups. The day before testing, the skiers were restricted to perform any strenuous training (>75% of maximum heart rate [HR] or strength training).
Instruments
The poles (Triac 1.0; Swix, Lillehammer, Norway) were standardized to the nearest length (2.5 cm intervals) that corresponded to 88% of the athletes’ body height, as pole length has been shown to influence submaximal O2 cost, kinematics, and performance.22 The poles were 3.0 (1.0) cm longer than the maximum length allowed during competition the following winter (measured from pole tip to strap insertion), according to the new FIS regulation (84.7 ± 0.5% of the body height including shoes instead of 83%). Therefore, kinematic data may be affected by this, but unlikely any differently in the 2 groups as all subjects were familiarized to long pole lengths. An inertial measurement system (PLUX Wireless Biosignals S.A., Lisbon, Portugal) sampling at 1000 Hz was mounted on the skier’s right pole, and the cycle time, poling time, and reposition time were calculated on the basis of 10 consecutive cycles for each submaximal workload as previously described.24 Joint angles were derived from 50-Hz video analysis in the sagittal plane (Canon HF100; Canon Inc, Tokyo, Japan) using Tracker (Tracker version 4.95; Douglas Brown, Open Source Physics).22 The vertical center of mass (zCOM) was calculated as the weighted average of the COMs of each body segment and equipment, as previously described.22 The running test was conducted using a custom-made treadmill (Woodway GmbH, Weil am Rhein, Germany).
DP Test
All DP workloads were conducted at 2.5° incline, with the incline and speeds chosen to induce competition-relevant technique based on pilot testing and previous research.22 The subjects warmed up for 15 minutes at 10.8 km·h−1 (∼60%–70% of HRpeak-DP), with the last 5-minute serving as the first submaximal workload. Thereafter, the speed was increased by 1.8 km·h−1 (0.5 m·s−1) in each 5-minute step until the lactate threshold was exceeded. The estimated lactate threshold was defined as the highest speed before the [La-] on the first workload + 1.8 mmol·L−1 was exceeded, which corresponds well with the maximal lactate steady-state workload in DP.26 The athletes completed a total of 6 to 7 submaximal workloads (10.8–21.6 km·h−1; ∼45%–85% of VO2peak-DP), always separated by 1.5-minute breaks during which [La-] was immediately assessed. Cardiorespiratory variables were monitored continuously, and the averages of the last 2 minutes of each workload served as the steady-state values. After a 7-minute break including rest and active recovery (∼40% of VO2peak-DP), the incremental test started at 18 km·h−1 and progressed with increases of 0.9 km·h−1 for every 30 seconds completed. Performance was defined as time to exhaustion (TTE). Thirty seconds and 3 minutes after exhaustion, [La-] was assessed and the highest value was used as [La-peak]. The highest continuous VO2 during a 30-second period and the highest HR during a 5-second period were defined as VO2peak-DP and HRpeak-DP, respectively. The mean speed during the last 30 seconds before exhaustion was defined as the peak speed (speedpeak). Peak aerobic speed (sVO2peak) was calculated as the minimal speed requiring a VO2 equal to VO2peak from each individual’s relationship between submaximal O2 cost and treadmill speed.
Running Test
The running test was performed at a 6° incline and was similar in structure to the DP test. Briefly, the test started at 7.5 km·h−1 (∼60–70% of HRmax-RUN) and progressed with increments of 0.9 km·h−1 for each 5-minute step until the lactate threshold was exceeded (workload range: 7.5–12.9 km·h−1; ∼50–85% of VO2peak-RUN). The estimated lactate threshold was defined as the highest speed before the [La-] on the first workload + 1.5 mmol·L−1 was exceeded, which corresponds well with the maximal lactate steady-state workload in running.25 Cardiorespiratory variables were monitored during the last 2.5 minutes of each workload, and the average over the last 2 minutes was used for further analysis. After a 7-minute break including active recovery (∼35% of VO2peak-RUN), the incremental test started at 10 km·h−1 (∼70% of VO2peak-RUN) and progressed with increases of 0.5 km·h−1 for every 30 seconds completed until exhaustion. The highest continuous VO2 during a 60-second period was defined as VO2peak-RUN instead of VO2max, as it has been previously shown that XC skiers can reach 3%–4% higher values during diagonal skiing compared with running.11,27 The highest HR during a 5-second period was defined as HRpeak-RUN.
