Muscle Activity Patterns do not Differ Between Push-Up and Bench Press Exercises

in Journal of Applied Biomechanics
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD $24.95

Student 1 year subscription

USD $87.00

1 year subscription

USD $116.00

Student 2 year subscription

USD $165.00

2 year subscription

USD $215.00

Popular topics for upper-body resistance training involve the differences between hand positions, open versus closed chain exercises, and movement variations for the novice to the advanced. It was hypothesized that there will be no difference between closed (push-up) versus open (bench press) chain exercises for the primary muscle group activity nor would there be a difference between push-ups on the toes versus knees with respect to the percent contribution of each muscle. Surface muscle activity was measured for 8 upper-body and core muscles during a sequence of push-up and bench press variations with a normalized weight for 12 active men. Each participant completed push-ups and bench press exercises at each of 3 hand positions. The results demonstrated that there were few differences between closed versus open chain exercises for the primary muscle groups with the exception of core activation. In addition, in general, narrow hand positions yielded greater activation, and there were no significant differences between push-ups on the toes versus knees with respect to the percent contribution for the primary muscle groups. In conclusion, closed chain exercises may be preferred for functional training, and knee push-ups may be ideal as a novice push-up variation.

Gottschall and Becker are with the Department of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA. Hastings is with Medical and Health Sciences, AUT University Auckland, Auckland, NZ.

Gottschall (jinger@psu.edu) is corresponding author.
Journal of Applied Biomechanics
Article Sections
References
  • 1.

    Cogley RMArchambault TAFibeger JFKoverman MMYoudas JWHollman JH. Comparison of muscle activation using various hand positions during the push-up exercise. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19(3):628633. PubMed ID: 16095413 doi:10.1519/15094.1

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Youdas JWBudach BDEllerbusch JVStucky CMWait KRHollman JH. Comparison of muscle-activation patterns during the conventional push-up and perfect· pushupTM exercises. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(12):33523362. PubMed ID: 20664364 doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cc23b0

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Brickey GD. The Effect of Hand Positioning on Maximum Push-Up Performance in Adults. El Paso: ETD Collection for University of Texas; 2008. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.utep.edu/dissertations/AAI1461141/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Anning JMueller SWilly D. Pilot Study: the influence of grip width on barbell displacement and shoulder range of motion when performing the bench press. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25:1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Suprak DNDawes JStephenson MD. The effect of position on the percentage of body mass supported during traditional and modified push-up variants. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(2):497503. PubMed ID: 20179649 doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181bde2cf

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Sandhu JSMahajan SShenoy S. An electromyographic analysis of shoulder muscle activation during push-up variations on stable and labile surfaces. Int J Shoulder Surg. 2008;2(2):30. PubMed ID: 20300308 doi:10.4103/0973-6042.40456

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Herrington LWaterman RSmith L. Electromyographic analysis of shoulder muscles during press-up variations and progressions. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2015;25(1):100106. PubMed ID: 25455253 doi:10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.10.002

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Cram JRKasman GS. Electrode placement. In: JR CramGS KasmanJ Holz eds. Introduction to Surface Electromyography. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen; 1998:371375.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Calatayud JBorreani SColado JCMartin FRogers ME. Muscle activity levels in upper-body push exercises with different loads and stability conditions. Phys Sportsmed. 2014;42(4):106119. PubMed ID: 25419894 doi:10.3810/psm.2014.11.2097

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Calatayud JBorreani SColado JCMartin FTella VAndersen LL. Bench press and push-up at comparable levels of muscle activity results in similar strength gains. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29(1):246253. PubMed ID: 24983847 doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000000589

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Glass SCArmstrong T. Electromyographical activity of the pectoralis muscle during incline and decline bench presses. J Strength Cond Res. 1997;11(3):163167.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    San Juan JGSuprak DNRoach SMLyda M. The effects of exercise type and elbow angle on vertical ground reaction force and muscle activity during a push-up plus exercise. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16(1):23. PubMed ID: 25881172 doi:10.1186/s12891-015-0486-5

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Wattanaprakornkul DHalaki MCathers IGinn KA. Direction-specific recruitment of rotator cuff muscles during bench press and row. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2012;21(6):10411049. PubMed ID: 21978788 doi:10.1016/j.jelekin.2011.09.002

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Lee SLee DPark J. The effects of changes in hand position on the electromyographic activities of the shoulder stabilizer muscles during push-up plus exercises on unstable surfaces. J Phys Ther Sci. 2013;25(1):125128. doi:10.1589/jpts.25.125

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Seo SHJeon IHCho YHLee HGHwang YTJang JH. Surface EMG during the push-up plus exercise on a stable support or Swiss ball: scapular stabilizer muscle exercise. J Phys Ther Sci. 2013;25(7):833837. PubMed ID: 24259864 doi:10.1589/jpts.25.833

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Yoon JGLee HY. Periscapular muscle activities and kinematic analysis of the performed on different supporting surfaces for the lower limbs push-up plus exercise. J Phys Ther Sci. 2013;25(3):259262. doi:10.1589/jpts.25.259

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Anderson GSGaetz MHolzmann MTwist P. Comparison of EMG activity during stable and unstable push-up protocols. Eur J Sport Sci. 2013;13(1):4248. doi:10.1080/17461391.2011.577240

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Contreras BSchoenfeld BMike JTiryaki-Sonmez GCronin JVaino E. The biomechanics of the push-up: implications for resistance training programs. Strength Cond J. 2012;34(5):4146. doi:10.1519/SSC.0b013e31826d877b

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Article Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 192 192 55
Full Text Views 7 7 2
PDF Downloads 0 0 0
Altmetric Badge
PubMed
Google Scholar