The Effect of the Presence of an Internet-Connected Mobile Tablet Computer on Physical Activity Behavior in Children

in Pediatric Exercise Science
Restricted access

Purchase article

USD $24.95

Student 1 year subscription

USD $68.00

1 year subscription

USD $90.00

Student 2 year subscription

USD $129.00

2 year subscription

USD $168.00

Background: Mobile Internet-connected electronic devices provide access to activities that have traditionally been associated with sedentary behavior. Because they are portable, these devices can be utilized in any environment. Therefore, providing children with access to these devices in environments that typically promote physical activity may result in a reduction in physical activity behavior. Purpose: To assess children’s physical and sedentary (ie, sitting) activity with and without the presence of a mobile Internet-connected tablet computer. Methods: A total of 20 children [6.7 (1.9) y old] participated in 2 simulated recess conditions in a gymnasium on separate days. During each condition, children had free-choice access physical activity options and a table of sedentary activities for 40 minutes. During 1 session, the iPad was present, and in the other session, it was not. Physical activity was monitored via an accelerometer, and sedentary time was monitored via a stopwatch. Results: Children significantly (P ≤ .03) reduced average physical activity intensity and increased their sedentary behavior with the iPad present [4.4 (4.0) metabolic equivalents/min and 20.9 (12.4) min sitting] versus the condition without the iPad present [5.3 (4.0) metabolic equivalents/min and 13.6 (13.2) min sitting]. Conclusion: Introducing an mobile Internet-connected tablet computer into a gymnasium reduced children’s physical activity intensity by 17% and increased sedentary behavior by 54%.

Kobak, Lepp, Faulkner, Martin, and Barkley are with the Dept. of Exercise Physiology, Kent State University, Kent, OH. Rebold is with the Dept. of Integrative Exercise Science, Hiram College, Hiram, OH.

Address author correspondence to Mallory S. Kobak at mkobak2@kent.edu.
Pediatric Exercise Science
Article Sections
References
  • 1.

    Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):191215. PubMed doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Barkley JELepp A. Cellular telephone use during free-living walking significantly reduces average walking speed. BMC Res Notes. 2016;9:195. PubMed doi:10.1186/s13104-016-2001-y

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Barkley JELepp A. Mobile phone use among college students is a sedentary leisure behavior which may interfere with exercise. Comp Hum Behav. 2016;56:2933. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.001

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Barkley JELepp ASalehi-Esfahani S. College students’ mobile telephone use is positively associated with sedentary behavior. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2016;10(6):43741. doi:10.1177/1559827615594338

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Barkley JERoemmich JNRyan EJBellar DBliss MV. Variety of exercise equipment and physical activity participation in children. J Sport Behav. 2011;34(2):13749.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Beets MWPitetti KHForlaw L. The role of self-efficacy and referent specific social support in promoting rural adolescent girls’ physical activity. Am J Health Behav. 2007;31(3):22737. doi:10.5993/AJHB.31.3.1

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Busschaert CCardon GCauwenberg Jet al. Tracking and predictors of screen time from early adolescence to early adulthood: a 10-year follow-up study. J Adolesc Health. 2015;56(4):4408. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.11.016

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Carson VJanssen I. Volume, patterns, and types of sedentary behavior and cardio-metabolic health in children and adolescents: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:274. PubMed doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-274

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Cox RSkouteris HRutherford LFuller-Tyszkiewicz MDell’ Aquila DHardy LL. Television viewing, television content, food intake, physical activity and body mass index: a cross-sectional study of preschool children aged 2–6 years. Health Promot J Austr. 2012;23(1):5862.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Dishman RKSallis JFOrenstein DR. The determinants of physical activity and exercise. Public Health Rep. 1985;100(2):15871. PubMed

  • 11.

    Dunstan DWBarr ELMHealy GNet al. Television viewing time and mortality: the Australian diabetes, obesity and lifestyle study. Circulation. 2010;121:38491. PubMed doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.894824

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Eccles JS. The development of children ages 6 to 14. Future Child. 1999;9(2):3044. PubMed doi:10.2307/1602703

  • 13.

    Epstein LHRoemmich JNCavanaugh MDPaluch RA. The motivation to be sedentary predicts weight change when sedentary behaviors are reduced. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:13. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-8-13

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Feda DMLambiase MJBarkley JERoemmich JN. Effect of increasing the variety of active toys on children’s active play. J Sci Med Sport. 2012;15(4):33440. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2011.12.004

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Freedson PPober DJanz KF. Calibration of accelerometer output for children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37:52330. doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000185658.28284.ba

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Freedson PSirard JDebold Eet al. Calibration of the Computer Science and Application Inc. (CSA) accelerometer 256. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997;29:45. doi:10.1097/00005768-199705001-00256

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Gebremariam MKTotland THAndersen LFet al. Stability and change in screen-based sedentary behaviours and associated factors among Norwegian children in the transition between childhood and adolescence. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(104):19.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Goran MIReynolds KD. Role of physical activity in the prevention of obesity in children. Int J Obes. 1999;3:51833.

  • 19.

