The Economic Impact of the Olympic Games: Ex Ante Predictions and Ex Poste Reality

in Journal of Sport Management
View More View Less
  • 1 University of South Florida
  • | 2 Miami University
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $24.95

Student 1 year online subscription

USD  $87.00

1 year online subscription

USD  $116.00

Student 2 year online subscription

USD  $166.00

2 year online subscription

USD  $221.00

This article uses data from the 1996 Summer Olympic Games and the 2002 Olympic Winter Games to test the predictions of regional input-output models. Real changes associated with these events are insignificant. Nominal measures of demand overstate demand increases and factor price increases absorb the impact of real increases in demand. Nominal changes appear to be limited to hotel prices. Input-output models of a regional economy are often used to predict the impact of short-duration sporting events. Because I-O models assume constant factor prices and technical coefficients between sectors are calibrated from long-run steady-state relations in the regional economy, the predictions greatly overstate the true impact. Because the predictions of these models are increasingly used to justify public subsidies, understanding these deficiencies is crucial.

Porter is with the Dept. of Economics, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620-5500. Fletcher is with the Dept. of Economics, Richard T. Farmer School of Business, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 2996 1055 53
Full Text Views 203 75 5
PDF Downloads 206 67 7