Training Data
Annual endurance training (May 1 to April 30) was recorded in training diaries and categorized into training modes (skating, classical, running, or other) and intensity zones based on the session-goal approach.28 In addition, the training times spent engaged in speed training and strength training were recorded. Unfortunately, only 3 of the 7 long-distance skiers recorded their training regularly, and their records were used in the comparison with the 6 all-round skiers. Due to the small sample size, no statistical analysis regarding the group comparison was performed.
Statistical Analysis
Group means and group differences are shown as mean (SD) and mean ± 95% confidence interval. The data were normally distributed as assessed by Shapiro–Wilk test. Group differences were analyzed with unpaired Student t tests and 2-factor mixed analysis of variance (group × speed on submaximal and group × exercise mode on peak values). If a significant group effect was found, a Bonferroni post hoc test for multiple comparisons was conducted. Moreover, analysis of covariance was conducted on the VO2peak values using age as a covariate. Effect sizes (ESs; Cohen d) and correlation coefficients (Pearson product–moment correlation) were classified according to Hopkins.22 The alpha level was set to .05 and P values between .05 and .10 were considered to indicate trends. IBM SPSS Statistics 24.0 (IBM Corp, New York, NY) was used for statistical analysis.
Results
Incremental Test to Exhaustion
There was a significant main effect of group on body-mass normalized VO2peak (F1,11 = 7.2, P = .02), with post hoc tests revealing 5.3 ± 5.8% (P = .07) and 6.4 ± 4.1% (P < .01) higher VO2peak-RUN and VO2peak-DP for all-round compared with long-distance skiers, respectively. When adjusted for age, there was still a significant group-difference of 6.5 ± 5.3% (F1,10 = 7.3, P = .02) in VO2peak-DP but no difference in VO2peak-RUN (difference: 4.8 ± 7.6%; F1,10 = 2.0, P = .19). No group differences were found for the ratio VO2peak-DP/VO2peak-RUN (0.92 [0.03] vs 0.91 [0.03] for all-round [range: 0.88–0.95] and long-distance skiers [range: 0.87–0.94], respectively; P = .48; ES: 0.41), TTE or the remaining cardiorespiratory variables (Table 2). A moderate negative correlation was found between VO2peak-RUN and the ratio VO2peak-DP/VO2peak-RUN (r = −.48; P = .09; n = 13). Age had a moderate negative correlation with VO2peak-RUN (r = −.35; P = .24; n = 13) and VO2peak-DP (r = −.40; P = .18; n = 13).
Performance and Physiological Response During Incremental Tests to Exhaustion in Running (6.0° Incline) and Double Poling (2.5° Incline)
Running | Double poling | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All-round skiers (n = 6) | Long-distance skiers (n = 7) | ES (Cohen d) | All-round skiers (n = 6) | Long-distance skiers (n = 7) | ES (Cohen d) | |
Time to exhaustion, s | 446 (24) | 423 (37) | 0.73M | 269 (20) | 268 (22) | 0.06T |
Speedpeak, km·h−1 | 16.7 (0.4) | 16.3 (0.6) | 0.73M | 25.2 (0.6) | 25.1 (0.6) | 0.06T |
Powerpeak, W | — | — | — | 353 (25) | 354 (18) | 0.05T |
VO2peak, mL·kg−1·min−1 | 85.0 (3.4)# | 80.6 (4.5) | 1.11M | 78.0 (2.5)* | 73.0 (2.7) | 1.90La |
VO2peak, L·min−1 | 6.38 (0.42) | 6.09 (0.44) | 0.67M | 5.86 (0.40) | 5.52 (0.32) | 0.92M |
sVO2peak, km·h−1 | 14.5 (0.5) | 14.1 (0.8) | 0.53S | 23.9 (1.9) | 23.8 (1.8) | 0.09T |
VEpeak, L·min−1 | 218 (13) | 217 (16) | 0.05T | 194 (10) | 198 (15) | 0.28S |
RERpeak | 1.14 (0.04) | 1.13 (0.02) | 0.65M | 1.06 (0.04) | 1.05 (0.03) | 0.09T |
HRpeak, beats·min−1 | 193 (4) | 189 (6) | 0.66M | 187 (6) | 185 (8) | 0.21S |
[Lapeak], mmol·L−1 | 8.9 (1.7) | 8.1 (1.1) | 0.61M | 7.3 (1.1) | 7.1 (1.5) | 0.16S |
Note: Data are presented as mean (SD). Abbreviations: ES, effect size; VO2peak, peak oxygen uptake; sVO2peak, the peak aerobic speed calculated from VO2peak and the submaximal relationship between treadmill speed and O2 cost; VEpeak, peak ventilation; RERpeak, peak respiratory exchange ratio; HRpeak, peak heart rate; [Lapeak], peak blood lactate concentration. Note: Superscript letters by the ESs denote their magnitude as T, trivial (ES < 0.2); S, small (0.2 ≤ ES < 0.6); M, moderate (0.6 ≤ ES < 1.2); and La, large (1.2 ≤ ES < 2.0).23 Speedpeak is the highest treadmill speed during the last 30 and 60 seconds for double poling and running, respectively.
