Recruiting, Evaluating, and Retaining Kinesiology Faculty Members

in Kinesiology Review
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $24.95

Student 1 year subscription

USD  $41.00

1 year subscription

USD  $54.00

Student 2 year subscription

USD  $77.00

2 year subscription

USD  $101.00

This paper offers direction and guidance to help departments develop fair and equitable search, evaluation, and retention strategies for their faculty. Included is how to attract a diverse candidate pool and successfully recruit diverse candidates. In addition, the paper provides guidelines about evaluating faculty members, emphasizing the need for formative evaluation that offers faculty ample opportunities, resources, and support systems for improving their performance before any summative evaluations administered by a department or college. Finally, the paper presents retention stratagems as guidelines to help departments support and retain their high-quality faculty members. Achieving the goals of recruitment, retention, and advancement requires the involvement and leadership of university officers, school deans, department chairs/heads, and faculty.

Rizzo is with California State University, San Bernardino, San Bernardino, CA. McCullagh is with California State University, East Bay, Hayward, CA. Pastore is with The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.

Rizzo (trizzo@csusb.edu) is corresponding author.
  • American Kinesiology Association. (n.d.). Kinesiology on the move: One of the fastest growing (but often misunderstand) majors in academia. Kinesiology Today. http://americankinesiology.org/Content/Documents/Position%20Statement_1.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed. pp. 202–205). Washington, DC: Author.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • American Sociological Association Style Guide. (2010). Quick tips for ASA style (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Anderson, D.J. (2011). Careers in higher education. In S. Hoffman (Ed.), Careers in sports, fitness, and exercise: The authoritative guide for landing a job of your dreams (pp. 139–155). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Baldwin, R.G., & Chang, D.A. (2006). Reinforcing our ‘keystone’ faculty. Liberal Education, 92(4), 28–35.

  • Bernstein, S., & Kezar, A. (2016, June 28). Is it time to eliminate tenure for professors? The Conversation.

  • Bittner, N.P., & O’Connor, M. (2012). Focus on retention: Identifying barriers to nurse faculty satisfaction. Nursing Education Perspectives, 33(4), 251–254. doi:10.5480/1536-5026-33.4.251

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Canale, A.M., Herdklotz, C., & Wild, L. (2013, October 23). Mid-career faculty support: The middle years of the academic profession. Faculty Career Development Services. Retrieved from https://www.rit.edu/academicaffairs/facultydevelopment/sites/rit.edu.academicaffairs.facultydevelopment/files/images/FCDS_Mid-CareerRpt.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DeAngelis, T. (2008). Recruiting and retaining great faculty: Experts share tips on attracting the best people for the job. Monitor on Psychology, 39(4), 60. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/monitor/2008/04/faculty

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dornier, L. (2009). Faculty evaluation: Points to ponder. Kinesiology Today, 2(4), 13–15.

  • Flaherty, C. (2013, June 17). Working way past 65. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/06/17/data-suggest-baby-boomer-faculty-are-putting-retirement

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Flaherty, C. (2015, June 10). Flawed evaluations. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/06/10/aaup-committee-survey-data-raise-questions-effectiveness-student-teaching

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Foote, K.E., & Solem, M.N. (2009). Toward better mentoring for early career faculty: Results of a study of US geographers. International Journal for Academic Development, 14(1), 47–58. doi:10.1080/13601440802659403

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gasman, M., Kim, J., & Nguyen, T-H. (2011). Effectively recruiting faculty of color at highly selective institutions: A School of Education case study. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 4(4), 212–222. doi:10.1037/a0025130

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jaeger, A.J., & Thornton, C.H. (2006). Neither honor nor compensation: Faculty and public service. Educational Policy, 20, 345–366. doi:10.1177/0895904805284050

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Johnsrud, L.K. (2002). Measuring the quality of faculty and administrative worklife: Implications for college and university campuses. Research in Higher Education, 43(3), 379–395. doi:10.1023/A:1014845218989 doi:10.1023/A:1014845218989

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kelly, B.T., Gayles, J.G., & Williams, C.D. (2017). Recruitment without retention: A critical case of Black faculty unrest. Journal of Negro Education, 86(3), 305–317. doi:10.7709/jnegroeducation.86.3.0305

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kretchmar, R.S. (2008). The utility of silos and bunkers in the evolution of kinesiology. Quest, 60(1), 3–12. doi:10.1080/00336297.2008.10483564

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lawrence, J.H., Celis, S., Kim, H.S., Lipson, S.K., & Tong, X. (2014). To stay or not to stay: Retention of Asian international faculty in STEM fields. International Journal of Higher Education Research, 67(5), 511–531. doi:10.1007/s10734-013-9658-0

