Goal Setting in Sport and Exercise: A Research Synthesis to Resolve the Controversy

in Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD $24.95

Student 1 year subscription

USD $84.00

1 year subscription

USD $111.00

Student 2 year subscription

USD $159.00

2 year subscription

USD $208.00

Although the motivational technique of goal setting has consistently and reliably improved performance in industrial psychology research, this beneficial effect has not been clearly demonstrated in the sport domain. The many proposed explanations for this discrepancy have resulted in a controversy in the literature. However, scientists have overlooked the importance of statistical power. A meta-analytic review of the literature investigating the effects of goal setting on performance in sport and exercise could help to clarify the state of knowledge. The meta-analytic procedures described by Hedges and Olkin (1985) were used to statistically combine 36 studies identified as meeting inclusion criteria. Results indicate that, overall, setting goals improves sport by 0.34 of a standard deviation. Moderate, absolute, and combined short- and long-term goals were associated with the greatest effects. Additional moderator variables were identified, and the extent to which they alter the goal setting–performance relationship is discussed.

L. Blaine Kyllo and Daniel M. Landers are with the Department of Exercise Science and Physical Education at Arizona State University, Box 870404, Tempe, AZ 85287-0404. Request reprints from D.M. Landers.

Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology

Article Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 34 34 34
Full Text Views 1 1 1
PDF Downloads 2 2 2

Altmetric Badge

PubMed

Google Scholar