*Significant difference between groups (P ≤ .01). #Tendency to difference between groups (.05 < P ≤ .1).
Submaximal Data
During submaximal DP (Table 3 and Figure 1), the O2 cost was on average 3.8 ± 3.6% (1.8 [1.7] mL·kg−1·min−1; F1,11 = 5.5, P = .04; ES: 1.13) lower for the long-distance skiers than all-round skiers, with post hoc tests revealing significant differences on the 3 highest workloads (16.2–19.8 km·h−1; P < .05) and tendencies on the 2 lowest workloads (10.8–12.6 km·h−1; .06 ≤ P ≤ .09). No differences were found for O2 cost as a percentage of VO2peak-DP (F1,11 = 0.7, P = .42), HR (F1,11 = 1.3, P = .28), [La-] (F1,11 = 0.2, P = .68), respiratory exchange ratio (F1,11 = 2.9, P = .12), breathing frequency (F1,11 = 0.2, P = .67), and ventilation (F1,11 = 0.5, P = .51). When the lactate threshold was estimated as the concentration at “warm-up” + 1.8 mmol·L−1 (2.7 [0.2] mmol·L−1, both groups), no significant difference was found for speed (19.2 [0.7] vs 19.5 [0.05] km·h−1; P = .51; ES: 0.40), VO2 (61.4 [2.4] vs 59.1 [2.0] mL·kg−1·min−1; P = .10; ES: 1.03), VO2 as a percent of VO2peak-DP (79 [3] vs 81 ± 5%; P = .32; ES: 0.56), or HR (163 [7] vs 167 [6] beats min−1; P = .34; ES: 0.56) between all-round and long-distance skiers, respectively.
Physiological and Kinematic Responses to Double Poling at the Highest Submaximal Speed Before Exceeding Estimated Lactate Threshold (2.5° Incline and 18 km·h−1) in All-Round and Long-Distance Skiers
All-round skiers | Long-distance skiers | ES (Cohen d) | |
---|---|---|---|
Power output, W | 252.3 (17.4) | 253.7 (16.3) | 0.08T |
VO2, mL·kg−1·min−1 | 56.3 (1.3)* | 54.0 (2.1) | 1.28La |
VO2, % of VO2peak-DP | 72.3 (3.6) | 74.2 (5.5) | 0.41S |
VE, L·min−1 | 112 (17) | 121 (18) | 0.56S |
RER | 0.90 (0.02) | 0.92 (0.02) | 0.74M |
HR, beats·min−1 | 156 (8.1) | 159 (7) | 0.46S |
HR, % of HRpeak-DP | 83.2 (3.5) | 85.9 (2.8) | 0.84M |
[La-], mmol·L−1 | 1.9 (0.7) | 1.7 (0.4) | 0.37S |
Cycle time, ms | 1168 (145) | 1169 (78) | 0.01T |
Poling time, ms | 360 (15) | 373 (22) | 0.67M |
Poling time, % of cycle | 31 (3) | 32 (2) | 0.36S |
Reposition time, ms | 807 (134) | 796 (68) | 0.12T |
Reposition time, % of cycle | 69 (3) | 68 (2) | 0.36S |
Cycle length, m | 5.8 (0.7) | 5.8 (0.4) | 0.01T |
ROM ankle, ° | 15.3 (6.0) | 15.5 (4.1) | 0.03T |
ROM knee, ° | 33.6 (8.0) | 30.7 (3.0) | 0.51S |
ROM hip, ° | 86.8 (4.8) | 86.9 (3.6) | 0.03T |
ROM shoulder, ° | 97.6 (7.9) | 89.7 (8.4) | 0.96M |
ROM elbow, ° | 95.7 (9.2) | 103.4 (12.2) | 0.70M |
zCOM displacement, cm | 25.6 (1.4) | 26.7 (2.6) | 0.50S |
Note: Data are presented as mean (SD). Abbreviations: [La-], blood lactate concentration; ES, effect size; HR, heart rate; HRpeak-DP, peak heart rate in double poling; RER, respiratory exchange ratio; ROM, range of motion; VE, ventilation; VO2, oxygen uptake; VO2peak-DP, VO2 in double poling; zCOM, vertical center of mass. Superscript letters by the ESs denote their magnitude as T, trivial (ES < 0.2); S, small (0.2 ≤ ES < 0.6); M, moderate (0.6 ≤ ES < 1.2); La, large (1.2 ≤ ES < 2.0); and VL, very large (ES ≥ 2.0).23 *Significant difference between groups (P < .05). #Tendency to difference between groups (.05 < P ≤ .1).
