Metabolic Power Method: Underestimation of Energy Expenditure in Field-Sport Movements Using a Global Positioning System Tracking System

Click name to view affiliation

Darcy M. Brown
Search for other papers by Darcy M. Brown in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Dan B. Dwyer
Search for other papers by Dan B. Dwyer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Samuel J. Robertson
Search for other papers by Samuel J. Robertson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Paul B. Gastin
Search for other papers by Paul B. Gastin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

The purpose of this study was to assess the validity of a global positioning system (GPS) tracking system to estimate energy expenditure (EE) during exercise and field-sport locomotor movements. Twenty-seven participants each completed a 90-min exercise session on an outdoor synthetic futsal pitch. During the exercise session, they wore a 5-Hz GPS unit interpolated to 15 Hz and a portable gas analyzer that acted as the criterion measure of EE. The exercise session was composed of alternating 5-minute exercise bouts of randomized walking, jogging, running, or a field-sport circuit (×3) followed by 10 min of recovery. One-way analysis of variance showed significant (P < .01) and very large underestimations between GPS metabolic power– derived EE and oxygen-consumption (VO2) -derived EE for all field-sport circuits (% difference ≈ –44%). No differences in EE were observed for the jog (7.8%) and run (4.8%), whereas very large overestimations were found for the walk (43.0%). The GPS metabolic power EE over the entire 90-min session was significantly lower (P < .01) than the VO2 EE, resulting in a moderate underestimation overall (–19%). The results of this study suggest that a GPS tracking system using the metabolic power model of EE does not accurately estimate EE in field-sport movements or over an exercise session consisting of mixed locomotor activities interspersed with recovery periods; however, is it able to provide a reasonably accurate estimation of EE during continuous jogging and running.

Brown, Dwyer, and Gastin are with the Centre for Sport Research, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia. Robertson is with the Inst of Sport, Exercise & Active Living, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Address author correspondence to Paul Gastin at pgastin@deakin.edu.au.
  • Collapse
  • Expand