Relationship between Clinical and Forceplate Measures of Postural Stability

in Journal of Sport Rehabilitation

Click name to view affiliation

Bryan L. Riemann
Search for other papers by Bryan L. Riemann in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Kevin M. Guskiewicz
Search for other papers by Kevin M. Guskiewicz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Edgar W. Shields
Search for other papers by Edgar W. Shields in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Although sophisticated forceplate systems are available for postural stability analyses, their use is limited in many sports medicine settings because of budgetary constraints. The purpose of this investigation was to compare a clinical method of evaluating postural stability with a force-platform sway measure. Participants completed a battery of three stance variations (double, single, and tandem) on two different surfaces (firm and foam) while standing on a force platform. This arrangement allowed for simultaneous comparisons between forceplate sway measures and clinical assessments using the Balance Error Scoring System (BESS). Significant correlations were revealed for the single-leg and tandem stances on the firm surface and for double, single, and tandem stances on the foam surface. These results suggest that the BESS is a reliable method of assessing postural stability in the absence of computerized balance systems.

Bryan L. Riemann is with the Sports Medicine Program at the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261. Kevin M. Guskiewicz is with the Department of Physical Education, Exercise and Sport Science and the Sports Medicine Research Laboratory at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-8605. Edgar W. Shields is with the Department of Physical Education, Exercise and Sport Science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 4066 1360 222
Full Text Views 152 26 2
PDF Downloads 173 42 3