The correlations between O2 cost (grand mean) in DP and age, performance (TTE) and the training hours spent in classical skiing were moderate (r = −.37; P = .21; n = 13), high (r = −.50; P = .08; n = 13), and very high (r = −.82; P < .01; n = 9), respectively.
During submaximal running (Figure 1), no group differences were found for any of the cardiorespiratory variables (F1,11 = 0.01–1.3, P = .28–.91). The correlations between O2 cost in running and age and performance (TTE) were moderate (r = .32; P = .29; n = 13) and high (r = −.60; P = .03; n = 13), respectively.
DP Technique
Neither cycle time (F1,11 = 0.03, P = .86), poling time (F1,11 = 0.5, P = .52), reposition time (F1,11 = 0.2, P = .71), nor cycle length (F1,11 = 0.02, P = .88) differed between groups on the submaximal workloads (Figure 2). At the submaximal speed of 18 km·h−1 (the highest speed at which all subjects were below the estimated lactate threshold), the joint angles and zCOM were analyzed and are shown in Figure 3. No differences were found for zCOM; range of motion (ROM) of joint angles (Table 3); or the specific angles during the cycle for the ankle, knee, shoulder, and elbow (Figure 3). However, for the long-distance skiers, the hip was more flexed for 27% to 41% of the cycle (P < .05), and zCOM tended to be lower for 28% to 35% of the cycle (P ≤ .10) compared with the all-round skiers.
Training Data
The annual endurance, speed, and strength training are reported in Table 4. Due to the low sample size of long-distance skiers, no statistical analysis was conducted to compare groups. Compared with the all-round skiers, the long-distance skiers trained 47 ± 67% (mean ± 95% confidence interval) more classical skiing (255 [25] h vs 376 [74] h) and 64 ± 18% less skating (255 [44] h vs 92 [11] h). However, the groups performed similar amounts of running (196 [41] h vs 187 [48] h) and other endurance training modes (61 [44] h vs 40 [22] h; for percentage distributions, see Figure 4).
Annual Training (12 Months) for the All-Round and Long-Distance Cross-Country Skiers
All-round skiers (n = 6) | Long-distance skiers (n = 3) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Total training, h | % of total training | Total training, h | % of total training | |
LIT (<81% of HRmax) | 684 (72) | 83.1 (3.3) | 642 (97) | 83.0 (1.8) |
MIT (82–87% of HRmax) | 37 (11) | 4.5 (1.2) | 24 (8) | 3.0 (1.7) |
HIT (>88% of HRmax) | 32 (10) | 3.9 (1.1) | 43 (17) | 5.5 (1.7) |
Strength | 58 (29) | 7.0 (3.1) | 52 (11) | 6.7 (0.5) |
Speed | 13 (9) | 1.5 (1.1) | 14 (8) | 1.8 (0.9) |
Total training | 824 (89) | 775 (130) |
Note: Data are presented as mean (SD). Abbreviations: HIT, high-intensity training; HRmax, maximum heart rate; LIT, low-intensity training; MIT, moderate-intensity training. Note: Due to the low number of long-distance skiers reporting their training, no statistical analysis was run. The data are merely meant to indicate trends and should be interpreted with caution.
