Spatiotemporal Gait Patterns During Overt and Covert Evaluation in Patients With Parkinson’s Disease and Healthy Subjects: Is There a Hawthorne Effect?

in Journal of Applied Biomechanics
View More View Less
  • 1 Universidade da Coruña
  • 2 Institute of Biomedical Research of A Coruña;
  • 3 Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $24.95

Student 1 year online subscription

USD  $88.00

1 year online subscription

USD  $118.00

Student 2 year online subscription

USD  $168.00

2 year online subscription

USD  $224.00

Parkinson’s disease (PD) and aging lead to gait impairments. Some of the disturbances of gait are focused on step length, cadence, and temporal variability of gait cycle. Under experimental conditions gait can be overtly evaluated, but patients with PD are prone to expectancy effects; thus it seems relevant to determine if such evaluation truly reflects the spontaneous gait pattern in such patients, and also in healthy subjects. Thirty subjects (15 subjects with PD and 15 healthy control subjects) were asked to walk using their natural, preferred gait pattern. In half of the trials subjects were made aware that they were being evaluated (overt evaluation), while in the rest of the trials the evaluation was performed covertly (covert evaluation). During covert evaluation the gait pattern was modified in all groups. Gait speed was significantly increased (P = .022); step cadence and average step length were also significantly modified, the average step length increased (P = .002) and the cadence was reduced (P ≤ .001). Stride cycle time variability was unchanged significantly (P = .084). These changes were not significantly different compared between elderly and young healthy controls either. Due to the small sample size, a note of caution is in order; however, the significant results suggest that covert evaluation of gait might be considered to complement experimental evaluations of gait.

Verónica Robles-García, Yoanna Corral-Bergantiños, Nelson Espinosa, Javier Cudeiro, and Pablo Arias are with the Neuroscience and Motor Control Group (NEUROcom), Faculty of Health Science, Faculty of Physiotherapy, and INEF-Galicia, Universidade da Coruña, Spain; and the Institute of Biomedical Research of A Coruña, Spain. María Amalia Jácome is with the MODES Research Group, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Universidade da Coruña, Spain. Carlos García-Sancho is with the Department of Neurology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña, Spain.

Address author correspondence to Pablo Arias at