Nonverbal Communication of Confidence in Soccer Referees: An Experimental Test of Darwin’s Leakage Hypothesis

in Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD $24.95

Student 1 year subscription

USD $84.00

1 year subscription

USD $111.00

Student 2 year subscription

USD $159.00

2 year subscription

USD $208.00

The goal of the present paper was to investigate whether soccer referees’ nonverbal behavior (NVB) differed based on the difficulty of their decisions and whether perceivers could detect these systematic variations. On the one hand, communicating confidence via NVB is emphasized in referee training. On the other hand, it seems feasible from a theoretical point of view that particularly following relatively difficult decisions referees have problems controlling their NVB. We conducted three experiments to investigate this question. Experiment 1 (N = 40) and Experiment 2 (N = 60) provided evidence that perceivers regard referees’ NVB as less confident following ambiguous decisions as compared with following unambiguous decisions. Experiment 3 (N = 58) suggested that perceivers were more likely to debate with the referee when referees nonverbally communicated less confidence. We discuss consequences for referee training.

Philip Furley is with the Institute of Cognitive and Team/Racket Sport Research, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany. Geoffrey Schweizer is with the Department of Sport and Exercise Psychology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Address author correspondence to Philip Furley at p.furley@dshs-koeln.de.
Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology

Article Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 10 10 10
Full Text Views 1 1 1
PDF Downloads 1 1 1

Altmetric Badge

PubMed

Google Scholar