Discussion
The present study provides novel information about the requirements for success in elite long-distance XC skiing: (1) low O2 cost in DP may be the key to why these skiers succeed at the longest competition durations, even though they displayed a lower VO2peak as compared with elite all-round skiers; (2) elite long-distance skiers are characterized by a VO2peak in running of about 80 mL·kg−1·min−1, with ∼90% or more being utilized in DP specifically; and (3) the ratio between VO2peak in DP and running was equal for the 2 groups, even though the long-distance skiers trained more using classical skiing in which the DP technique is heavily used.
Interestingly, the long-distance skiers displayed ∼5% to 6% lower VO2peak-RUN and VO2peak-DP than the elite all-round skiers. This could potentially be explained by several factors, including a higher standard of competitors in the WC compared with the Ski Classics, age-related differences, or different physiological demands due to competition duration. In support of the latter, WC distance and Ski Classics events were on average ∼19 km (excluding Sprint events) and ∼59 km, respectively, in the season in which the athletes were tested. Hence, as exercise economy and fractional utilization of VO2peak are known to be increasingly important with prolonged competition duration,29 it could be argued that the reduced submaximal O2 cost and similar lactate threshold as a function of speed may be of even greater importance for the long-distance skiers than an extremely high VO2peak. Moreover, the long-distance skiers were on average ∼6.5 years older than the all-round skiers, and it has been previously shown that VO2peak can decline by approximately ∼5% to 10% per decade after ∼25 years of age, even in trained subjects.30,31 Also, a moderate negative correlation was found between age and both VO2peak-RUN and VO2peak-DP, and several of the oldest long-distance skiers reported verbally that their VO2peak-RUN had been higher at around 25 years of age. Therefore, we included age as a covariate in the statistical analysis comparing VO2peak between groups. The adjustments for age changed the mean difference only slightly but caused a pronounced widening of the confidence intervals. Hence, this adjustment erased the statistical difference between groups only for VO2peak-RUN and not for VO2peak-DP. Therefore, only some of the difference in aerobic power may reflect an effect of aging (or change in training over the years), and the difference must be explained by additional factors such as differences in physiological demands due to race lengths or the standard of the athletes competing in the different race formats.
Our data contradicts the recent findings of Sagelv et al32 who found equal, if not slightly higher (ns), VO2peak both in DP and diagonal skiing when comparing long-distance skiers to all-round skiers. However, this study only included national-class all-round skiers with mean FIS points of 121 compared with 16 in this study using elite all-round skiers. Hence, we conclude that all-round skiers have slightly higher VO2peak values when both groups are recruited from the highest performance level.
Previously, it has been emphasized that the ability to achieve high VO2peak/VO2max ratios in the various skiing techniques is of great importance for sport-specific performance,5,18 and it has been indicated that these ratios may be improved through increased specificity in training.18 Hence, it was appealing to hypothesize that the long-distance skiers would have a higher ratio of VO2peak-DP/VO2peak-RUN than the all-round skiers. However, even though there was a difference in training-mode distribution between groups, at least based on the few athletes reporting their training, both groups showed a ratio of ∼0.91 to 0.92, comparable to the values found when comparing national class all-round skiers to elite long-distance skiers32 and to other studies investigating XC skiers at various performance levels.10–12 Moreover, there was a moderate negative correlation between VO2peak-RUN and the ratio VO2peak-DP/VO2peak-RUN. The reason for this is unclear and needs further elucidation. However, the findings may support the idea that DP includes too small a muscle mass to reach VO2peak-RUN/VO2max irrespective of training status or that the lower vascular conductance17 and O2 extraction16 in the upper body compared with the lower body muscles are at least not smaller in those skiers possessing the highest aerobic power.
