Evaluating Kinesiology Faculty: Best Practices, Challenges, and Innovative Approaches

in Kinesiology Review
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD  $24.95

Student 1 year subscription

USD  $41.00

1 year subscription

USD  $54.00

Student 2 year subscription

USD  $77.00

2 year subscription

USD  $101.00

One of the most important and yet more challenging and stressful tasks completed by a department chair is evaluating faculty. Regardless of its importance, though, department chairs often receive little or no training for this critical task. This paper contains three sections, all of which focus on faculty annual evaluations. The first section discusses a number of recommendations for conducting thorough and meaningful annual evaluations. The second section highlights a real case scenario at Auburn University in which all university departments were tasked with changing their evaluation procedures, criteria, and expectations for faculty performance to better align with the revised strategic goals and mission of the university. The third section highlights an innovative peer-based faculty performance-evaluation system employed in the department of kinesiology at the University of Maryland that is designed to engage all tenure-track faculty in the evaluation process.

Martin is with the Dept. of Kinesiology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA. Rudisill and Russell are with the the School of Kinesiology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL. Hatfield is with the Dept. of Kinesiology, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD. Reeve is with the American Kinesiology Association, P.O. Box 721, Mahomet, IL.

Martin (pemartin@iastate.edu) is corresponding author.All authors contributed equally to the manuscript.
  • American Association of University Professors. (2013). Trends in instructional staff employment status, 1975–2011. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://www.aaup.org/sites/default/files/files/AAUP_Report_InstrStaff-75-11_apr2013.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Armstrong, D.E., & Woloshyn, V.E. (2017). Exploring the tensions and ambiguities of university department chairs. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 47(1), 97–113.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Aziz, S., Mullins, M.E., Balzer, W.K., Grauer, E., Burnfield, J.L., Lodato, M.A., & Cohen-Powless, M.A. (2005). Understanding the training needs of department chairs. Studies in Higher Education, 30, 571–593. doi:10.1080/03075070500249260

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cipriano, R.E., & Riccardi, R.L. (2013). A continuing analysis of the unique department chair. The Department Chair, 23(4), 20–23.

  • Cresswell, J.W., Wheeler, D.W., Seagren, A.T., Egly, N.J., & Beyer, K.D. (1990). The academic chairperson’s handbook. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Crookston, R.K. (2010). Results from a national survey: The help chairs want most. The Department Chair, 21, 13–15. Retrieved from www.interscience.wiley.com. doi:10.1002/dch.20039.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gmelch, W. (2015). The call for leadership: Why chairs serve, what they do, and how long they should serve. AKA Monographs: Leading and Managing the Kinesiology Department, 1(1), 1–12.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gmelch, W.H., & Miskin, V.D. (2004). Chairing an academic department (2nd ed.). Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing.

  • Gmelch, W.H., Roberts, D., Ward, K., & Hirsch, S. (2017). A retrospective view of department chairs: Lessons learned. The Department Chair, 28, 1–4. doi:10.1002/dch.30140

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kotter, J.P., (2012). Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.

  • Opidee, I. (2018). Colleges develop faculty evaluation equations: Three ways to make effectiveness data work in faculty performance evaluations. University Business. Retrieved from https://universitybusiness.com/colleges-develop-faculty-evaluation-equations/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schulman, S., Hopkins, B., Kelchen, R., Mastracci, S., Yaya, M., Barnshaw, J., & Dunietz, S. (2016). Higher education at a crossroads: The economic value of tenure and the security of the profession. Academe, 102(2), 9–23. Retrieved from https://www.aaup.org/sites/default/files/2015-16EconomicStatusReport.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schwinghammer, T.L., Rodriguez, T.E., Weinstein, G., Sorofman, B.A., Bosso, J.A., Kerr, R.A., & Haden, N.K. (2012). AACP strategy for addressing the professional development needs of department chairs. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 76(6), S7. PubMed ID: 22919099 doi:10.5688/ajpe766S7

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thedwall, K. (2008). Nontenure-track faculty: Rising numbers, lost opportunities. New Directions for Higher Education, 2008, 11–19. doi:10.1002/he.308

  • Tucker, A. (1984). Chairing the academic department: Leadership among peers (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 45 45 11
Full Text Views 9 9 2
PDF Downloads 9 9 2