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lawrence, J.H., Celis, S., & Ott, M. (2014). Is the tenure process fair? What faculty think. Journal of Higher Education, 85(2), 155–192. doi:10.1353/jhe.2014.0010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leslie, K., Lingard, L., & Whyte, S. (2005). Junior faculty experiences with informal mentoring. Medical Teacher, 27(8), 693–698. PubMed ID: 16451889 doi:10.1080/01421590500271217

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lodhi, A.S., Raza, S.A., & Dilshad, M. (2013). Investigating factors affecting faculty retention at business schools. Journal of Educational Research, 16(2), 21–33.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Maciag, M. (2016, May 31). The ‘Silver Tsunami’ has arrived in government. Governing: The State and Localities. Retrieved from https://www.governing.com/topics/mgmt/gov-government-retirement-survey-center-state-local.html

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marcus, J. (2015). On campus, older faculty keep on keepin’ on. NPR. Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2015/10/09/446568519/on-campus-older-faculty-keep-on-keeping-on

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McCullagh, P. (2016). Intra- or interdisciplinary research, teaching, and service in kinesiology. Kinesiology Today. Retrieved from http://www.americankinesiology.org/SubPages/Pages/Kinesiology%20Today%202016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Miller, M.T., Mamiseishvili, K., & Lee, D. (2016). Administrative hierarchy and faculty work: Examining faculty satisfaction with academic leadership. Journal of Academic Administration in Higher Education, 12(1), 1–7.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mitchell, K.M., & Martin, J. (2018). Gender bias in student evaluation. PS: Political Science and Politics, 51(3), 648–652.

  • Neumann, A., & Terosky, A. (2007). To give and to receive: Recently tenured professors’ experiences of service major research universities. Journal of Higher Education, 78(3), 282–310. doi:10.1353/jhe.2007.0018

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • O’Neil, D.A., & Bilimoria, D. (2005). Women’s career development phases—idealism, endurance and reinvention. Career Development International, 10(3), 168–189. doi:10.1108/13620430510598300

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pastore, D.L. (2013). Faculty perspectives on Baldwin and Chang’s mid-career faculty development model. Journal of Faculty Development, 27(2), 25–32.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reeve, G. (2009). AKA and Reeve launch first strategic planning effort. Kinesiology Today, 2(2). Retrieved from www.americankinesiology.org/Content/Documents/KT_May_2009_Vol-2_No-2.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reevey, G.M., & Deason, G. (2014). Predications of depression, stress, and anxiety among non-tenure track faculty. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 701. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00701

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rosser, S.B. (2007). Leveling the playing field for women in tenure and promotion. NWSA Journal, 19(3), 190–198.

  • Rosser, V.J. (2004). Faculty members’ intentions to leave: A national study on their worklife and satisfaction. Research in Higher Education, 45(3), 285–309. doi:10.1023/B:RIHE.0000019591.74425.f1

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Seglen, P.O. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal, 314, 497. doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7079.497

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Seldin, P. (2006). Evaluating faculty performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

  • Seldin, P., Miller, J.E., & Seldin, C.A. (2010). The teaching portfolio: A practical guide to improved performance and promotion/tenure decisions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state and higher education. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stack, M. (2018, October 5). Why I’m not surprised Nobel Laureate Donna Strickland isn’t a full professor. The Conversation.

  • Stewart, A., & Valian, V. (2018). Recruiting diverse and excellent new faculty. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2018/07/19/advice-deans-department-heads-and-search-committees-recruiting-diverse-faculty

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Strage, A., Nelson, C., & Meyers, S. (2008). “Stayin’ alive:” Meeting faculty mid-career professional renewal needs. Metropolitan Universities, 19(1), 71–83.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thomas, J.R. (2014). The public face of kinesiology in the 21st century. Quest, 66(3), 313–321. doi:10.1080/00336297.2014.918894

  • Wahrendorf, M., Blane, D., Bartley, M., Dragane, N., & Siegrist, J. (2013). Working conditions in mid-life and mental health in older ages. Advances in Life Course Research, 18(1), 16–25. PubMed ID: 24797464 doi:10.1016/j.alcr.2012.10.004

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Webber, K.L., & Rogers, S.M. (2018). Gender differences in faculty member job satisfaction: Equity forestalled? Research in Higher Education, 59(8), 1105–1132. doi:10.1007/s11162-018-9494-2

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wortley, D.B., & Amatea, E.S. (1982). Mapping adult life changes: A conceptual framework for organizing adult development theory. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 60(8), 476–482. doi:10.1002/j.2164-4918.1982.tb00700.x

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 73 73 24
Full Text Views 12 12 2
PDF Downloads 8 8 0