The high correlation found between performance (TTE) and O2 cost in DP is in agreement with previous research.33,34 Similar to previous findings,32 a large difference was found in DP O2 cost between groups, even though they showed almost identical cycle times, poling times, and movement patterns, as indicated by the joint angles and zCOM. The only technical difference observed was a lower hip angle, which caused zCOM to be slightly lower in the late poling phase for the long-distance skiers. Speculatively, some of the potential energy of elevated body mass that was released by the vertical downward movement of zCOM may have been transferred to the poles at a later part of the poling phase, characterized by a more optimal pole angle. However, without any measurement of pole-force, this is only a speculation, and we do not know if this has contributed to the observed difference in O2 cost. A limitation of this study is the low sample size, and it is possible that more kinematic differences could have been detected if we had been able to recruit more subjects. Hence, due to low statistical power, we cannot exclude undiscovered kinematic differences as a potential explanation for the observed difference in O2 cost.
Previously, a 4% to 5% lower O2 cost was found in a group of elite senior XC skiers compared with their junior counterparts.35 Plausible explanations could therefore be that greater age, or more likely, a larger accumulated training volume over several years may have contributed to the findings. In support, we observed a very high negative correlation between O2 cost in DP and the annual training hours spent during classical skiing. Also, it has previously been found that XC skiers reduce their O2 cost of skiing toward the competition season in parallel with an increased amount of ski-specific training.36 Hence, more DP-specific training during the past years leading up to this investigation may have improved exercise economy without changing the “outward” movement-pattern, potentially through mechanisms not investigated in the present study (eg, fiber-type distribution, mitochondrial efficiency, and muscle-activation patterns).
Based on the few athletes reporting their training, the long-distance skiers trained more classical skiing and less skating, which is not surprising considering the events they compete in. However, due to the small number of subjects, interpretation should be done with caution and future studies should characterize the long-distance skiers’ training in more detail using a larger sample (examining factors such as distribution, intensity, and length of training sessions).
The [La-] during the submaximal workloads and the estimated lactate threshold were similar, even though each submaximal workload represented a somewhat higher percentage of VO2peak-DP for the long-distance compared with the all-round skiers. This, together with the reduced submaximal O2 cost, resulted in equal sVO2peak (Table 2) and equal DP performances in a short performance test, despite the lower VO2peak. Hence, as exercise economy and the lactate threshold become increasingly important with prolonged competition duration,29 these adaptations may be of major importance for long-distance skiers’ sport-specific outcomes. Moreover, improved exercise economy favors reduced energy utilization, potentially reducing the need for energy intake and use of muscle glycogen. Future studies should investigate whether these characteristics result in superior performance for long-distance skiers with prolonged test or competition durations.
Practical Applications
The present study provides valuable information regarding physiological capacities in elite long-distance skiers; a VO2peak in DP of 70 to 75 mL·kg−1·min−1 combined with an efficient exercise economy seems crucial to reach an elite performance level. In addition, the training data and communication with the best long-distance skiers indicate that a large amount of DP-specific training is crucial to improve the endurance of the upper-body muscles that may be necessary to maintain an efficient technique and high skiing speeds over several hours. In practice, this may be achieved through long training sessions mainly using the DP technique combined with sessions of upper-body core and strength training.
Conclusions
In the present investigation, the long-distance skiers were found to have a reduced O2 cost but lower VO2peak compared with all-round skiers, ultimately leading to a similar DP performance in short performance tests. The present study challenges the idea that the ratio between VO2peak in DP and running can be improved through increased specificity in training.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the athletes for their participation in the study. Special thanks are also given to Camilla Høivik Carlsen and Øyvind Gløersen for help with data analysis.
