A Combination of Amino Acids and Caffeine Enhances Sprint Running Capacity in a Hot, Hypoxic Environment

in International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism

Click name to view affiliation

Tom R. Eaton
Search for other papers by Tom R. Eaton in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Aaron Potter
Search for other papers by Aaron Potter in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
François Billaut
Search for other papers by François Billaut in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Derek Panchuk
Search for other papers by Derek Panchuk in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
David B. Pyne
Search for other papers by David B. Pyne in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Christopher J. Gore
Search for other papers by Christopher J. Gore in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ting-Ting Chen
Search for other papers by Ting-Ting Chen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Leon McQuade
Search for other papers by Leon McQuade in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Nigel K. Stepto
Search for other papers by Nigel K. Stepto in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Heat and hypoxia exacerbate central nervous system (CNS) fatigue. We therefore investigated whether essential amino acid (EAA) and caffeine ingestion attenuates CNS fatigue in a simulated team sport–specific running protocol in a hot, hypoxic environment. Subelite male team sport athletes (n = 8) performed a repeat sprint running protocol on a nonmotorized treadmill in an extreme environment on 4 separate occasions. Participants ingested one of four supplements: a double placebo, 3 mg.kg-1 body mass of caffeine + placebo, 2 × 7 g EAA (Musashi Create)+placebo, or caffeine + EAA before each exercise session using a randomized, double-blind crossover design. Electromyography (EMG) activity and quadriceps evoked responses to magnetic stimulation were assessed from the dominant leg at preexercise, halftime, and postexercise. Central activation ratio (CAR) was used to quantify completeness of quadriceps activation. Oxygenation of the prefrontal cortex was measured via near-infrared spectroscopy. Mean sprint work was higher (M = 174 J, 95% CI [23, 324], p < .05, d = 0.30; effect size, likely beneficial) in the caffeine + EAA condition versus EAAs alone. The decline in EMG activity was less (M = 13%, 95% CI [0, 26]; p < .01, d = 0.58, likely beneficial) in caffeine + EAA versus EAA alone. Similarly, the pre- to postexercise decrement in CAR was significantly less (M = −2.7%, 95% CI [0.4, 5.4]; p < .05, d = 0.50, likely beneficial) when caffeine + EAA were ingested compared with placebo. Cerebral oxygenation was lower (M = −5.6%, 95% CI [1.0, 10.1]; p < .01, d = 0.60, very likely beneficial) in the caffeine + EAA condition compared with LNAA alone. Coingestion of caffeine and EAA appears to maintain muscle activation and central drive, with a small improvement in running performance.

Eaton, Potter, Billaut, Panchuk, Chen, and Stepto are with the Institute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living, Victoria University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Billaut is with the Département de Kinésiologie, Université Laval, Quebec City, Québec, Canada. Pyne and Gore are with the Australian Institute of Sport, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia. Chen is with the Graduate Institute of Athletics and Coaching Sciences, National Taiwan Sport University, Taoyuan, Taiwan. McQuade is with Australian Proteome Analysis Facility, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Address author correspondence to Nigel K. Stepto at nigel.stepto@vu.edu.au.
  • Collapse
  • Expand