    Hamilton MTHamilton DGZderic TW. Role of low energy expenditure and sitting in obesity, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Diabetes. 2007;56(11):265567. PubMed doi:10.2337/db07-0882

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Haskell WLLee IMPate RRet al. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39(8):142334. PubMed doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e3180616b27

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Hills APAndersen LBByrne NM. Physical activity and obesity in children. Br J Sports Med. 2012;45(11):86670. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2011-090199

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Himes JHDietz WH. Guidelines for overweight in adolescent preventive services: recommendations from an expert committee. The Expert Committee on Clinical Guidelines for Overweight in Adolescent Preventive Services. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994;59(2):30716. PubMed

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Juvancic-Heltzel JAGlickman ELBarkley JE. The effect of variety on physical activity: a cross-sectional study. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(1):24451. doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182518010

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Lepp ABarkley JESanders GJRebold MGates P. The relationship between cell phone use, and sedentary activity, and cardiorespiratory fitness in a sample of U.S. college students. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013;10:79. PubMed doi:10.1186/1479-5868-10-79

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    McVeigh JSmith AHowie EStraker L. Trajectories of television watching from childhood to early adulthood and their association with body composition and mental health outcomes in young adults. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(4):e0152879. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152879

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    O’Keeffe GSClarke-Pearson K; Council on Communications and Media. The impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families. J Pediatr. 2011;127(4):8004. doi:10.1542/peds.2011-0054

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Penko ALBarkley JE. Motivation and physiologic responses of playing a physically interactive video game relative to a sedentary alternative in children. Ann Behav Med. 2010;39(2):1629. PubMed doi:10.1007/s12160-010-9164-x

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Pradinuk MChanoine JGoldman RD. Obesity and physical activity in children. Can Fam Physician. 2011;57(7):77982. PubMed

  • 29.

    Rebold MJLepp AKobak MSMcDaniel JBarkley JE. The effect of parental involvement on children’s physical activity. J Pediatr. 2015;170:20610. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.11.072

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Rebold MJLepp ASanders GJBarkley JE. The impact of cell phone use on the intensity and liking of a bout of treadmill exercise. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(5):e0125029. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0125029

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Rebold MJSheehan TDirlam MMaldonado TO’Donnell D. The impact of cell phone texting on the amount of time spent exercising at different intensities. Comput Human Behav. 2015;55:16771. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.005

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Rittenhouse MSalvy SJBarkley JE. The effect of peer influence on the amount of physical activity performed in 8- to 12-year-old boys. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2011;23(1):4960. PubMed doi:10.1123/pes.23.1.49

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    Robertson RJGoss FLAndreacci JLDube JJRutkowski JJSnee BM. Validation of the children’s OMNI RPE scale for stepping exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(2):2908. PubMed doi:10.1249/01.MSS.0000149888.39928.9F

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    Rodriguez DABrown ALTroped PJ. Portable global positioning units to complement accelerometry-based physical activity monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(11):S57281. doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000185297.72328.ce

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35.

    Roemmich JNBarkley JEEpstein LHLobarinas CLWhite TMFoster JH. Validity of PCERT and OMNI-walk/run ratings of perceived exertion during treadmill exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38(5):10149. doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000218123.81079.49

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36.

    Roemmich JNBarkley JELobarinas CLFoster JHWhite TMEpstein LH. Association of liking and reinforcing value with children’s physical activity. Physiol Behav. 2008;93:10118. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.01.010

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37.

    Sanders GJJuvancic-Heltzel JWillaimson MLRoemmich JNFeda DMBarkley JE. The effect of increasing autonomy through choice on young children’s physical activity behavior. J Phys Act Health. 2016;13:42832. PubMed doi:10.1123/jpah.2015-0171

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38.

    Sanders GJPeacock CAWilliamson MLWilson KCarnes ABarkley JE. The effect of friendship groups on children’s physical activity: an experimental study. J Behav Health. 2014;3(2):95100. doi:10.5455/jbh.20140424022157

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39.

    Sanders GJRebold MPeacock CAWilliamson MLSanto ASBarkley JE. The physiologic and behavioral implications of playing active and sedentary video games in a seated and standing position. Int J Exerc Sci. 2014;7(3):194201. PubMed

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40.

    Sanders GJSanto ASPeacock CAWilliamson MLVon Carlowitz KPBarkley JE. Physiologic responses, liking and motivation for playing the same video game on an active versus a traditional, non-active gaming system. Int J Exerc Sci. 2012;5(2):1609. PubMed

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41.

    Sudan MOslen JSigsgaard TKheifets L. Trends in cell phone use among children in the Danish national birth cohort at ages 7 and 11 years. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2016;26:60612. PubMed doi:10.1038/jes.2016.17

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42.

    Trost SGWard DSMoorehead SMWatson PDRiner WBurke JR. Validity of the computer science and applications (CSA) activity monitor in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30(4):62933. PubMed doi:10.1097/00005768-199804000-00023

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43.

    Weiss MR. Motivating kids in physical activity. Pres Counc Phys Fit Sports Res Dig. 2000;3(11):110.

Article Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 91 91 33
Full Text Views 2 2 2
PDF Downloads 3 3 3
Altmetric Badge
PubMed
Google Scholar