References
- 1.↑
Maldonado S, Mujika I, Padilla S. Influence of body mass and height on the energy cost of running in highly trained middle- and long-distance runners. Int J Sports Med. 2002;23:268–272. PubMed ID: 12015627 doi:10.1055/s-2002-29083
- 2.↑
Padilla S, Mujika I, Cuesta G, Goiriena JJ. Level ground and uphill cycling ability in professional road cycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999;31:878–885. PubMed ID: 10378916 doi:10.1097/00005768-199906000-00017
- 3.↑
Impellizzeri FM, Ebert T, Sassi A, Menaspa P, Rampinini E, Martin DT. Level ground and uphill cycling ability in elite female mountain bikers and road cyclists. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008;102:335–341. PubMed ID: 17943306 doi:10.1007/s00421-007-0590-9
- 4.↑
Losnegard T, Hallén J. Physiological differences between sprint- and distance-specialized cross-country skiers. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014;9:25–31. PubMed ID: 24155024 doi:10.1123/ijspp.2013-0066
- 5.↑
Sandbakk Ø, Holmberg HC. Physiological capacity and training routines of elite cross-country skiers: approaching the upper limits of human endurance. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12:1003–1011. PubMed ID: 28095083 doi:10.1123/ijspp.2016-0749
- 6.↑
Stöggl TL, Holmberg HC. Double-poling biomechanics of elite cross-country skiers: flat versus uphill terrain. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48:1580–1589. doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000000943
- 7.↑
Lindinger SJ, Holmberg HC. How do elite cross-country skiers adapt to different double poling frequencies at low to high speeds? Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011;111:1103–1119. PubMed ID: 21113613 doi:10.1007/s00421-010-1736-8
- 8.↑
Zoppirolli C, Pellegrini B, Bortolan L, Schena F. Energetics and biomechanics of double poling in regional and high-level cross-country skiers. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2015;115:969–979. PubMed ID: 25515019 doi:10.1007/s00421-014-3078-4
- 9.↑
Zoppirolli C, Bortolan L, Stella F, et al. Following a long-distance classical race the whole-body kinematics of double poling by elite cross-country skiers are altered. Front Physiol. 2018;9:978. PubMed ID: 30090070 doi:10.3389/fphys.2018.00978
- 10.↑
Skattebo Ø, Hallen J, Rønnestad BR, Losnegard T. Upper body heavy strength training does not affect performance in junior female cross-country skiers. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016;26:1007–1016. PubMed ID: 26146761 doi:10.1111/sms.12517
- 11.↑
Holmberg HC, Rosdahl H, Svedenhag J. Lung function, arterial saturation and oxygen uptake in elite cross country skiers: influence of exercise mode. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2007;17:437–444. PubMed ID: 17040487
- 12.↑
Björklund G, Stöggl T, Holmberg HC. Biomechanically influenced differences in O2 extraction in diagonal skiing: arm versus leg. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42:1899–1908. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181da4339
- 13.↑
Ørtenblad N, Nielsen J, Boushel R, Söderlund K, Saltin B, Holmberg HC. The muscle fiber profiles, mitochondrial content, and enzyme activities of the exceptionally well-trained arm and leg muscles of elite cross-country skiers. Front Physiol. 2018;9:1031. PubMed ID: 30116201 doi:10.3389/fphys.2018.01031
- 14.↑
Van Hall G, Jensen-Urstad M, Rosdahl H, Holmberg HC, Saltin B, Calbet JA. Leg and arm lactate and substrate kinetics during exercise. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2003;284:E193–E205. PubMed ID: 12388120 doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00273.2002
- 15.
Mygind E. Fibre characteristics and enzyme levels of arm and leg muscles in elite cross-country skiers. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1995;5:76–80. PubMed ID: 7606514 doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.1995.tb00016.x
- 16.↑
Calbet JA, Holmberg HC, Rosdahl H, van Hall G, Jensen-Urstad M, Saltin B. Why do arms extract less oxygen than legs during exercise? Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2005;289:R1448–R1458. PubMed ID: 15919729 doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00824.2004
- 17.↑
Calbet JA, Jensen-Urstad M, van Hall G, Holmberg HC, Rosdahl H, Saltin B. Maximal muscular vascular conductances during whole body upright exercise in humans. J Physiol. 2004;558:319–331. PubMed ID: 15121799 doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2003.059287
- 18.↑
Holmberg HC. The elite cross-country skier provides unique insights into human exercise physiology. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;25(suppl 4):100–109. doi:10.1111/sms.12601
- 19.↑
Foss Ø, Hallén J. Validity and stability of a computerized metabolic system with mixing chamber. Int J Sports Med. 2005;26:569–575. PubMed ID: 16195991 doi:10.1055/s-2004-821317
- 20.↑
Sandbakk Ø, Hegge AM, Losnegard T, Skattebo Ø, Tønnessen E, Holmberg HC. The physiological capacity of the world’s highest ranked female cross-country skiers. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48:1091–1100. PubMed ID: 26741124 doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000000862
- 21.↑
Hoffman MD, Clifford PS, Bota B, Mandli M, Jones GM. Influence of body mass on energy cost of roller skiing. Int J Sport Biomech. 1990;6:374–385. doi:10.1123/ijsb.6.4.374
- 22.↑
Losnegard T, Myklebust H, Skattebo Ø, Stadheim HK, Sandbakk Ø, Hallén J. The influence of pole length on performance, O2 cost, and kinematics in double poling. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2016;12:211–217. PubMed ID: 27193356 doi:10.1123/ijspp.2015-0754
- 23.↑
Hopkins WG, Marshall SW, Batterham AM, Hanin J. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41:3–13. PubMed ID: 19092709 doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818cb278
- 24.↑
Myklebust H, Losnegard T, Hallen J. Differences in V1 and V2 ski skating techniques described by accelerometers. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013;24:882–893. PubMed ID: 23957331 doi:10.1111/sms.12106
- 25.↑
Wisløff U, Helgerud J. Methods for evaluating peak oxygen uptake and anaerobic threshold in upper body of cross-country skiers. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30:963–970. PubMed ID: 9624659
- 26.↑
Helgerud J, Ingjer F, Strømme SB. Sex differences in performance-matched marathon runners. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1990;61:433–439. PubMed ID: 2079063 doi:10.1007/BF00236064
- 27.↑
Strømme SB, Ingjer F, Meen HD. Assessment of maximal aerobic power in specifically trained athletes. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1977;42:833–837. PubMed ID: 881383 doi:10.1152/jappl.1977.42.6.833
- 28.↑
Seiler KS, Kjerland GO. Quantifying training intensity distribution in elite endurance athletes: is there evidence for an “optimal” distribution? Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2006;16:49–56. PubMed ID: 16430681 doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2004.00418.x
- 29.↑
Bassett DR Jr, Howley ET. Limiting factors for maximum oxygen uptake and determinants of endurance performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32:70–84. PubMed ID: 10647532 doi:10.1097/00005768-200001000-00012
- 30.↑
Åstrand I, Åstrand PO, Hallback I, Kilbom A. Reduction in maximal oxygen uptake with age. J Appl Physiol. 1973;35:649–654. PubMed ID: 4770349 doi:10.1152/jappl.1973.35.5.649
- 31.↑
Ogawa T, Spina RJ, Martin WH 3rd, et al. Effects of aging, sex, and physical training on cardiovascular responses to exercise. Circulation. 1992;86:494–503. PubMed ID: 1638717 doi:10.1161/01.CIR.86.2.494
- 32.↑
Sagelv EH, Engseth TP, Pedersen S, et al. Physiological comparisons of elite male visma ski classics and national level cross-country skiers during uphill treadmill roller skiing. Front Physiol. 2018;9:1523. PubMed ID: 30505276 doi:10.3389/fphys.2018.01523
- 33.↑
Sandbakk Ø, Holmberg HC, Leirdal S, Ettema G. Metabolic rate and gross efficiency at high work rates in world class and national level sprint skiers. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010;109:473–481. PubMed ID: 20151149 doi:10.1007/s00421-010-1372-3
- 34.↑
Sandbakk Ø, Hegge AM, Ettema G. The role of incline, performance level, and gender on the gross mechanical efficiency of roller ski skating. Front Physiol. 2013;4:293. PubMed ID: 24155722 doi:10.3389/fphys.2013.00293
- 35.↑
Ainegren M, Carlsson P, Tinnsten M, Laaksonen MS. Skiing economy and efficiency in recreational and elite cross-country skiers. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27:1239–1252. PubMed ID: 22344058 doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e31824f206c
- 36.↑
Losnegard T, Myklebust H, Spencer M, Hallén J. Seasonal variations in VO2max, O2-cost, O2-deficit, and performance in elite cross-country skiers. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27:1780–1790. PubMed ID: 22996025 doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e31827368f6